Bears Scrapping The Arlington Hts Stadium Plan

pdxbearsfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 8, 2021
Posts:
5,662
Liked Posts:
2,761
Idk man. I was reading some AH city council minutes when the initial news broke. People of AH were PISSED off about a singular new apartment complex. I’m thinking a football stadium isn’t going to be welcomed. And seems AH agrees by not offering any tax incentives
The area has a lot of corporate offices including the corporate HQ for Motorola. Many years ago I worked in the area and
directly across the street from our office was the # 1 rated pick-up bar the entire USA, no joke. Not bad.
 

gallagher

Ave Atque Vale
Donator
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
7,941
Liked Posts:
7,036
Location:
Of Semi-Fixed Address
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Ohio Bobcats
I have one requirement and one request.

Requirement: get 75k Chicago-sized asses a seat in stadium. The seating capacity in the current stadium is atrocious.

Request: Replace the parking lots with fan-related services and tailgating, and invest in a bussing system for fans on game days (bus ticket would ideally come with the stadium ticket, with designated service routes).
 

IBleedBearsBlood

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,276
Liked Posts:
5,509
My buddy's cousin's pal's neighbor's friend's uncle who works for the city said he saw on facebook the deal was scrapped because Caleb Williams demanded to play in a dome built under lake michigan.
But what about his barber’s customer??
 

Rise

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,629
Liked Posts:
9,293
Location:
Laughing at Tom Brady
Either Kevin Warren is a master negotiator or a complete idiot. I’m leaning towards complete idiot. Publicly owned stadium? Lmao.

Could have had basically your own Bears city, now we get traffic and a tiny dome, great.
 

Rise

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,629
Liked Posts:
9,293
Location:
Laughing at Tom Brady
Still a negotiation tactic imo.

I hope you’re right. I was looking forward to flying in having a hotel room by the stadium and enjoying a weekend in this new Bears city. I don’t see how this new plan makes any sense.
 

Luke

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 25, 2016
Posts:
1,967
Liked Posts:
1,635
Yeah, why publicly owned, thought the whole purpose was for the Bears to own their own stadium and generate their own revenue

Warren was too inept to find private funding.
Win with dignity!
 

Forty-six

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 8, 2020
Posts:
601
Liked Posts:
976
This is a weird decision from a weird organization. The AH site gives you maximum flexibility and freedom to build whatever stadium you want along with a Bears village. It's literally a blank slate. The lakefront site, while iconic, is much smaller which will severely limit what you can build. The Bears will now need to deal with Chicago politics and environmental groups strongly opposed to building along the lake.

I'm glad the Bears will build a domed stadium. The dome will allow the Bears to build a team that has an offensive identify since winter weather and winds along the lake will no longer be a factor for home games.
 

Bearly

Guest
Publicly owned only means we pay for it. Bears can still get all the revenue and a long term year round peanuts lease. They can sell AH to developers easily enough and have very little outlay for a new facility. All that said, I still think AH is their ultimate destination but between 2 suitors, they are trying to make one blink and may go with what's expedient and has the fastest return.
 

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
19,307
Liked Posts:
17,889
Location:
MICHIGAN
This is a weird decision from a weird organization. The AH site gives you maximum flexibility and freedom to build whatever stadium you want along with a Bears village. It's literally a blank slate. The lakefront site, while iconic, is much smaller which will severely limit what you can build. The Bears will now need to deal with Chicago politics and environmental groups strongly opposed to building along the lake.

I'm glad the Bears will build a domed stadium. The dome will allow the Bears to build a team that has an offensive identify since winter weather and winds along the lake will no longer be a factor for home games.
I heard through sources the dome and lakefront idea was pushed by cw dad. Clear red flags am I right @Noonthirtyjoe ?
 

Xplosive

In the Land of the Blind the One Eyed Fan Is Neggd
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
4,605
Liked Posts:
2,341
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
This is a weird decision from a weird organization. The AH site gives you maximum flexibility and freedom to build whatever stadium you want along with a Bears village. It's literally a blank slate. The lakefront site, while iconic, is much smaller which will severely limit what you can build. The Bears will now need to deal with Chicago politics and environmental groups strongly opposed to building along the lake.

I'm glad the Bears will build a domed stadium. The dome will allow the Bears to build a team that has an offensive identify since winter weather and winds along the lake will no longer be a factor for home games.
Outside of not wanting to pay the property taxes, maybe they reconsidered if Chicago residents or tourists would be drawn to AH outside of football season. Having a Bears Village sounds good until no one shows up except for 8 Sundays a year.
 

Top