oober
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,883
- Liked Posts:
- 794
Give me a 3rd or better, done deal.
The fact that they went out and signed Ray McDonald before his situation was settled, and the allegations against him being far worse than Bennett or Marshall, makes your argument invalid. They don't give two fucks about distractions or character. Quite frankly, if they trade Bennett, after trading Marshall, when the obvious problem on the field is Cutler, then I have no fucking clue what they value or what their plan is.
Bennett for brockers and a 5th?
They already signed Jared Cook to a monster FA deal 2 years ago.
Cutler, Forte, Bennett + 1st for MARIOTA.
I liked to get wined and dined before I get FUCKED.
Aaron Leming - For what it's worth, I have had multiple confirmations that Martellus Bennett is indeed on the trading block per @AdamSchefter #Bears
6:39pm - 29 Apr 15
Wonder if he knows the asking price.
Everyone should be available for the right price. I'm not sure why this is news.
I will say this not knowing for sure what this offense will look like this season.
If the Bears are going to be a power running/ball control type offensive team, they don't necessarily need a top receiving TE. It isn't a position you would want to tie up a bunch of money and create salary cap issues moving forward. I like Bennett and enjoy the type of player he is, but depending on the type of offense you run, he might be a luxury and not a need.
Saying that, I would be shocked if the Bears traded him, since there isn't another TE option on this team.
Speculation is most the Bears could get is a 5, because of Bennett's "personality. Honestly, surprised this has been rumored sooner. He's just as odd as Marshall, had issues last camp, and got into it with Long this offseason.