Kush77
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 15, 2009
- Posts:
- 2,096
- Liked Posts:
- 151
My evil plan is working. HA HA HA HA HA.
You would be guessing wrong...put Horace Grant and that Bulls team with Wade, and they win a hell of a lot more than 15 games. I looked at everything, and Wade is a better player! I have watched them both play...most who watched them both extensively would say that Wade is the better of the two.
iverson is not better than lebron neither is wade...look at the body of work..
i would take wade going away in the finals..but overall lebron is the better player
seriously its ok to admit you really hate lebron..dont act like you're neutral when you put lebron behind james worthy
What you guys need to realize that I have an opinion and I am not that big on LeBron as a player. Cleveland was not some YMCA team that LeBron took deep into the playoffs. He also had a very good coach who didn't get alot of credit. You guys always act so crazy when someone isn't putting LeBron on some pedestal lol.
I honestly haven't stopped laughing at the thought that James Worthy is a more creative finisher than Lebron James.
I'm not ignoring people because they disagree with me. I'm ignoring people because they are morons who don't add anything of substance to what is being discussed. Why should I have to wade (not better than Lebron) through those posts?When it turns into hypothetical situations and, you people get upset to the point you ignore people because somebody disagrees with you.....
Reminds me of this...
No, people act crazy when outlandish statements are made. Lebron James is a great player, you may not be "big on Lebron" but do you have to hate on him in the process?
I will repeat what I have said in the past...just as with Shaq and Kobe, I have seldom if ever rooted for those guys to win...anything. However, they were great players and I can be objective in how I view those players relative to history with no problems.
If you have an issue with what I have posted, than tell me. Don't make comments and not have the sense to debate me on it. Unlike you, I would keep it on topic. But if you know you can't like I'm thinking you are not able to do, then be quite because everyone else here is ignoring you as well.
Pippen is firmly entrenched in the top 50. The only guys I wouldnt include on your list into the to 50 is iverson, and wade. Or at least not at the expense of pippen. But thses are the guys that for sure would come off before pippen.
Archibald
Arizen
Bing
Dubucherre
Drexler
Cowens
Cousey
Frazier
Gervin
Hayes
Lucas
Marivich
Mchale
Parrish
Shayes
Stockton
Worthy
How you can say pippen comes off the top 50 before these guys says a lot about your view off pippen.
I don't see the "idiocy" that you're claiming Prope. Seems to me that is his opinion and he's doing his best to justify it.
Nothing wrong with that at all. Even if I don't agree with the Worthy > LeBron thing....but, he's doing what he's supposed to do....discuss....on a discussion board.
1. Larry BirdSo all I have to think about is: is Scottie under the ten best SF of all time???
1. Larry Bird
2. Elgin Baylor
3. Dr. J
4. Havlicek
5. Dantley
6. James
7. Wilkins
8. Pippen
9. Worthy
10. Barry
1. Larry Bird
2. Elgin Baylor
3. Dr. J
4. Havlicek
5. Dantley
6. James
7. Wilkins
8. Pippen
9. Worthy
10. Barry
I have a high opinion of Scottie Pippen. I respect him as a solid all-around offensive player, one of the greatest defenders this game has ever seen and a world-class athlete.
But, the Top 50 list has to include guys from the 70s, 60s etc..
If I were coaching a game in 2011, would I take Pippen over Dave DeBusschere? Of course. But the list need to include players from the NBAs past.
But this was the NBA's list - not my personal list. My personal list would include mostly players from the 80s to the present. I was looking at it from that point of view.
As far as your list - I'm not taking off Stockton, Parish, McHale, Drexler or Worthy. I also think Dominique Wilkins should have been on the original top 50. But I would add Bill Walton to your list of guys that should come off.
You listed 17 guys, I would not have 5 on there. That puts your list down to 12.
I listed 10 guys that could be on there, then throw in the 2 point guards I left out (Kidd and Nash). That's 12.
So Pippen could be a guy that comes off the list. His spot in a Top 50, in 2011, isn't "firmly entrenched."
After reading the last few pages of this post where you guys are saying that pippen doesn't deserve to be in the top 50 alltime, I about gave up hope that the posters on this thread will ever get there brain cells back...Just say no to drugs because it is distorting your logic, mind and vision...PIPPEN MORE THAN DESERVES TO BE ON THE TOP 50 LIST FOR CERTAIN..IF HE DIDN'T, HE WOULDN'T BE ON THE LIST IN THE FIRST PLACE..THE EXPERTS PLACED HIM THERE, NOPT A BUNCH OF WANNABE NO IT ALLS ON A MESSAGBOARD....I AM ASHAMED TO CALL YOU GUYS BULLS FANS SOMTIMES...I PERSONALLY WOULD PUT PIPPEN IN THE TOP 20 OF ALL TIME somewhere in between 10 to 15...That is my opinion in reality..you doont have to agree with me...It is what it is..