if the Bears move to Arlington Heights, why exactly would they not be the Chicago Bears anymore? I've said it previously and it's been mentioned in this thread; "New York" has 2 teams that play in New Jersey. they're the New York Football Giants and New York Jets, their team names don't identify with New Jersey. that's not even the difference of which city they play in, it's a complete different state.
on the other side of the coin, the Chargers, Rams, and Raiders all physically moved to entire different metros or states, that's why the locations in their names changed.
people from the suburbs tell the world they live in Chicago. I didn't, because I'm not a product of Chicago proper, I'm from the suburbs. I tell people now with my actual quote fingers I'm from "Chicago" here in Texas because they're not going to know what a Schaumburg is. they also think it's cold there in present day, and unlike Florida, I haven't heard anyone say "ohhh isn't it very windy there?" so alas, people can also tell the world their football team that plays in Arlington Heights is Chicago too then, right?
I don't give a **** what Montucky's view is on this, you can bury him for all I care, I'm just taking the logical approach. if you want to be snarky assholes and overthink this, then whatever. I guess it's the Arlington Heights Bears then because you aren't ever wrong.
the Jacksonville Jaguars aren't coming to Chicago. adding a 2nd team to Chicago isn't going to make the Bears better. I don't know what shit you're all on continuing to push that narrative. the Bears are ingrained in our culture, whoever the 2nd team is will fail just as much as they would in Jacksonville or Los Angeles. and please fucking stop with the adding a team to London talk, it's bad enough they wreck teams schedules with the travel to the other side of the world to try and appeal to a bunch of people that like their football more.