Bears Scrapping The Arlington Hts Stadium Plan

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,407
Liked Posts:
7,605
My buddy's cousin's pal's neighbor's friend's uncle who works for the city said he saw on facebook the deal was scrapped because Caleb Williams demanded to play in a dome built under lake michigan.
It is going to be ideal when the Bears first game in their new stadium (The Fishbowl) is covered by a national Game of the Week audience where it seems like the Bears created statues of past Bear greats outside the stadium, only to discover that those 'statues' are actually victims with cement shoes of Al Capone.

fVdnaQyQHaG1?w=186&h=180&c=7&r=0&o=5&dpr=1.5&pid=1.jpg
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,407
Liked Posts:
7,605
I think (hope) the Bears approach the new stadium the same way as JF1/1.1 pick, that is, do the better deal. Both locations are premium spots. If one deal becomes a materially better financial deal, do it. If the 1.1 pick can be traded for a king's ransom, trade it. If Fields can be traded for a #1, trade him. Once all offers are on the table, I think the decision(s) make themselves.
So, are you thinking that Chicago will throw in Gary, Indiana to sweeten the deal?
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,407
Liked Posts:
7,605
Idk man. I was reading some AH city council minutes when the initial news broke. People of AH were PISSED off about a singular new apartment complex. I’m thinking a football stadium isn’t going to be welcomed. And seems AH agrees by not offering any tax incentives
There is still time. All the AH city council members can be voted out before a decision is made.
 

Bearly

Guest
Arlington Heights must've really been given the Bears hell if they're choosing to working the city of Chicago and Cook County.
Arlington Heights is fully within Cook County and surrounded by cities still within same.

I suspect this is about the property tax fight going on at the track sight. They're $100M/yr apart right now. This could just be a tactic to get the burb to relent.
 

baredown

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 20, 2013
Posts:
728
Liked Posts:
647
This isn’t simply about building a new stadium. It’s about the Bears owning an extensive real estate development with a stadium at its core. It’s Kroenke 2.0, even down to using a race track property as the development space. That type of real estate development isn't happening down in Chicago, where public property is involved, nor in any of the other mentioned suburban locations, where there’s not enough open land.

The difference in assessed value that’s being argued about is enough to fight over, but not enough to kill the project. In the end, it will be Arlington Heights, simply because there are no alternatives that will give the Bears what they really want…
 

Bust

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 5, 2020
Posts:
9,549
Liked Posts:
4,298
This isn’t simply about building a new stadium. It’s about the Bears owning an extensive real estate development with a stadium at its core.

Cubs Gallagher Way 2.0?

Ricketts are the best ownership in Chicago boyz
 

UChiLAbear

My Happy Place
Joined:
Dec 17, 2021
Posts:
2,726
Liked Posts:
1,288
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. UCLA Bruins
My buddy's cousin's pal's neighbor's friend's uncle who works for the city said he saw on facebook the deal was scrapped because Caleb Williams demanded to play in a dome built under lake michigan.
I think I know that guy.....he's the one always hanging around the water cooler, right?
 

Heidenlarm

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
4,380
Liked Posts:
2,245
Location:
Chicago
Yea..I heard about that...the problem for me is, I also heard to get a ticket to a Bear game there, one has to be a certified Scuba Diver....any truth to this?
I,uh, were gonna need a bigger boat.
 

UChiLAbear

My Happy Place
Joined:
Dec 17, 2021
Posts:
2,726
Liked Posts:
1,288
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. UCLA Bruins
I think they are trying to bluff....I think Arlington Heights is still the plan...

The school districts are being greedy.
School districts being greedy? Who would of ever thunk it?
 

truthbedamned

I don't have a party
Donator
Joined:
Aug 31, 2014
Posts:
16,844
Liked Posts:
9,909
Location:
Socialist Republic of California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
School districts being greedy? Who would of ever thunk it?
Yeah they need more money to pay their superintendents 350,000 dollars a year instead of the measly 250K they make now. Teachers can still buy their own classroom supplies with their own money That 60k salary is fine.
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,580
Liked Posts:
14,828
This isn’t simply about building a new stadium. It’s about the Bears owning an extensive real estate development with a stadium at its core. It’s Kroenke 2.0, even down to using a race track property as the development space. That type of real estate development isn't happening down in Chicago, where public property is involved, nor in any of the other mentioned suburban locations, where there’s not enough open land.

The difference in assessed value that’s being argued about is enough to fight over, but not enough to kill the project. In the end, it will be Arlington Heights, simply because there are no alternatives that will give the Bears what they really want…
100 percent. This is about creating an entertainment experience, not a stadium. They want to arrive in the 21st century. They want SoFi. They want AT&T. This is a sports megaplex, casino, family entertainment venue, and, yes, stadium, all in one.

That ain’t happening in Chicago. Lots of backwards-thinking people don’t understand the scope or the game. They still think this is about a 100-yard patch of grass.
 

2MuchChino

Active member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
406
Liked Posts:
280
So, are you thinking that Chicago will throw in Gary, Indiana to sweeten the deal?
I haven't been through Gary in years (now take I57 instead of I65 to get south) but wouldn't say I remember it as a premium location although I think the steel mills are mostly gone so maybe it has been revitalized.
 

Forty-six

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 8, 2020
Posts:
601
Liked Posts:
976
100 percent. This is about creating an entertainment experience, not a stadium. They want to arrive in the 21st century. They want SoFi. They want AT&T. This is a sports megaplex, casino, family entertainment venue, and, yes, stadium, all in one.

That ain’t happening in Chicago. Lots of backwards-thinking people don’t understand the scope or the game. They still think this is about a 100-yard patch of grass.

Any modern NFL franchise would want this. The problem is the Bears are not a modern NFL franchise and they almost, without exception, think small. The AH site can provide so much more of a complete entertainment experience than the lakefront site.

The one thing that gives me hope for the AH site is the complex you describe above will bring in the most $$$, more than what can be built in Chicago. The McCaskey's love their $$$ and so I think they'll make the right move and eventually build in AH.
 
Last edited:

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,407
Liked Posts:
7,605
I haven't been through Gary in years (now take I57 instead of I65 to get south) but wouldn't say I remember it as a premium location although I think the steel mills are mostly gone so maybe it has been revitalized.
It seems I should have used green text.
 

pdxbearsfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 8, 2021
Posts:
5,662
Liked Posts:
2,761
Tactic to soften up the AH city hardliners.

New stadium will be in Arlington Heights. Book it.
I tend to agree. They can recoup the $$'s they spent for the land, but they could build a true destination site in
Arlington Hgts. Lots of money to be mad for all the stuff surrounding the stadium.
 

Top