- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,947
- Liked Posts:
- 3,118
I asked what team made the playoffs under these situations. Every single post either directly mentions the postseason or implicitly with the definition of success you laid out at the start of the thread.My God you are a freaking clown.
You asked specifically what teams have cut payroll and improved, I provide you the list and then you whine that my reading comprehension sucks when I provide you the list of teams that improved under your scenario??
And I've shown how neither of those teams faced the specific problems that the Cubs faced. You continue to ignore that fact.And even then, two of the teams I listed MADE THE PLAYOFFS!
You are a joke.
I tell you that I don't care that the team has cut payroll, that I consider that an equal part of the problem but you keep whining and whining and whining and whining and whining and whining about the payroll being cut, so I get tired of it and show you the facts on teams that have cut payroll and still improved.
So you change your story.
"Well now that KB proved me wrong yet again, I really didn't mean just improvement, I meant that the teams should make the playoffs, nevermind that two of the teams listed actually did make the playoffs."
Show me a post where I directly said that I only asked for the Cubs or any other team to just "improve" given these situations. Then you might prove me for the first time in this thread. Until then all you have given me is more evidence of your inability to read accurately what other people write.