- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,514
- Liked Posts:
- 5,409
- Location:
- Albuquerque, NM
It's a lot easier to let a great RB walk and draft a good one than it is to let a middling qb walk and draft a good one.
I bet a lot of fantasy lineups were just changed. Tony Pollard is back to being a waiver wire pickup
You want to give him 144 million fully guaranteed. You do know that is outright dumb?
Nope. Still have Elliott as my top backup RB, behind Duke Johnson and Saquon Barkley.
I bet a lot of fantasy lineups were just changed. Tony Pollard is back to being a waiver wire pickup
...and took Duke Johnson.
I’m curious what Cohen is going to get for his second contract.
About a cowboys player....On a Bears board. Go figure.
yeah, but they can recover. The real question we will learn this season, is can Minnesota recover after doing what they didn't?And that has really worked out for Washington. They have $22.5M and a 1st round pick invested into the position, and with Case Keenum they are once again staring down another losing season. Seems like a good blueprint for other NFL teams to follow.
yeah, but they can recover. The real question we will learn this season, is can Minnesota recover after doing what they didn't?
Don't like that long of a contract or the guaranteed money, but yeah on a per game basis he isn't worth more than that at this point, unless he improves a lot and shows that he's the type of QB who can win games rather than ride along on a great team. And if he does that, then you pay him like a legit franchise QB. Either way, don't pay elite money for average quality.
Same goes for Dallas. Dak has taken care of the ball better than Trubisky and is less mistake prone, but he isn't a high level guy in terms of production. He hasn't shown that he's good enough to engineer wins on his own back without a top running game and good defense.
Paying any RB that money is stupid. RB’s are easily replaceable, especially with an oline like Dallas. QB’s are not easily replaceable even if they are only average to above average. I would absolutely never pay an RB that money, especially with a decision coming on talented players at positions of importance.easy, don't pay Dak...draft another. Same should be done with Trubisky. Balk at irreplaceable QB money.
Are they actually irreplaceable? If you can't say yes then paying over 20,000,000 will hamstring your team. End of story.
Is somebody else going to pay Dak or Trubisky 30,000,000 on the free agent market to come hold their team back? Somebody has to call a bluff on QB's, like Washington did with one that is better than either of those two.
nah.Jerry should have traded him.
Recover from what? Losing? They are losers. I'd argue the Minnesota Vikings are in contention, which is the entire reason teams play the game. To win.yeah, but they can recover. The real question we will learn this season, is can Minnesota recover after doing what they didn't?
Recover from what? Losing? They are losers. I'd argue the Minnesota Vikings are in contention, which is the entire reason teams play the game. To win.
If given a choice, the Skins or Vikings, I take the Vikings every single time.
First, I am not irate...yet...for the day...I agree with your irate level, but I also don't think it is fair to include the QB travesty to Alex Smith, and subsequent signing of Keenum. The Redskins may have made the right choice but followed it up with 2 bad ones.
The Vikings still have to prove the other side of the coin...that you can win after paying an above average QB over 25 per season.
The problem is that it is very difficult to find a QB, or draft a QB as good as Mitch and Dak. It can be done, but a GM would be putting their job on the line immediately to bet on an unproven QB coming in and maintaining playoff caliber production. If Mitch doesn't improve this season I wouldn't extend him. If he improves and becomes a top 10-15 QB I'd extend him.I'd offer Trubisky 8 years, 18 million per year, fully guaranteed. I'd offer him it now, and I'd keep it on the table for the next 20 months. He is a reasonable QB and deserves security and a reasonable contract. Forget what works for everyone else, thats a contract I would believe in for the player involved and the team. He wants more, then walk and draft another. I
is it really?The problem is that it is very difficult to find a QB, or draft a QB as good as Mitch and Dak. It can be done, but a GM would be putting their job on the line immediately to bet on an unproven QB coming in and maintaining playoff caliber production. If Mitch doesn't improve this season I wouldn't extend him. If he improves and becomes a top 10-15 QB I'd extend him.