- Joined:
- Aug 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 8,292
- Liked Posts:
- 3,054
Didnt know the article was days old
sry
The logistics of scheduling 80 plus games in a shared facility is very difficult. Putting 40 games on the south side and 40 out here makes better sense than Milwaukee.
It does, but that assumes that Reinsdorf will allow the Cubs to play at the Cell (I don't think that's the case) and also that the Cubs would want to force fans to trek even more out of the way of public transit and a major tourist spot. I honestly don't think it's viable.
Reinsdorf has said he won't allow the Cubs to play at USCF because the Cubs wouldn't let the Sox play at Wrigley when the new park was being built.
Reinsdorf has said he won't allow the Cubs to play at USCF because the Cubs wouldn't let the Sox play at Wrigley when the new park was being built.
It does, but that assumes that Reinsdorf will allow the Cubs to play at the Cell (I don't think that's the case) and also that the Cubs would want to force fans to trek even more out of the way of public transit and a major tourist spot. I honestly don't think it's viable.
The Sox played in old Comiskey while the new park was under construction across the street.
Why would a park in the burbs hurt the Cubs?
@CarrieMuskat
Ricketts family will pay for Wrigley renovations. #Cubs