DanTown
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2009
- Posts:
- 2,446
- Liked Posts:
- 509
Here's your problem..... you're assuming I was trying to prove anything. I was just pointing out he was playing better.
I don't see anything in the numbers you posted that suggests anything more than "BABIP luck".
I look at his game log and except for a "HR binge", I don't see it.
http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?player_id=570489#/gamelogs/R/hitting/2016/MINORS
I mean I agree but you're suggesting I should have proved something with regard to Alcantara.
When you say "guy X is playing better" and you use a data set of "before" and "after" as evidence, there has to be a change somewhere. Your use of stats continues to amaze me at how completely baseless it is to any sort of mathematical principle.
I can sit here and say his walk rate is up and his K rate is down from the start of the season if I were attempting to prove something but that really doesn't tell you what is happening.
Sure it's down but two things
1. I can't tell you enough times that there is no difference in either data set (i.e change in stance, swing, etc)
2. While it's down, it's still not good nor something that shows any sort of future MLB ability seeing as he's repeating AAA for the third time and just past 1000 PA in AAA.
It tells you the outcome.
Which is almost meaningless in scouting guys.
Is he seeing the ball better? Is he just not swinging at pitches? The "why" is missing. So when I'm saying they lack the proper metrics, I'm suggesting things like batted ball data, pitch fx and pitch data of what was in the zone and so forth.
These are all great questions that you didn't answer when you said "Alcantra is playing better". I don't understand what you want me to do when you post something I disagree with on a message board.
I did nothing of the sort. I picked a 50 PA sample size narrowed to the nearest game. I chose 50 PAs because it's half what you'd normally accept as the lowest starting point for it being real and not just a hot streak so that it is something you can keep an eye on if you're so inclined. If i wanted to make it the best he could have possibly looked I could have done better.
I don't think any scout uses 50 PA as a representative sample seeing as 50 PA is generally 10-15 games.