- Joined:
- Jan 4, 2011
- Posts:
- 46,213
- Liked Posts:
- 41,013
- Location:
- Chicago
and Captain Kirk
cousins?
and Captain Kirk
and Captain Kirk
Tell that to a Tom Landry or a Bill Belichick .
Nick bringing it. A well earned + rep. He's making lemonade out of lemons in here.
To start, in your post you admit you are basing your statement that you could be an average NFL GM on absolutely nothing. You have no objective proof that you could do it. You just think you can. You continue to hang on to this straw man argument in order to derail the main issue in this thread, which is whether you would make an average GM/Phil Emery. However, even in regard to the straw man argument, you are wrong.
Let's start with the straw man argument:
To put this in context, the arguments you are relying on, as stated by you are:
Let's start with the politician statement. You attempted, quite poorly, to generalize my statement. The point of my statement was that your attempt to hone in on politicians was a terrible example because you failed to identify any single politician, instead you refer to them as a group, and you conclude, with no evidence, that they are elected all the time without any experience whatsoever. Here was your statement:
Again, you refer to these politicians and conclude that there have been officials with no relevant experience. You refer to 3 classes of politicians: mayors, governors, and presidents. You do not point to a single one who has ever met your conclusory standard of having no relevant experience whatsoever. As stated above, my point was to show that your attempt to hone in on politicians was a terrible example because you failed to identify any single politician, instead you refer to them as a group, and you conclude, with no evidence, that they are elected all the time without any experience whatsoever. You don't even seem to recognize the difference between the different positions in politics.
Just for clarity's sake, so we can see the real straw man here, I was arguing that the analogy you used to establish that you would be a good GM was a TERRIBLE analogy. You have since derailed this.
Now on to the GM delegates. This one isn't as obvious, but with a little critical thought we get there. So, lets start with the proposition you are proposing: You, with no experience whatsoever, could become an NFL GM on par with Phil Emery's abilities. How would you hire people?
So, you would hire scouts and coaches by reading the reports. Who is providing you with the reports? ...
And you would make your decisions on head coaches and scouts based on the opinion in the reports. An opinion that isn't your own...
How would you sign players?
So, your scouts are hired by someone else's report. Your head coaches are hired by someone else's report. And who to sign is based upon Cliff Stein's advice.
How are you coming up with your board for actually evaluating players?
Oh, looks like it's other people's opinions. So, let me get this straight, you'll decide who to hire because someone else gives you their advice. You'll decide who to sign based on Cliff Steins advice. And you'll decide what players you'd like to look at based on the input of others. Essentially, you think the only duty of a GM is to make the "final call." I.e. everything is delegated.
Your thought that you can just delegate goes to the heart of the argument that you would be an average GM because it shows that you would not be performing the daily functions required in that job to allow you to be even adequate as a GM. It also points out just how misguided this whole thing is. Which again goes back to the point of whether or not you would be average as a GM.
I'm not sure what the hell this has to do with the point of the thread. I.e. can YOU be as good as Phil Emery. We all know what Phil has done. This is a strawman.
What? Your reason is that you can learn and you have unlimited time. First off, we should be clear, you don't have unlimited time. People die. They have to sleep. They have to eat, etc. Second, a fucking DOG can learn! That is not a qualification. You also have provided us no basis for your opinion that you can learn. We are supposed to take you at your word. But you know what, I'll give you the fact that you can learn. Everyone can and DOES! Hell, Phil Emery learned enough to get his bachelors degree.
Follow this logic if you will: If a scout is good, they are employed. If they are good, they are also desirable. If you are desirable, you can get hired elsewhere.
So, now lets look at your statement:
So, you are going to figure out who the good scouts are, who are also desirable, by reading their reports. But why would a good scout want to work for you if they could work somewhere that didn't require them to teach the GM his position? Why would a scout STAY with you if they were good and desirable and could find employment elsewhere?
I do agree with you in one respect though, you could employ people. However, you would be stuck with the bad people. You would have bad scouts. All the good people would have left your organization or refused to come in. The bad people would then train you poorly because they don't do their job correctly, let alone yours. You would be unable to tell what was good or bad because you have absolutely no experience. This isn't rocket science.
JDB. Late bloomer but is now pushing hard to be the number two behind Rory a Firstimer has lost a step or two the last six months or so.
I'd say FT has rounded out his game in The Bar. He is now showing a diverse array of trolling skills from football to evolution.
I don't see a declaration of victory. I see a summary of mostly terrible posting in this thread.
I'd say FT has rounded out his game in The Bar. He is now showing a diverse array of trolling skills from football to evolution.
Do me Nick!!!!
Wait.....that came out ghey...
Since you mentioned it, I just went to check that out and... holy shit. The stuff that some people are willing to believe will never cease to amaze me.
Since you mentioned it, I just went to check that out and... holy shit. The stuff that some people are willing to believe will never cease to amaze me.
It's really something, but I won't comment on it here as that is a whole nother animal, with different rules and such,
Nick80's scouting reports >>>
Some of those scouting reports genuinely brought me to tears of laughter. God bless you Nick. This place needs more guys like you.