2015 Cubs Offseason Discussion

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,667
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
http://m.cubs.mlb.com/news/article/101274544/phil-rogers-cubs-trying-to-add-to-solid-pitching-core

Take the 2014 performances of Jake Arrieta, Kyle Hendricks and Tsuyoshi Wada, then add in those of free-agent targets Jon Lester and Jason Hammel. Here's what you get: a 47-33 record and 2.81 ERA over 702 1/3 innings. The secondary numbers include a 1.09 WHIP and 8.3 strikeouts per nine innings.
What a combination.

Had any National League team had a starting rotation that put up those totals last season, it would have ranked first in ERA, first in WHIP and second in strikeouts per nine innings.
Lester and Hammel were used because they represent the combination of starters that president, baseball operations Theo Epstein and executive vice president, general manager Jed Hoyer are looking to add this offseason -- a big-ticket, front-end guy and a worker bee. Instead of Hammel, the Cubs could wind up with someone like Jake Peavy or Justin Masterson. If they did, the numbers would be a little less impressive.
With Peavy, the projected rotation would be coming off a season in which its five pieces went 44-35 with a 2.90 ERA, 728 2/3 innings, 1.14 WHIP and 7.9 strikeouts per nine innings. With Masterson, the numbers are 44-31, 3.23, 654 2/3 innings, 1.19 WHIP and 8.2 strikeouts per nine innings.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,667
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
It seems to me that they should reacquire Hammel on a team friendly deal after getting Lester. If they fail to get Lester then they should look at signing 1 year flips. Masterson would be a prime target then.
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
It seems to me that they should reacquire Hammel on a team friendly deal after getting Lester. If they fail to get Lester then they should look at signing 1 year flips. Masterson would be a prime target then.
If their fall back is to sign 1 yr flips. Then there no need to sign russell martin or a LFer to be wasting another year
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
@JonHeymanCBS: icymi: marlins on same page for $ (13 yrs, $325M?), but sides still working on non-monetary issues. cbsprt.co/116igMC

Crazy...
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
@JonHeymanCBS: icymi: marlins on same page for $ (13 yrs, $325M?), but sides still working on non-monetary issues. cbsprt.co/116igMC

Crazy...

$25 million per year...$325 total. Done and Done. If I am stanton
 

JZsportsfan

New member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2013
Posts:
2,503
Liked Posts:
674
Location:
Chicago
I'd honestly rather see Stanton go to the Yankees than waste away in Miami
 

Shawon0Meter

PLAYOFFS?!?
Donator
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
5,444
Liked Posts:
2,774
Location:
Minnesota
In 99.9% of the cases, baseball players don't get a lot of money in endorsements.

$300 million is $300 million.

I'll step up and be honest.

$300 million today without any risks involved means I never play say on a playoff team or maybe even a .500 team. Sign me up. There is a price where winning doesn't matter at all. $300 million is certainly a number above that price.

Anyone else want to be honest?
I'm speaking truthfully here....I'd rather have like a 5 year deal worth over $100 million and then see where things are, see what makes me happy at the time. Sure you risk injury or your skill falling off but it's still so much money that you can live the good life and pass millions down to your kids. At some point a lot of freaking money is just a lot of freaking money.

It might be that it's easy for guy like me to say that, basically as someone who's living check to check that will never see offers like that, but I really feel like I'm being honest.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
I'm speaking truthfully here....I'd rather have like a 5 year deal worth over $100 million and then see where things are, see what makes me happy at the time. Sure you risk injury or your skill falling off but it's still so much money that you can live the good life and pass millions down to your kids. At some point a lot of freaking money is just a lot of freaking money.

It might be that it's easy for guy like me to say that, basically as someone who's living check to check that will never see offers like that, but I really feel like I'm being honest.

:)

Given how many lottery winners go bankrupt I'm not sure 100 is enough

But you are an honest man. :)
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
Surely it all isn't guaranteed?
Yes it is. ...... baseball contracts are guaranteed

At 25 per and he continues to hit, Miami will be able to trade him in 2-3 yrs to a big market team looking to make a splash. .
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
Just read the orioles not sure about offering De Aza arbitration , maybe the cubs could kick his tires for LF if they can't get anyone better..
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
Its a lot of money to give to a guy with knee injuries. I just have a bad feeling about that contract with Miami. You havent even seen how he has come back from that freak accident that occurred last year.
 

Parade_Rain

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
9,995
Liked Posts:
3,624
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
Exactly. How is he going to be mentally at the plate?
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
Its a lot of money to give to a guy with knee injuries. I just have a bad feeling about that contract with Miami. You havent even seen how he has come back from that freak accident that occurred last year.
I agree.. with 2 yrs of control left, why look to extend now ?
At least wait til mid season to see how he bounces back..

I personally think the kid future destination has DH written all over it, marlins future could be way better off without him by trading him for a big haul ..
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,667
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
he Cubs and Red Sox will meet with Jon Lester this week, tweets Hall of Fame journalist Peter Gammons. The Yankees could play the role of dark horse. While other sources have reported that Lester is willing to sign quickly, Gammons suggests the process may last into December.

So the Yanks have some spending limitations going on. Boston is at 114 mil but have avg 150+. They can take on another 40 mil of contract.

http://espn.go.com/boston/mlb/story...x-show-jon-lester-money?ex_cid=espnapi_public

The take here is it will take 130 mil to even get into talks with Lester. John Hendry has a long term standing business policy of not signing players over 30 to mega deals. We see where Theo got his business model from.

So the question is who will break the model here. Theo or John?
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,667
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
Like I've said no reason not to start Kris from day 1

The problem is Boras doesn't want his clients to extend. And he really doesn't have to also unless he can make more over the 7 years of control vs the arb process. But with Bryant's talent he should get into heavy paydays by then.

If they start him in mid apr 2015 he would be at 500k 2016 500k 2017 he would be up for super 2 and that makes him a 4 year arb case. Yould have to expect he would be looing at 2-5 mil at this point then x2 that each year.

They could ink him to a 10 year deal off the bat and buy up 3 years of control for 100 mil but I'm not sure if Boras would go with that.
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
The problem is Boras doesn't want his clients to extend. And he really doesn't have to also unless he can make more over the 7 years of control vs the arb process. But with Bryant's talent he should get into heavy paydays by then.

If they start him in mid apr 2015 he would be at 500k 2016 500k 2017 he would be up for super 2 and that makes him a 4 year arb case. Yould have to expect he would be looing at 2-5 mil at this point then x2 that each year.

They could ink him to a 10 year deal off the bat and buy up 3 years of control for 100 mil but I'm not sure if Boras would go with that.
Guess boras cant have it both ways then...
 

Top