<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pmxclland" data-cid="202906" data-time="1372170141">
<div>
Congrats to CC</p>
</p>
Midway in the DET series I wanted to say something....even PM'd Rexy on this...but I wasn't going say/jinx anything about it.</p>
</p>
I think the questions going into the season were legit....his rookie year he shown he can physically be a good goalie, but in year 2 he seemed mentally not to be able to get over/past what would be considered a soft goal. With a team that uses puck possession as a big part of their defense, he'd go 10min without seeing a shot. Year 2 CC had a tough time with that and it seemed when he gave up 1...it weighed on him</p>
</p>
There were several turning points/challenges for him this year, but the one that stood out to me was vs SJ when he gave up 3 in the first - and Q stuck with him. I liked Q's handling of him throughout - seemed to always challenge him/keep him hungry for that number 1 spot - and Sugar Ray was right on his heels. If he slipped....Ray Ray was there to "take his spot". Was a lot of pressure on him....but in my opinion - it molded/prepared him for the playoffs.</p>
</p>
Craw, Waite, I think Ray as well....probably the team shrink did an amazing job this year in preparing Craw for the number 1 role. But it ultimately falls on Craw to produce and he did.</p>
</p>
I don't expect Vezina's out of him....Don't expect him to be the "Olympic goalie". I don't think he goes to another team and becomes some sort of dominant/all world goalie. But the Hawks don't need that. He doesn't need that. He's won a cup and worked hard to get it. Kudos to him..he deserves/earned everything he's gotten - and no one can question if he can "win a cup" ever again.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
Exactly! We needed him to be "Good enough", and he was in spades this year. Hell, I think everyone that we questioned was--not just Crawford.</p>
</p>
Unfortunately we still have malcontents that are on his case as if he buggered them with the business end of a forklift. </p>