2015 Cubs Offseason Discussion

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
The problem is Boras doesn't want his clients to extend. And he really doesn't have to also unless he can make more over the 7 years of control vs the arb process. But with Bryant's talent he should get into heavy paydays by then.

If they start him in mid apr 2015 he would be at 500k 2016 500k 2017 he would be up for super 2 and that makes him a 4 year arb case. Yould have to expect he would be looing at 2-5 mil at this point then x2 that each year.

They could ink him to a 10 year deal off the bat and buy up 3 years of control for 100 mil but I'm not sure if Boras would go with that.

Which as shown here multiple times and said by others it doesn't matter what Boras wants. It's what his agent wants. If Kris doesn't want a long term deal he won't take one. But given the money that flows to sophomore and below players, He'll jump as Castro, Rizzo (his two future teammates) did.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
34,927
Liked Posts:
19,055
CBS' Jon Heyman reports that the Giancarlo Stanton deal 'is in place".

$325 for 13 years, as discussed here. He seems to be saying it is finalized, though CBS' caption says Mike Stanton will receive $325 million, which probably comes as a very pleasant surprise to Mike Stanton.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
34,927
Liked Posts:
19,055
It includes an early opt-out clause.

"...and while there is still no official word from the team, and perhaps nothing's been signed yet, there is a clear understanding the deal will be finalized and Stanton will remain a Marlin for at least the next five or six years."
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
It includes an early opt-out clause.

"...and while there is still no official word from the team, and perhaps nothing's been signed yet, there is a clear understanding the deal will be finalized and Stanton will remain a Marlin for at least the next five or six years."

So he can have his cake and eat it too. Nice.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
34,927
Liked Posts:
19,055
So he can have his cake and eat it too. Nice.

Yeah, life is pretty good for Giancarlo right now. He can earn over $125 million in Miami, and leave to a contender if the Marlins aren't a contender. Not too bad.

I am puzzled by the Marlins timing. He hasn't proven he can come back from his injury yet - most likely he'll be fine. But not everyone is. Why not wait a bit? And why tie the team to a 13 year contract and give the opt out after 5-6 years?

Guess they needed to show commitment to him in order to have any hope to ever sell tickets.
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
@Buster_ESPN: One possible way for the Cubs to land a catcher: the D-Backs' Miguel Montero, who is owed $40 million over next three seasons.
 

Boobaby1

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,236
Liked Posts:
1,180
@Buster_ESPN: One possible way for the Cubs to land a catcher: the D-Backs' Miguel Montero, who is owed $40 million over next three seasons.

Trade them Travis Wood and Castillo. The Cubs get their LH, OBP, with a little pop catcher and free up a roster spot, though at 31 is a risk. The D-Backs get out from under his contract and essentially could let the others go at any time if they need to. I wouldn't trade much in prospects to acquire him.

Would Castillo see much action if he stayed and they picked up Montero? It essentially makes him worth not much to other teams to me.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
Trade them Travis Wood and Castillo. The Cubs get their LH, OBP, with a little pop catcher and free up a roster spot, though at 31 is a risk. The D-Backs get out from under his contract and essentially could let the others go at any time if they need to. I wouldn't trade much in prospects to acquire him.

Would Castillo see much action if he stayed and they picked up Montero? It essentially makes him worth not much to other teams to me.

For that you should scream that THeo and crew are dumb as rocks. For the price Montero ain't that much of an upgrade over Castillo.
 

Boobaby1

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,236
Liked Posts:
1,180
For that you should scream that THeo and crew are dumb as rocks. For the price Montero ain't that much of an upgrade over Castillo.

Well the talk was already that Travis Wood might be non-tendered. And like I said, if they acquired Montero, what do you do with Castillo?

An alternative would be something like Castillo maybe being moved to LA for Crawford who would probably be an upgrade to Ellis, but that would be an awful lot to make happen in an off-season.

None of this is going to happen anyways.

The Cubs will resort back to the original plan and look for pitching, keep Castillo, and probably use in-house Lopez as a back-up and maybe get a LF platoon player.

Anything beyond that will be jaw dropping.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
Well the talk was already that Travis Wood might be non-tendered. And like I said, if they acquired Montero, what do you do with Castillo?

An alternative would be something like Castillo maybe being moved to LA for Crawford who would probably be an upgrade to Ellis, but that would be an awful lot to make happen in an off-season.

None of this is going to happen anyways.

The Cubs will resort back to the original plan and look for pitching, keep Castillo, and probably use in-house Lopez as a back-up and maybe get a LF platoon player.

Anything beyond that will be jaw dropping.
This is the best plan IMO
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
34,927
Liked Posts:
19,055
The one thing i am confident in- Theo and Jed won't overreact to today's deals by doing something stupid just for the sake of doing something.
 

Boobaby1

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,236
Liked Posts:
1,180
The one thing i am confident in- Theo and Jed won't overreact to today's deals by doing something stupid just for the sake of doing something.

Lets hope not. But you have to know that they only need to look south on the map, and know that their task got a little harder to catch the team they are pursuing the heaviest.

Would like something to happen on the free agent market to shore up the staff. That can always take a turn for the worse, especially when you have teams come out of nowhere and stake their claim.

Rolling out the red carpet doesn't always work. Rolling out the green carpet usually does.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
The one thing i am confident in- Theo and Jed won't overreact to today's deals by doing something stupid just for the sake of doing something.

You mean anymore, right?
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
34,927
Liked Posts:
19,055
Lets hope not. But you have to know that they only need to look south on the map, and know that their task got a little harder to catch the team they are pursuing the heaviest.

Would like something to happen on the free agent market to shore up the staff. That can always take a turn for the worse, especially when you have teams come out of nowhere and stake their claim.

Rolling out the red carpet doesn't always work. Rolling out the green carpet usually does.

Well, I am sure they know other teams are not standing still. if anything, i expect more moves by NL Central teams because the Cubs are coming.

Cards' acquisition is good, but they compensated for their loss of Taveras, and lost Miller in the process. But they dealt from strength, so it's a good move for them. We just have to hope Heyward continues to hit like he has the past two years. The cards now have an asst hitting coach to help turn him around, as he did with javy Baez. :)
 

TC in Mississippi

CCS Staff
Joined:
Oct 22, 2014
Posts:
5,305
Liked Posts:
1,816
What stupid moves have they made?

Edwin Jackson, of course.

Really about the only one that I can think of and you can argue that a pitcher that lost during a period where the club was trying to lose didn't hurt anything. The crazy think is that his contract is still almost certainly tradeable. I guess you argue Sveum was bad move but I wouldn't. Growing pains is all.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Well, I am sure they know other teams are not standing still. if anything, i expect more moves by NL Central teams because the Cubs are coming.

Cards' acquisition is good, but they compensated for their loss of Taveras, and lost Miller in the process. But they dealt from strength, so it's a good move for them. We just have to hope Heyward continues to hit like he has the past two years. The cards now have an asst hitting coach to help turn him around, as he did with javy Baez. :)

im sure the front office of the cards are scared knowing the "cubs are coming" even though they are all unproven. :rolleyes:


Sent from My 1998 Palm Pilot Using Tapatalk
 

Top