Why did Ryan Poles and Ben Johnson draft two slot receivers with the first two picks?

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,875
Liked Posts:
15,039
Seems like luxury picks when there are glaring holes and potential studs who could fill those holes.

Would love to look back in a couple of years and be wrong, but I doubt it.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,502
Liked Posts:
18,201
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
Seems like luxury picks when there are glaring holes and potential studs who could fill those holes.

Would love to look back in a couple of years and be wrong, but I doubt it.

Please provide details on what you would have preferred. That way we’ll know for sure whether you’re right or wrong.
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,875
Liked Posts:
15,039
What does that mean? If the TE they selected ends up being better than reaching for Mykel Williams or if the WR ends up being better than the tackle from Minnesota or the edge from BC we have a problem?
If this backup TE ends up better than a starting lineman (who is much needed), I’ll gladly eat my words.

When are you going to stop giving the crappy GM for a losing franchise the benefit of the doubt.

Most Bears drafts are bad. There’s nothing to indicate this one won’t be either.

Loveland is the reach. Would rather have a starting lineman.
 

LIBlue

Active member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
393
Liked Posts:
418
Pick an o-line or d-line guy who was taken in the first after Loveland. Almost all those guys will have a better NFL career. Very predictable.
Where were these offensive lineman? They must be guards because we have our right tackle, and I am not sure if there a true top notch LT in the draft, especially at ten. Simply put, who were the BPA in the infinite wisdom of Toast88?
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,875
Liked Posts:
15,039
Where were these offensive lineman? They must be guards because we have our right tackle, and I am not sure if there a true top notch LT in the draft, especially at ten. Simply put, who were the BPA in the infinite wisdom of Toast88?
Keep white knighting for this crappy franchise. Then when Poles is fired, pretend like you always knew 🤣
 

HearshotKDS

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 9, 2012
Posts:
7,913
Liked Posts:
8,151
Location:
Lake Forest
If the TE they selected ends up being better than reaching for Mykel Williams
The NFL took Mykel Williams at 11 - even if you dont agree with the OPs sentiment (i dont really agree with him) why is the thought of taking him at 10 a reach? ive seen this from multiple people now, he was projected to go anywhere from 9 to the 20s and the NFL told you which part of that range they valued him at. The 49ers arent exactly incompetent drafters on Defense.
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,534
Liked Posts:
10,248
If this backup TE ends up better than a starting lineman (who is much needed), I’ll gladly eat my words.

When are you going to stop giving the crappy GM for a losing franchise the benefit of the doubt.

Most Bears drafts are bad. There’s nothing to indicate this one won’t be either.

Loveland is the reach. Would rather have a starting lineman.
You asked WHY they were drafted. That is the likely answer.

Loveland was rated 7th overall on ESPN big board. Williams was rated 12th. So this is not some oddity that the Bears would have them also rated that way.
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,875
Liked Posts:
15,039
You asked WHY they were drafted. That is the likely answer.

Loveland was rated 7th overall on ESPN big board. Williams was rated 12th. So this is not some oddity that the Bears would have them also rated that way.
Is Loveland going to be worth the 10th overall pick or not?

Seems unlikely.
 

Salvaged Ship

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 23, 2024
Posts:
1,129
Liked Posts:
1,538
Seems like luxury picks when there are glaring holes and potential studs who could fill those holes.

Would love to look back in a couple of years and be wrong, but I doubt it.
You should have filled them in on these potential studs, obviously they didn’t see them.
 

Probie2429

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 20, 2013
Posts:
4,006
Liked Posts:
2,653
Bears have the uncanny ability to always end up missing on an obvious target right before their own pick in the first and then seem completely caught off guard on what to do as a result. Loveland might turn out to be great but nothing in college indicated that. You take guys with traits on day 3 instead of production since you’re paying them peanuts. A top 10 pick is earning millions and you better get some ROI as a result.
 

IBleedBearsBlood

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,404
Liked Posts:
5,621
Seems like luxury picks when there are glaring holes and potential studs who could fill those holes.

Would love to look back in a couple of years and be wrong, but I doubt it.
Because they wanted to. Simple as that. And they are at the front seat to make that decision, so they have every right to pick them if they want to.

Let’s see how it plays out. Out of our control.
 

LIBlue

Active member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
393
Liked Posts:
418
Just so I understand, who was this target? You may be right, but who was this target?

Bears have the uncanny ability to always end up missing on an obvious target right before their own pick in the first and then seem completely caught off guard on what to do as a result. Loveland might turn out to be great but nothing in college indicated that. You take guys with traits on day 3 instead of production since you’re paying them peanuts. A top 10 pick is earning millions and you better get some ROI as a result.
 

Top