- Joined:
- Jun 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,236
- Liked Posts:
- 668
- Location:
- UofM-Twin Cities Campus
Thanks for missin' the got damn point.
Thanks for missin' the got damn point.
You guys are missing the point. From an NBA perspective. If im David Stern and he says that. The fact that he would give back all six of the Bulls championships for one ring shows hes not commited. The Bulls arent his number one priority.
From a fan standpoint. That dont make you a little angry?
No...because I would like to think Reinsdorf like the half dozen other owners I just named in my last post...can walk and chew gum at the same time. I don't need the owner of the Chicago Bulls to have his own Bulls den in his home and wearing Chicago Bulls footie pajamas to bed at night. I need him to put the team in a position to succeed. This is a god awful dumb thread, common sense answers this question.
You guys are missing the point. From an NBA perspective. If im David Stern and he says that. The fact that he would give back all six of the Bulls championships for one ring shows hes not commited. The Bulls arent his number one priority.
From a fan standpoint. That dont make you a little angry?
Because the Bulls used a portion of the $5 million midlevel exception for Hinrich and the biannual exception to sign Bellinelli, it's impossible for the Bulls to match even Asik's $5 million starting salary and stay below the hard cap of $74.3 million. They will pay the luxury tax for the first time in franchise history
It's called a double standard. Only hou has the right to complain and then change his stance at will. He's going to always go the opposite of the board because he is a contrarian. It's his shtick.You are so dam phony.
You complain all season long about how management fails to bring in a superstar.
Now you are swinging on managements nutsack.
**** GARPAX and **** Jerry.
I can respect Jerrys love for the Sox(I am a sox fan)...
But I don't respect how he gives the Bulls th backseat.
He should sell them.....He's rich enough
Like I said, championship.So let me get this straight.
You are telling me that the first time Jerry goes over the salary cap, its for fucking Hinrich and Belinelli?
How Special person.
It's called a double standard. Only hou has the right to complain and then change his stance at will. He's going to always go the opposite of the board because he is a contrarian. It's his shtick.
[video=youtube;ppJDiSai2Pg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppJDiSai2Pg[/video]Because the Bulls used a portion of the $5 million midlevel exception for Hinrich and the biannual exception to sign Bellinelli, it's impossible for the Bulls to match even Asik's $5 million starting salary and stay below the hard cap of $74.3 million. They will pay the luxury tax for the first time in franchise history
LoL
Its sooooooooo dam obvious, ain't it?
:shrug:
Not mad at all...just think its something wrong when the truth is laid out to you...and you are confused. But hey, do your thing bruh.
So let me get this straight.
You are telling me that the first time Jerry goes over the salary cap, its for fucking Hinrich and Belinelli?
So basically, Jerry will not go over the cap for a real superstar, but he will go over it for scrubs.
...............Nice....................
How Special person.
WRONG. We are going into the LT for the first time BECAUSE OF DERRICK ROSE!!!!!!
Man the idiocy on this board can be nauseating at times.
Do any of you understand context?
The fact that he would give back all six of the Bulls championships for one ring shows hes not commited. The Bulls arent his number one priority.
It's not even that. The OP, who I believe is a certified idiot, asked why JR is still the owner. Hou gave an answer to why, and then, two other certified idiots go off on some stupid tangent that has nothing to do with the answer to the original question.Obviously not.
Not like Reinsdorf said that because he doesn't care about the Bulls. It's because the Sox needed a championship and he was being asked about the Sox. It's called giving the "right answers" in an interview.