Derrick Rose needs to become a TRUE Point Guard!

bbaker

New member
Joined:
Nov 27, 2011
Posts:
1,776
Liked Posts:
637
Location:
Lolo Jones' Dreams
The PG position is evolving. D-Rose is the new prototype PG. PG's are becoming more slashing/shooting players instead of pass-first players (like a Rondo).

If Rose improved his shot over the off-season, which I would believe he did, he will be considered the best PG in the NBA, no questions asked. I like seeing my PG slashing through the lane & getting to the FT line.

Does he need to pass the ball more? Sure. Did he really have a great supporting cast to pass to last season? Not really. He carried the Bulls on his back all last yr and it finally caught up to them vs. a superior team in the ECF. Let time work. He just turned 23 a few months ago. This season should be fun to watch & see how Rose plays with Rip & a healty Boozer.

Fwiw, I'll take Rose over Rondo every time.
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
So basically you want a worse version of Chris Paul? Let Rose do what he does best.

His statline last year was 25/4/8 which is better than what you posted. If he actually had teammates who could have shot the ball last year he definitely would have had 9/10 assists average.

28/4/9 is probably the best Rose will ever achieve in his career and is what he should aim for.

I hate to break this to you but Derrick Rose sort of is a slightly worse version of Chris Paul when Paul is at his best. When your PG is averaging 28 points and 10 assists, he needs to score or assist nearly EVERY FG.

That is NOT championship basketball. Rose may be capable of 28 and 9 but he would NOT shoot a high percentage and should NOT aim for that. Ideally, Rose has a guy like Rip Hamilton to take pressure off of him. THAT is how he will win a title.
 

bwilde

New member
Joined:
Jul 15, 2011
Posts:
109
Liked Posts:
19
Rose had one bad series while his ankle was injured. He makes passes that people miss. The fact you have videos as examples proves he passes. How many times did rose kick out to bogans for the wide open 3 and he shanks it. Or dishes to boozer and boozer can't even catch it. Do I want rose to get ore assists? Yes I do. Do I blame him for not trusting bogans or Noah to hit an open shot? No cuz I hold my breath when I see the tornado. This thread is Special person. We won 62 games with rose attacking. Again ONE BAD SERIES against a star studded and a team whose defense was just as good as ours. Rose is young he will learn. No one ever comes in and knows it all. Not even jordan.
 

Commodore K'nection

New member
Joined:
May 10, 2011
Posts:
75
Liked Posts:
19
Rose is young he will learn. No one ever comes in and knows it all. Not even jordan.

Apparently you guys can't use logic. The point of this thread back in June 2011 was to encourage Rose to work on his PG skills. Use the summer to learn how to become a better playmaker. Rose comes back to camp and practically admits he tried to do too much last May.

So this last preseason game he goes out and shows off his new playmaking mentality, and you guys say 'nothing has changed, he just got better teammates'.

Rose took 29 shots in his last game of last season. He took only 9 shots tonight. That's 20 fewer FG attempts. I don't care what you guys say, or how you want to twist it. Derrick knew he needed to be a better facilitator, admits as much, and went out tonight with a completely different mentality.


You are never gonna see Derrick shoot the ball 29 times against the Heat ever again. That's all I was trying to accomplish with this thread, and judging by tonight's effort, looks like it was mission accomplished.
 

scottiepippen1994

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 8, 2010
Posts:
9,934
Liked Posts:
2,238
Location:
Chicago Illinois
You are never gonna see Derrick shoot the ball 29 times against the Heat ever again. That's all I was trying to accomplish with this thread, and judging by tonight's effort, looks like it was mission accomplished.

I'm not trying to start anything so don't get me wrong..
But.....I have a problem with the word "never"......
I don't believe Derrick will make it a regular thing to take 29 shots.
But my point is that if we are in a game against Miami and Rip goes down or the team is in a severe offensive slump, I'm sure Derrick Rose would take 29 shots if he had to or felt that was the only chance to help his team win because Rose's mentality will always be to do whatever he has to do to win.....
In most team leaders career, there are going to be nights where the superstar has to completly take over a game to carry his team..that's what makes a great, great...Look at Kobe or Jordans career...and I'm not calling Rose Jordan or Kobe, but Derricks winning mentality is quite similar to the two...Rose will adjust his game according to circumstance..........

The bottom line is never say never.

Go Bulls
 
Last edited:

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
Apparently you guys can't use logic.

You are the one who is irrational. Did you ever even begin to think that the IND defense is a LOT different than the MIA Heat defense in the ECF??

