- Joined:
- Jun 7, 2011
- Posts:
- 18,077
- Liked Posts:
- 3,472
- Location:
- Chicago
Joe Ricketts merely bankrolls the team but is definitely linked to the team regardless. There's no real pussyfooting around it.
Bribe time.
Bribe time.
i dont know how any fan and even cub fan can side with ricketts.
Joe Ricketts merely bankrolls the team but is definitely linked to the team regardless. There's no real pussyfooting around it.
Bribe time.
The Wrigley Field visiting clubhouse is terrible | HardballTalk
Periodic "Wrigley Field sucks" article.
Totally not free. Cliffs notes version?
LOL at this....
"While local officials estimate that this year event in Kansas City carried an economic impact of about $60 million..."
Jeez...local Kansas City officials say the hosting of this year's All Star Game was a success...gee, ya think?
And I have no idea what is meant by "economic impact". Kind of a vague statement. Point being that if Bud Selig thinks hosting the All-Star game will convince the bankrupt City of Chicago to pony up $500 million dollars to give to a money-hoarding MLB franchise, then I have some stadium property in Bridgeview that I'd like to sell...
I am not an expert on Chicago politics, but I think the scope and money involved in the Wrigley Field issue makes it a city-wide/mayoral issue. I think it would be a bad political move for anyone to be on the approving side of using city funds for Wrigley Field. The timing is terrible.
I agree with you that one ASG isn't going to matter much in the grand scheme of things. But a renovated Wrigley will potentially bring more business to the neighborhood, and I'm sure the neighbors want to see their property values continue to rise, and the businesses won't mind potentially bigger profits either. So the trick isn't to convince the city that the ASG is important...based on what little I know about how Chicago politics work, the trick should be to convince all the neighbors to vote for guys who will funnel some money to the Ricketts for Wrigley-related activities and for businesses to shuttle a few extra "campaign contributions" towards favorable politicians. What say ye?
I don't pay *that* much attention to Chicago politics, since I don't live in Cook, but isn't Chicago, like nearly everywhere else, broke?