2015 Cubs Offseason Discussion

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
No team would get him without...just saying

It would take more than Bryant to get the caliber starter of Chris Sale. One can say "ohszz he mightsZ getsZ injuredzz and teh stuffzzz" which is just fodder. It would start with bryant who by the way is still not a proven MLB player.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Give me a break. Avisail Garcia was lost for more than half the season, that is a wee bit more significant than Austin Jackson missing two weeks.

But its okay, I loved seeing the overrated Pussies get swept.



this.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Quintana is very underrated.

But, it should go without saying that the Sox aren't trading Q, or Sale.

I wouldnt trade sale because he could get injured and we wouldnt get anything good...especially an unproven MLB spec in bryant. :sarcasm:
 

JZsportsfan

New member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2013
Posts:
2,503
Liked Posts:
674
Location:
Chicago
Not even a Sox hater. Just pointing out the fact that Jose Quintana is not a top 5 LH. I like how you act like Liriano isn't good, and your telling me I'm hating. Wasn't flat out saying Liriano is better than Quintana, but he's in the discussion with some of the better LH in the league

Why would you take Quintana over Bumgartner? Cole Hamels? Even Matt Moore? Lee + Liriano sure I'd give you due to Lee's age, and Liriano's consistency issues. And now that Moore is injured, but stats still very similar if not better
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
Not even a Sox hater. Just pointing out the fact that Jose Quintana is not a top 5 LH. I like how you act like Liriano isn't good

But he is? He was 9th in fWAR as starters. The only LHP ahead of him were Price, Kershaw, Lester and Sale....which put him 5th. But, yeah, totally not a top 5 lefty.

Yeah, Liriano and that 1.6 fWAR sure is impressive.
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
But he is? He was 9th in fWAR as starters. The only LHP ahead of him were Price, Kershaw, Lester and Sale....which put him 5th. But, yeah, totally not a top 5 lefty.

Yeah, Liriano and that 1.6 fWAR sure is impressive.
fWAR..... How far did fWAR ranking get Price Lester and Kershaw in their playoff starts..lol

Not that I wouldn't want them starting for my team but its crazy how this game of baseball is when 3 of the top starters in the game this year all lose their playoff game... that not even including scherzer and Verlander who are up there
 

JZsportsfan

New member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2013
Posts:
2,503
Liked Posts:
674
Location:
Chicago
I guarantee the White Sox would trade Quintana for Bumgarnter. Coles Hamels maybe not due to his contract, but pitching wise he is superior. Matt Moore before his injury was better, time will tell if he will continue to be.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
But he is? He was 9th in fWAR as starters. The only LHP ahead of him were Price, Kershaw, Lester and Sale....which put him 5th. But, yeah, totally not a top 5 lefty.

Yeah, Liriano and that 1.6 fWAR sure is impressive.

if im in an elmination 1 game playoff im taking Q all day long even on short rest. i hope liriano goes to the tigers or a team like that and gets a big contract for his 120 pitch count in the 4th inning


Sent from My 1998 Palm Pilot Using Tapatalk
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,671
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
Liriano has been injure prone. That is the 1 major hit on him but that factor should keep his price tag down.

I believe they will be targeting Lester. I also believe they are viewing Doubront and Turner as the 4/5 this off season with Jochish in the mix in S/T. They will look to shed Wood and Jackson.

So they will need 1 TOR.

I do not see Liriano on their radar.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
It is funny watching fans of a team that has had a great run of good fortune on that front complain about injuries.

We did, and I am not complaining. But it's funny you ignoring it to make the other Chicago team look bad and the northside Chicago team look better.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
The Sox still wouldn't make the playoffs without the injuries. Lol. And yes, sale will et a major injury in my opinion. Call me Nostradamus bitches. And no one said Bryant wouldn't be traded for sale. I said the Cubs wouldn't include Bryant in a trade for Quintana and I would bet my left nut on that. That's my good one


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
The Sox make the playoffs without the injuries. They ran out of gas because of them.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
The Sox make the playoffs without the injuries. They ran out of gas because of them.

No, at full health they were not better then any of the playoff teams. That's like saying the Cubs would have won the World Series if prior and wood didn't go down. Not factual


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
No, at full health they were not better then any of the playoff teams. That's like saying the Cubs would have won the World Series if prior and wood didn't go down. Not factual


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes they were but keep believing that they were not.
 

beckdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 31, 2012
Posts:
11,750
Liked Posts:
3,741
Why does every third topic on the cubs board turn into a sox topic? The sox aren't trading Sale to begin with. That's never been Kenny/Sox FO's MO. The only "top tier" starter(using that loosely) I ever remember then trading was Esteban Loaiza and they got Jose Contreras back in that trade. I don't see why they'd trade Quintana either. Both are 25 and if you pair them with hopefully Rodon being a good that's a very solid staff. It leaves them a bunch of room to find 4/5 starters.

