Boobaby1
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 18, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,236
- Liked Posts:
- 1,180
I don't look at wins as a hugely telling stat, certainly in the short term. Grienke went through a 9 game stretch of pitching great without getting a win early in the year. His win total suffered, but it didn't reflect his performance. Shark had a similar run in 2014. Shark's win total in 2014 was a very poor indicator of how he truly pitched.
Except.......when he started getting support, he still didn't win. And prior to that season, he just didn't win. (He was on a bad Cub team, so nobody is expecting 20-win seasons. But the guy can't get to TEN. Oh, wait, that's unfair. he got all the way to eleven in 2015. In 32 starts.
He is 30 years old, and has 47 wins. 47 for his entire career. How long can someone try and blame that on bad luck? It is not bad luck. Every pitcher goes through periods of poor run support and "bad luck". But this guy simply does not win games for you. Period.
It's foolish to vote for the Cy Young award winner based on their Wins in a particular season.
It is not foolish to avoid guys already on the wrong side of 30 who have not shown the ability to win games.
Is he the worst option out there? Of course not. Is he a guy we should pursue? Not really.
I am not advocating Shark in anyway by saying this, because I have no idea what the front office will do.
The only reason I can say that they may pursue him is that he directly is a major upgrade over Dan Haren. Of course, that still leaves you with Hammel and Hendricks (not a bad #5), but if the Cubs trade for a younger starter (which I think they will), then all of a sudden, it lessens the blow of just bringing in Shark.
Now. If they were to sign lets say Zimmermann, and then still trade for a young pitcher, well, I am certainly okay with that too.