- Joined:
- Jun 7, 2011
- Posts:
- 18,077
- Liked Posts:
- 3,472
- Location:
- Chicago
Its pretty sad that the two teams from Chicago actually have to rebuild.
baseball smart? for MLB managers i strongly disagree..those guys are PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS who get paid a great amount because they are some of the best at managing lineups and teams...and have a vast knowledge of the game itself
players is a little bit of a different story....there are some dumb players out there...all MLB players have a higher skill set than your average CCS poster...and i'd argue most have a higher knowledge of the pragmatical aspects of the game when you play and learn from it your whole life...especially playing against the best and learning from essentially professional baseball managers
i mean when you think about it alot of managers are formerly players..because they have tangible experience but also because as professional players they gained alot of knowledge that they could be able to apply as managers
Theo said himself "Every opportunity to win is sacred," Epstein said. "It's sacred to us inside the organization and it should be sacred to the fans as well. They deserve our best efforts to do what we can to improve the club, and put the club in position to succeed in any given season."
Hell, I don't even wanna succeed this season (being realistic), I wanna be entertained and see a watchable product on the field. I don't see a chance of that right now. That's what frustrates me.
This is my exact point. You're right, Captain Obvious. I may not be smarter than Theo. And yeah, maybe I should have a little more faith and his ability to put a winning team on the field. But take a look at teams that've been "rebuilding" for a while -- Oakland, Pittsburgh, Kansas City, etc. Out of those teams, which of them would you say has a shot at winning 85 games? Maybe the Royals? Fans get tired of mediocrity, they get tired of hearing day in and day out, "We're getting closer, this move makes us just a little closer."
That's fine, I can be patient. But I'll once again go back to this point -- Right now, in December 2011, outside of Starlin Castro and Brett Jackson's upside, what do we, as Cubs fans, have to look forward to?
I am being selfish I just want to be able to watch the Cubs this season without expecting a loss every day.
The Cubs are a big market team and those teams do not have to go into full rebuild modes.
I don't see how a guy like Dusty Baker is a better option as manager than let's say Bill James, or a guy that has absolutely no baseball playing experience. I think I see what you're getting at, with that he understands the player mind set, which I agree is important, but I don't think that playing experience has any positive effect on making a line-up or dealing with a bullpen because they become victims of Theriot syndrome(player hustles, he must be good). I just don't see what makes them so special.
What makes you think they learn? And see above.
I see what you are trying to say and I think you want it to be true, but I just don't think it is true. I don't think being a manager takes knowledge at all, to be honest.
right...so any idiot can walk up and be manager? is this serious?
Yeah we just started to do the right thing building-wise last season.. The Last fucking year we could over-spend on the draft.
That's how stupid the Hendry administration was.
We have to completely build.
ya there are managers with no playing experience who may be better than managers WITH playing experience....but i dont think that means either of them dont have knowledge of the game
i think playing experience absolutely helps a manager when you understand the player's perspective and you have experience on the other side...being a manager is not simply about the lineups and the bullpen...there's a little more to it
you act like these guys are expendable....i dont think you quite understand the work and pressure that goes into being an MLB manager(especially with front offices that have itchy trigger fingers if you get what i'm saying)
right...so any idiot can walk up and be manager? is this serious?
lol okI think our definitions of knowledge of the game are different. I'm coming from more of an analytic POV, where as you're talking about how to hit a ball, how to field a grounder, etc. If what I just said is correct, then I can agree with what you're saying, but my feeling is that you have coaches that are there for that. But I see what you're saying, I just disagree with that thought process.
i was exaggerating to show a flaw in your logic....mostly because your statement was pretty blankedThat's not what I'm saying at all. You can't just get a random bum from under the bridge. But I don't think a manager needs to be a former player or have any skill set at all. I think that's more for your coaches.
I think our definitions of knowledge of the game are different. I'm coming from more of an analytic POV, where as you're talking about how to hit a ball, how to field a grounder, etc. If what I just said is correct, then I can agree with what you're saying, but my feeling is that you have coaches that are there for that. But I see what you're saying, I just disagree with that thought process.
That's not what I'm saying at all. You can't just get a random bum from under the bridge. But I don't think a manager needs to be a former player or have any skill set at all. I think that's more for your coaches.
You do not necessarily need your front office/statistics guys to have ever played baseball, but they probably watched a lot of games while poring over spreadsheets and crap. However, you actually want your on-field staff to have some experience in playing the game, even if they were just career minor leaguers or benchwarmers. That garners respect from the players, and the years of playing also allow them to teach mechanics, strategies, and other things that a couch potato could not.