I've made this comment before but I think the nationals might be a team that makes sense for the cubs to trade with. First of all they have basically said they aren't going to re-sign Desmond at SS because he wants too much money. Jordan Zimmermann is a 2016 FA. Gio Gonzalez has I believe 2 option years in 2017/18. Doug Fister is arb 3 next year and a 2016 FA. Stephen Strasburg is a 2017 FA. Lucas Giolito is a 65 grade by mlb.com and A.J. Cole is a 55 which should make them roughly 2/3 starters maybe more if they live up to the hype. Zimmerman was arguably a better pitcher than Strasburg this year. 2016 in particular is going to be tough for them as LaRoche, Zimmerman, Soriano, Desmond, Span(if they pick up his 2015 option), Fister, Thorton, and Clippard are all FAs. To have to pay all those players in 2016 and then find the money for Strasburg in 2017 seems difficult at their current payroll levels. Giolito finished in A ball so he's 2-3 years away. Cole however finished in AAA and could theoretically be ready for the majors to start next season.

What I would do is try to work a trade around Strasburg/Baez. It almost certainly would require more than just Baez but in theory he would give them a replacement option for Desmond. Asdrubal Cabrera who they traded for to play 2B is a 2015 FA. Baez gives them some leverage against Desmond. If Desmond doesn't play ball, you can deal him for something else, play Baez at SS/2B and re-sign Cabrera at SS/2B. And while losing Strasburg would hurt them, you're still talking about a rotation featuring Zimmerman, Fister and Gonzalez as your top 3 pitchers. That's by no means "bad." Cole could come up and be a solid 4/5. Tanner Roark who's 27 but still pre-arb pitched really well for them with a 2.85 ERA over roughly 200 IP. Additionally, Giolito gives you some top end in 2-3 years.

From the cubs perspective, I've voiced my displeasure on Baez but even if you just look at 2015, you can argue Valbuena is the better option at 2B with presumably Olt filling 3B until May or whenever they decide to move up Bryant. Strasburg would obviously be a huge upgrade in the rotation and at 25 he fits well within that Castro and Rizzo core. And since he's still in arbitration he's relatively cheapish for the next 2 years. You're probably talking about around $7 mil in 2015 and $12-15 mil in 2016. That buys you some time until both tv contracts come up in 2019 I believe. Strasburg, Arrieta and Shields/Lester/Scherzer to go with Hendricks and Wood/Turner/Doubront/<whomever> would be a very solid rotation. From there you have Russell and Castro as SS/2B however they want to figure that out.

I'm not sure exactly what else it would take but if we use the 2011/12 trade of Mat Latos as a guide he went for Yonder Alonso, Brad Boxberger, Yasmani Grandal and Edinson Volquez. Volquez wasn't viewed highly at that point as he finished the 2011 season with a 5.29 ERA following a 2010 season with a 4 ERA. So, I'd call him organizational filler similar to what Justin Grimm was in the Garza deal. Boxberger was a decently well thought of reliever from what I can find from the time. He rated #9 on their prospect list coming into that season. Given that he's probably a similar value to someone like Corey Black or Paul Blackburn. Grandal and Alonso were the two big fish of the trade. Alonso ranked #33 going into 2012 on baseball americas top 100 and Grandal was #53. You could argue that Baez who was #5 going into 2014 is worth a similar value to those 2. So, it conceivably could cost as little as Baez plus one of their back of the rotation types in Doubront/Turner/Wood/Beeler...etc and someone like say Paul Blackburn. Even if you add someone like Vogelbach or Candelario to that deal it still seems very good from the cubs perspective. I don't think realistically you'd see the cubs add one of their top 8 or so guys to that given the feeling that Baez is a potential star and is basically on the cusp of the majors full time.

Whether or not the Nats feel high on Baez we obviously don't know but that's how I'd like to see them approach the logjam of players in the middle infield. I'm obviously down on Baez but even if he becomes what people expect is him for Strasburg really that bad of a deal? You're talking about a 26 year old with a career 3.02/2.84 ERA/FIP to go with a 10.34/2.30 k/9 and bb/9. Imagine giving Bosio that to work with rather than the cast off's we've seen thus far.That's basically as close as you're going to get for trading for a Clayton Kershaw who's 1 year older and has a career 2.48/2.73 ERA/FIP with 9.44/2.77 k/9 and bb/9 though his walk rate has dramatically dropped the past couple of years which in turn has allowed his ERA to drop around a run. And obviously we don't know that Strasburg is available. But, we do know that there is some potential issues for the Nats at SS assuming they don't change their mind on Desmond's re-signing. And we do know that 2016 is going to hit them pretty hard salary wise while they have a number of good pitchers currently. As such, it makes sense on paper.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
I would put a 1 percent chance of that happening


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

beckdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 31, 2012
Posts:
11,750
Liked Posts:
3,741
I would put a 1 percent chance of that happening


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And that's different from the sox trading Sale how? Hell, even someone like Heyward and Upton who the media says the Braves are likely to trade has maybe a 5% chance to any given team.
 

Top