- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2010
- Posts:
- 4,967
- Liked Posts:
- 697
errors certainly dont help a player's case for being a great defender...
07 may be the year in question...but it doesnt validate soriano's defense as being anywhere near good or to be used as an advantage...
soriano's defensive WAR has only been above one twice(once with the nationals and once with the cubs in 07) besides that it has been around 0 or much lower than that..
furthermore, his defensive chances(putouts+assists+errors) has been in the low 200s and his ch was relatively good in 07 as a LF with 269 in around 125 games...but since then its been pretty bad...
Carl Crawford is one of the best defenders in the league and he's a LF(his fielding percentage and ch are great)
Matt Holliday is a pretty good defender at LF(was better than soriano defensively at least in 07...higher fielding % and a ch above 300)
and i understand that LF is not an easy defensive position...but i dont think that is the reason for soriano's mainly subpar defense as a cub
his defensive WAR was absurdly bad when he was a second baseman when he was with the yankees and rangers...
please...lets not act this like guy has ever been anywhere near a gold glove guy
I'm not saying that he is a gold glover. I don't know who would say that. Yes, Crawford is a good defender and Holliday is decent. However, that's two out of 30. It doesn't take someone that good to be a top defender. Although now Cargo is a LFer, so that changes things slightly.
I'm just not a huge fan of BR's WAR. I'm a fangraphs guy. I'm not going to say that what you are saying is wrong because I simply am not familiar with BR's WAR and it's not fair to compare the two.
All I am saying is that his defense in 07 was good for a LFer. That is what gave him a lot of his value & made him a top player in the league.
He plays LF cause hes a bad fielder, not the other way around.
And just about every other team has a bad fielder playing LF. Compared to his peers, he really isn't all that terrible.