CHIBEAR
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 5, 2020
- Posts:
- 1,397
- Liked Posts:
- 1,005
just listen to what Cutler said on it. hes actually been through it. it helps to watch. to see how andy prepares, to see the team win and lose
No he hasn't .
just listen to what Cutler said on it. hes actually been through it. it helps to watch. to see how andy prepares, to see the team win and lose
??No he hasn't .
There are 2 rookies on the OL so no idea how good or how bad it will be.. Let Dalton find out for a few games how they are.Do you think our OL looked as bad your describing last season? The point where a QB would learn such bad habits?
just listen to what Cutler said on it. hes actually been through it. it helps to watch. to see how andy prepares, to see the team win and lose
There are 2 rookies on the OL so no idea how good or how bad it will be.. Let Dalton find out for a few games how they are.
If Fields turns out to be what we all hope, then he is going to be able to solve out QB problems for the next 10-15 years.. so do you really think in 10 years from now if Fields is a top 5 QB every year we are going to be looking back thinking if only he started 6 games earlier?
There is at least 1 rookie starting on the OL. The chances of him being worse than Leno are slim. The second rookie needs to beat out a veteran. The Bears get Daniels back. Do you think they are going to be worse than last year? I think with Daniels back they are a slightly improved group.There are 2 rookies on the OL so no idea how good or how bad it will be.. Let Dalton find out for a few games how they are.
If Fields turns out to be what we all hope, then he is going to be able to solve out QB problems for the next 10-15 years.. so do you really think in 10 years from now if Fields is a top 5 QB every year we are going to be looking back thinking if only he started 6 games earlier?
Jay is suggesting Fields sit to learn on the sideline. That’s what he did when he was drafted and Jake Plummer started. So yeah, Cutler has been through that.Just because Jay was also drafted doesn't mean hes been through what Fields is going through.
He even admits he didn't watch him in college
yes we are starting a rookie at the most important position on the OL.. and also he played most at RT.. so we can all hope he works out but until he actually plays real games we wont know.. Again having fields sit 4-6 games to let the OL gel is going to do nothing to hurt his development.There is at least 1 rookie starting on the OL. The chances of him being worse than Leno are slim. The second rookie needs to beat out a veteran. The Bears get Daniels back. Do you think they are going to be worse than last year? I think with Daniels back they are a slightly improved group.
If Fields is ready after TC and preseason, the Bears don’t need to “let” Dalton start just to find out how the O line is.
Jay is suggesting Fields sit to learn on the sideline. That’s what he did when he was drafted and Jake Plummer started. So yeah, Cutler has been through that.
And like I said the chances of Jenkins being worse than Leno are slim. So we already know what the OL might look like. They might be slightly better with Daniels coming in. So if we might know what the OL looks like and Fields is ready, what is the point of sitting him 4-6 games? It’s not like we have 3 or 4 new offensive lineman and they really need to gel together.yes we are starting a rookie at the most important position on the OL.. and also he played most at RT.. so we can all hope he works out but until he actually plays real games we wont know.. Again having fields sit 4-6 games to let the OL gel is going to do nothing to hurt his development.
We are not winning the super bowl this year regardless who starts, so might as well make sure you develop him correctly
I don’t think it has anything to do with that. He’s simply stating he saw benefits from sitting and that’s why he’s making his opinion that Fields shouldn’t start.Yeah he sat 16 years ago dont see the relevance at all considering how much the rules have changed and how football have become a year round sport for qbs these days and as I mentioned he never even saw him play in college .
I don’t necessarily agree with your last statement. If Fields comes in and has a Herbert-lite type season and the defense bounces back and is a top 5-10 unit…you never know. That’s a lot of ifs and I’m not saying I expect it, but it could happen. It’s not like they’re the 20 Jets.yes we are starting a rookie at the most important position on the OL.. and also he played most at RT.. so we can all hope he works out but until he actually plays real games we wont know.. Again having fields sit 4-6 games to let the OL gel is going to do nothing to hurt his development.
We are not winning the super bowl this year regardless who starts, so might as well make sure you develop him correctly
They may have if he was available at the time they got Foles. Dalton was released after the draft.Any poor soul that tuned in to watch the Bengals play the last few seasons he was there will know that Big Red has been cannon fodder for quite some time. It's probably why the Bears should have just signed him last year over trading a pick for Foles, but Bears gonna Bears.
There is a lot of "mights" in your argument there. The point of sitting his is that it takes away the unknown of how the OL is playing.. Sitting him for a few games will not hurt his development at all. Most of the best QBs have sat for half to a full year.. So sitting obviously does not hurt developing QBsAnd like I said the chances of Jenkins being worse than Leno are slim. So we already know what the OL might look like. They might be slightly better with Daniels coming in. So if we might know what the OL looks like and Fields is ready, what is the point of sitting him 4-6 games? It’s not like we have 3 or 4 new offensive lineman and they really need to gel together.
There’s also a lot of mights, maybes and unknowns for your argument. What if the OL never gels this season? Are you not going to play Fields at all even if he’s 100% ready? What’s the difference between him starting game 1 vs game 6? Do you think that’s going to hurt his development?There is a lot of "mights" in your argument there. The point of sitting his is that it takes away the unknown of how the OL is playing.. Sitting him for a few games will not hurt his development at all. Most of the best QBs have sat for half to a full year.. So sitting obviously does not hurt developing QBs
There is absolutely no unknowns with my plan because you let the OL play first and make a decision on how to move Fields into the starting role based on what the OL actually does.. If the OL plays well after 4-6 games then you let him play. Simple as that.There’s also a lot of mights, maybes and unknowns for your argument. What if the OL never gels this season? Are you not going to play Fields at all even if he’s 100% ready? What’s the difference between him starting game 1 vs game 6? Do you think that’s going to hurt his development?
Opinions on this subject may be interesting, but they count for zero. The coach and GM will not start Fields.. Red Rifle will start and Fields will come in once the new OL has solidified and Fields has clearly outplayed Dalton. This is what Nagy and Pace want to do.