ok lets go by the eye test,.....the Bears oline pass blocking sucks...it needs to get better. at least middle of the pack.....
That’s me actually
Not bad at all. Has a 92.8 rating and averages over 5 yards per rush attempt.
Bad idea. Most people just see what they want to see.
Wait rushing counts now?
Stats don’t tell the whole story either
If it didn't, Fields wouldn't have a job.
That's like people who say they don't test well. You don't test well cause you're stupid...
Oh ok then. Eli Manning is a better Qb than Favre due to Eli having two rings and less interceptions
I've always thought Favre was overrated. He has no right being mentioned in the same breath as other GOAT candidates. It's good you put him on Eli's level. That's where he belongs.
Is Eli better though? I pulled to obscure stats out to prove it
You are obviously biased by stats over watching the actual games if you are saying Favre was on Eli Mannings level.
Fields rating is trash, but he he has up and down games which puts him there--usually terrible games against better teams.
Really? Stats are a lot alike with the 2. Favre had some real good years and just as many real bad ones. In that way, both were the same. 2 rings to 1 gives Eli an edge, especially w/5 years less playing time. Also used less drugs and sent no dick pics.
Fields is at least # 1 at something.
If you want your balls held for a long time, he's your guy.
That is an amazing set of stats. Whats most amazing is how wrong it is.
Should he get credit for 2 SB wins to Favre's 1? Yes. When Packers won that 1 SB, they had the #1 defense in the league. When Giants won those 2 SBs, they had the #17 and #25 defense.
Off field shenanigans aside, Eli was an average QB. Wins as a QB Stat is propaganda. If all it took to determine if a player is good or bad was a stat, gambling wouldn't be legal. Just pick the QB with the better stats and collect the payout.