- Joined:
- Jul 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 14,948
- Liked Posts:
- 4,297
- Location:
- In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
if it were me, I’d rather not take a running back at #9.
That is interesting. So, let’s play this out.That’s such a silly thing to say. RBs don’t catch passes or run routes 20+ yards down the field regularly. And if they do, they have a LB covering them.
Aren’t you cheeky?!? No.Is who you pass over in favor of an edge rusher.
Taking a DE or OL and leaving Bijan is ignoring Fields. He needs weapons. We can get OL in FA, probably tomorrow.That film is absolutely more like what I want to see to convince me on a RB. Although that spine bending leap was scary for someone who watched Knox's career end. But it's still a luxury pick.
There would have to be some fancy trade down trade up moves made to get him and do what we need. We can't ignore Fields again or we'll be trading the 2 firsts plus some next year to get a QB when we may not have to. Fields it too unproven to give a contract to without seeing it.
Yes. A very good RB that is a better WR than probably every WR in this draft. Yeah. You take him.a rb at 9? do yall hear yourselves.
just put old man velus in the backfield if you want to exploit matchups vs slower lb/s through the air
Glad it’s not. People valuing positions like some in here scout helmets. Please.if it were me, I’d rather not take a running back at #9.
Love your way of thinking outside the box, we have extra picks to pull it off. He would take pressure off Fields if the OL is fixed in FA and would help keep the offense on the field to protect our suspect defense, it's not a one-year rebuild. Add BPA in every round
So you’re assuming Robinson will be a bust if the Bears draft him?
I still would rather not take a running back at #9. Comparing him to Ced Benson, I believe Ced had better stats as a runner as was not that far behind as a receiver out of the backfield. I’ll stand by my statement that I would rather not take any rb at #9 in this draft.Aren’t you cheeky?!? No.
Taking a DE or OL and leaving Bijan is ignoring Fields. He needs weapons. We can get OL in FA, probably tomorrow.
Yes. A very good RB that is a better WR than probably every WR in this draft. Yeah. You take him.
Glad it’s not. People valuing positions like some in here scout helmets. Please.
You can’t put a price on playmakers, especially superstar potential players like Bijan.
Taking a DE or OL and leaving Bijan is ignoring Fields. He needs weapons. We can get OL in FA, probably tomorrow.
I still would rather not take a running back at #9. Comparing him to Ced Benson, I believe Ced had better stats as a runner as was not that far behind as a receiver out of the backfield. I’ll stand by my statement that I would rather not take any rb at #9 in this draft.
My bad, the buccaneers… florida is all the same to me
What i remember about that phase (and RIP Adams) is that lovie thought he could convert dbs at will between corner and safety, never mind defensive end.I'm OK with that. I confused Etienne's team and DJ Moore's team because they're both cats.
What i remember about that phase (and RIP Adams) is that lovie thought he could convert dbs at will between corner and safety, never mind defensive end.
That is to say, everything went to shit once rivera left and lovie appointed babich as his dc puppet
Yep very sad turn of eventsI couldn't remember the name at all. I thought the trade was made and he died before stepping on our field. I was shocked when I found out it was Adams going through off field news around those years. I remember a pretty big impact for only playing 10 games.
Put a CB on him and see how much better a receiver than the WRs in the draft are.That is interesting. So, let’s play this out.
A LB covers Bijan. Who do you think wins that battle?
I have no idea how anyone would scheme for Fields and Bijan at the mesh with D.J. motherfucking Moore on a route.
Value head motherfuckers all be like, I don’t value winning. I don’t value getting a superstar. I’d rather draft. DE from Clemson who doesn’t get sacks or. Hockey dude from Iowa with no bend. Fucking kidding me.
Bijan should easily be the pick at 9.
Qb Fields
RB Bijan
Y Mooney
Z/Slot DJ Moore
TE Kmet
X Claypool
That sounds sexy as fuck. It’s absolutely insane that people think Bijan is just a rb.
I’m looking forward to seeing him do to CBs what CMC does. I fully expect to see Bijan moved around to the Y or X and take a CB one on one and do to his ass the same thing Chilies did to yours last week.Put a CB on him and see how much better a receiver than the WRs in the draft are.
It’s a totally different position with different skills sets. I doubt Robinson is out there setting routes on defenders like a WR does.
Yeah sure he’s the best receiving RB in the draft. But he’s not the best receiver in the entire draft lol
Fair enough. I may not agree with you on this one bit, but at least you’re consistent.I still would rather not take a running back at #9. Comparing him to Ced Benson, I believe Ced had better stats as a runner as was not that far behind as a receiver out of the backfield. I’ll stand by my statement that I would rather not take any rb at #9 in this draft.