Base Runs also showed that the Rangers success was based more on luck than on actual talent so they overachieved there, in Pythagorean record and in run differential which are the three leading indicators of winning percentage. When a team's record is vastly different from these indicators there is assumed to be a lot of luck, good or bad, involved. When you say "keep it" do you mean you ignore these numbers? Help me understand this. All of the indicators told us that Texas was a vastly inferior team to Toronto, who actually underperformed their numbers in these three categories, and they dominated Texas. Anything can happen in the playoffs of course, and in a five game series inferior teams often win, but in this case the better team won and the numbers give us indication of why. Do you dispute all of that?