- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,848
- Liked Posts:
- 9,042
So, by those standards you agree Castro is the better SS. Thanks for the info.
- Status
So, by those standards you agree Castro is the better SS. Thanks for the info.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,848
- Liked Posts:
- 9,042
Lol, every point in this post is wrong. Especially, the Miggy talk. Homer much?
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,848
- Liked Posts:
- 9,042
Lol I am positive you black out when you type. You have trolled since your first post. You are not that good at it. You dont bring the stupid funny. You just bring the stupid.
ChiSoxCity
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,701
- Liked Posts:
- 613
Your ability to circumvent logic and reason is Cub fandom personified (and a wee bit of brain damage).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ChiSoxCity
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,701
- Liked Posts:
- 613
Aside from the Miggy comparison, how can publicly known facts be wrong? Reality must be such an annoyance for you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ChiSoxCity
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,701
- Liked Posts:
- 613
And there you have it, gentlemen. A classic case of phallic envy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Boobaby1
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 18, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,236
- Liked Posts:
- 1,180
That 2006 Cardinals team with Weaver, Suppan, and Reyes pitching lights out in the WS comes to mind as the worst team yet IMO. What did they win, 83 games that year or something?
They still won and prove that all you have to do is get in and anything can happen.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,848
- Liked Posts:
- 9,042
Yet again, by the stats you showed. Castro was the better SS and is younger. Numbers are hard for you to follow.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,848
- Liked Posts:
- 9,042
A rookie is a rookie. Remember Hideo Nomo? Your homerism is outstanding.
ChiSoxCity
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,701
- Liked Posts:
- 613
You might want to actually look at the stats and compare them. If you need me to hold your hand and walk you through it, just ask. [emoji3]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,848
- Liked Posts:
- 9,042
Yep, compare them.
- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,886
- Liked Posts:
- 26,376
Guess they're right about that education level of Sox fans.
- Joined:
- Jun 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 7,127
- Liked Posts:
- 3,072
- Location:
- Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
Please lock this thread.
What an abortion.
What an abortion.
justaChifan
Active member
- Joined:
- Feb 4, 2013
- Posts:
- 635
- Liked Posts:
- 205
This is CHICITYSPORTS.com. Why the problem with Sox fans posting on "CHI"citysports.com?
Jon Lester is a good signing.
To say Sox fans shouldn't be proud of 1 world series win in 88 years just makes Cubs message board fans look foolish.
Jon Lester is a good signing.
To say Sox fans shouldn't be proud of 1 world series win in 88 years just makes Cubs message board fans look foolish.
- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,886
- Liked Posts:
- 26,376
LOL WUT
That's pathetic just like the Cubs not winning in over 100 years.
Neither side of town has much to brag about with the histories of their organizations.
And guess what.... 2005... is.... HISTORY.
justaChifan
Active member
- Joined:
- Feb 4, 2013
- Posts:
- 635
- Liked Posts:
- 205
- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,886
- Liked Posts:
- 26,376
It was a decade ago.
- Joined:
- Jun 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 7,127
- Liked Posts:
- 3,072
- Location:
- Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
I don't mind people dismissing 2005 as the past. That's fine, it was 10 years ago it doesn't have anything to do with the current team.
I have noticed though, that a lot of Cubs fans (not saying anyone in this thread does it) will say 2005 is in the past, but still get a boner over the 85 Bears (who are brought up a lot in this town). Seems kind of weak that its the same situation, but treated differently.
But the notion that the history of Chicago baseball is rubbish is spot on. I mean, three pennants since 1945 COMBINED? That's horse shit.
I have noticed though, that a lot of Cubs fans (not saying anyone in this thread does it) will say 2005 is in the past, but still get a boner over the 85 Bears (who are brought up a lot in this town). Seems kind of weak that its the same situation, but treated differently.
But the notion that the history of Chicago baseball is rubbish is spot on. I mean, three pennants since 1945 COMBINED? That's horse shit.
justaChifan
Active member
- Joined:
- Feb 4, 2013
- Posts:
- 635
- Liked Posts:
- 205
That's right.
No reason to gloat for either team,,, yet.
If the 20 or so posters on this Cub board want to treat this as sacred ground, so be it.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
What a stupid thread. Locked.
Sent from My 1998 Palm Pilot Using Tapatalk
Sent from My 1998 Palm Pilot Using Tapatalk
- Status
Members online NOW
- Member
- Admin
- Mod
- Donor
- HOF
- 1COBearsfan
- abegibronreborn
- ATLBear
- bamainatlanta
- Bear Nation
- bearsfan1977
- Beast15
- bufordht
- cameronkrazie86
- Canth
- Certified Troll
- Chicago Staleys
- cwcwcwcw1
- daniel-adams@charter.net
- DC
- dignan
- EMAN
- Hawkeye OG
- Herb Gardner
- hojkin
- inchibearfan
- Les Grossman
- maxhatter
- Penny Traitor
- policeman
- remydat
- Robocop 80
- Salvaged Ship
- TezMaKai
- Yogi
- Zvbxrpl
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up -
Penny Traitorバカでも才能は一つ