Mitchapalooza
Guest
When did i say i wanted to? Just saying VALUE wise its good for a trade up. jesus christ guys.and the one thing the Bears need desperately are draft picks, so let's give them away to move up for what?
When did i say i wanted to? Just saying VALUE wise its good for a trade up. jesus christ guys.and the one thing the Bears need desperately are draft picks, so let's give them away to move up for what?
Doesn't sound like they need to give away all the picks...you are excellent at overreacting to anything relating to Cutler
I wouldn't even have words. It would be an hour before I could even talk. I'd be like one of these dogs whose owners have just back from deployment.
but the bears need more draft picks, not to move up. That's what I'm saying.When did i say i wanted to? Just saying VALUE wise its good for a trade upm jesus christ guys.
why? And why the other teams? How does that benefit the other teams. Come on man. Calling people liar is no class.
Oh, and I don't care if Cutler isn't on the team this year. I don't. I don't want to give up draft picks to get rid of him. let him go and draft. I don't care.
but the bears need more draft picks, not to move up. That's what I'm saying.
even though they say they never did? And the teams interviewed by the media confirm that? wow now you call them all liars eh? What's changed since last month? Where is the value to wait a month to do this? I haven't heard that yet.
I know. I never advocated the trade. I'm saying our 7th, Cutler and our 2nd isn't a bad trade if we were to trade up. I don't want to eitherbut the bears need more draft picks, not to move up. That's what I'm saying.
The only way it wouldn't kick in is if the Bears would have traded him before the league year deadline and then the team that acquired him, immediately cut him. Any team trading for him is not going to cut him after one year.I know that. So now the other team is locked this year and next. wow what a deal on a guy every hater on here claims was paid too much. here take his salary and oh take all of our draft picks so we can suck for another five years.
that's what the story in the link stated. try reading it.
According to the Draft Value Chart used by many teams around the league, the Bears would have to surrender their entire draft and more to move up from the seventh pick to the second pick, though if Cutler were in the trade, that obviously changes the calculation a bit. Either way, this is now something more to watch in the Mariota sweepstakes.
Imagine, the Bears pull the trade, go to 2, take Mariota, who everyone thinks is in Hawaii. But secretly he appears on stage at draft town in Grant Park wearing a Bears jersey with Brian Urlacher, who doesn't think he is a pussy, waving a Cubs flag that is thrown to him as he runs on stage by Nikola Mirotic.
I would take the deal in a heartbeat. Why in holy hell would Tennessee take the deal?
I don't see it, but of course many things have happened that I didn't expect. That is why I'm not promising to eat an actual crow or anything like that.
Emery & Trestman sort of needed to win now, too. Maybe if TN got Pace to pick up Cutler's salary this year it might look like a better deal for them? Idk why any coach would be lobbying to trade for a well-known coach killer.The premise is because Wisenhunt needs to win now or he's fired. He doesn't have time to develop Mariota who isn't even his type of QB, or Mettenberger who's a project with injury concerns. They've got a good defense and maybe Cutler gets them to 9-7 and a WC berth. Wisenhunt uses Cutler for two years and then dumps him with no cap penalty, because Cutler's pay-as-you-go after 2016.
Are we going to bring in Chip Kelly? If not, we can expect to go 3-13 next year.
Are we going to bring in Chip Kelly? If not, we can expect to go 3-13 next year.
You could expect Chip Kelly to go 3-13 if was stuck with Cutler too.
Chip Kelly > Marc Trestman