Dunn? Are you kidding me? You really are Special person. Dunn is a GREAT hitter, but he was still playing OF then, making him almost worthless. Soriano was probably twice as good as Dunn.
Dunn out produced Soriano is virtually every stat catagory outside of average and stolen bases.
I like how you say Dunn was playing OF then..which made him almsot worthless, yet he was a better hitter than Soriano....who also played the OF.....
Braun is another joke. Didn't play a full year and played 3B.
So what?
He still out produced Soriano. Trend Braun's numbers over a full season and he destroys him. AS if Braun playing 3B matters at all? Braun by the end of that season had established himself as one of the better hitters in the game.
Fielder... meh. 1B kills him for me. He could be argued... maybe.
MAYBE?
This is Fielders line from 2007: 288/395/618 OPS+ of 157. He hit 50 HR's.
Soriano couldn't touch Fielder that season.
Lowell was very good, but not nearly Soriano good.
What does that even mean?
Soriano was rarely in the top 10 of ANY statistical catagory that season. Hell, he was rarely scraping Top 10 ranks in JUST the NL. Counting, sabre, WAR or otherwise. He was hurt early in the season and moved to LF....where he's a marginal fielder at best regardless of what UZR tells us.
Lowell, while not hitting as many HR's as usual played great 3B that season.
Also what is it with you and not understanding how defense works? I mean do you just think each player is the same on defense no matter what? How could anyone EVER list Adam Dunn as top 20 POSITION player.
For one season? Sure. It could happen. Is he on the list if pitchers are involved? No. But I'll take Dunn's offense at the risk of his defense any day of the week.
LOL at bringing up defense at all as if that helps Soriano in any way shape or form.
Soriano is defensivly bad. So is Dunn. Then again Dunn makes a living mashing the **** out of the ball every year of his career except this one.
Oh yeah. I forgot one. Ryan Howard. That's 20.
I again ask you, since you have completely avoided it: What did Soriano do and what is the reasoning for putting him in the Top 12-15 players in baseball that season? What's the rationale? What's the backing? Statistics or otherwise.
You can sit there and feebly try to shit on my list...but you have yet to explain why Soriano was so good in 2007. I can't find a reason for it.
I assume you'll grasp on to some idiotic assertion that since Soriano plays LF that makes him somehow more valuable or that he's "an above average defender".
Two problems with that:
1. Regardless of where Sori ranks relative to the positional strength of LF that doesn't somehow make him "good" or "better" than other guys in the game as actual
players. I guess it makes him somewhat a valuable commodity for his position in that season but that doesn't raise his stock above people who are better than him at a deeper position. That doesn't make Soriano "better" in general, it just makes him one of the stronger in a weak group. It's faulty logic that could be used to argue the Seahawks>Packers this last season prior to the playoffs starting, even though the Packers were clearly a better team in a better division, the SeaHawks werethe best of a weak bunch. Who cares? I'm not comparing Sori to other left fielders. I'm comparing him to other baseball players.
2. Soriano is not a good fielder. You latch on to this UZR stat as though it's gospel. It's not. Soriano is a bad defensive outfielder. His range factor doesn't mean shit to me if I can't trust him to make plays once he gets there or even judge how to get there correctly.