The Bulls had Rip Hamilton and all of their players healthy tonight. Back then it was NOT the case. The Bulls depended on Rose creating off of the dribble and the Heat trapped him and nobody else on the Bulls was even able to create off of the dribble at all. That's why Rose NEEDED to force the action to give the Bulls a chance of winning.

The point of this thread back in June 2011 was to encourage Rose to work on his PG skills. Use the summer to learn how to become a better playmaker. Rose comes back to camp and practically admits he tried to do too much last May.

That is laughable. Rose had plenty of PG skills last season and proved it in countless games. This guy won the MVP for a reason. He was the ONLY player on the Bulls who could consistently get his own shot and create for others. The Heat defense was just too athletic, big, strong, and able to close out on shooters.

So this last preseason game he goes out and shows off his new playmaking mentality, and you guys say 'nothing has changed, he just got better teammates'.

Because that is the truth. Remember the game in MIL where he had 17 assists? There have been PLENTY of games where Rose had double-digit assists last season. You are acting as if Rose is some sort of selfish player. In close games, Rose WAS the offensive game plan last year because he NEEDED to be.

Rose took 29 shots in his last game of last season. He took only 9 shots tonight. That's 20 fewer FG attempts. I don't care what you guys say, or how you want to twist it. Derrick knew he needed to be a better facilitator, admits as much, and went out tonight with a completely different mentality.

COMPLETELY different set of circumstances. Rose has games like this ALL of the time. I watched about 95 Bulls' games last year and it was plain as day that some games Rose is forced to be the facilitator (like last night) while, others, he gets more opportunities to score himself. ESPECIALLY during close games in the last few minutes. You are overreading just one game for the sake of trying to "prove" your misguided, illogical cause.


You are never gonna see Derrick shoot the ball 29 times against the Heat ever again. That's all I was trying to accomplish with this thread, and judging by tonight's effort, looks like it was mission accomplished.

The reason he shot 29 times in that final game against Miami was:

a) It was a close game throughout and he played mega minutes (unlike last night).

b) It was a playoff game against one of the NBA's best defenses (unlike last night).

c) He had Hamilton, and a healthy Boozer who are better offensive options than anything he had in Game 5.

d) Tom Thibodeau WANTED him to play that way instead of passing the ball away resulting in:

- a turnover and a fast break MIA Heat dunk
- a long, contested jumper by one of Rose's teammates which would likely turn into a long MIA rebound and a MIA fast break opportunity.

Please come back when you know what the hell you're talking about.
 

Utahbullsfan

New member
Joined:
May 11, 2011
Posts:
1,468
Liked Posts:
178
You are the one who is irrational. Did you ever even begin to think that the IND defense is a LOT different than the MIA Heat defense in the ECF??

The Bulls had Rip Hamilton and all of their players healthy tonight. Back then it was NOT the case. The Bulls depended on Rose creating off of the dribble and the Heat trapped him and nobody else on the Bulls was even able to create off of the dribble at all. That's why Rose NEEDED to force the action to give the Bulls a chance of winning.



That is laughable. Rose had plenty of PG skills last season and proved it in countless games. This guy won the MVP for a reason. He was the ONLY player on the Bulls who could consistently get his own shot and create for others. The Heat defense was just too athletic, big, strong, and able to close out on shooters.



Because that is the truth. Remember the game in MIL where he had 17 assists? There have been PLENTY of games where Rose had double-digit assists last season. You are acting as if Rose is some sort of selfish player. In close games, Rose WAS the offensive game plan last year because he NEEDED to be.



COMPLETELY different set of circumstances. Rose has games like this ALL of the time. I watched about 95 Bulls' games last year and it was plain as day that some games Rose is forced to be the facilitator (like last night) while, others, he gets more opportunities to score himself. ESPECIALLY during close games in the last few minutes. You are overreading just one game for the sake of trying to "prove" your misguided, illogical cause.




The reason he shot 29 times in that final game against Miami was:

a) It was a close game throughout and he played mega minutes (unlike last night).

b) It was a playoff game against one of the NBA's best defenses (unlike last night).

c) He had Hamilton, and a healthy Boozer who are better offensive options than anything he had in Game 5.

d) Tom Thibodeau WANTED him to play that way instead of passing the ball away resulting in:

- a turnover and a fast break MIA Heat dunk
- a long, contested jumper by one of Rose's teammates which would likely turn into a long MIA rebound and a MIA fast break opportunity.

Please come back when you know what the hell you're talking about.

:clap:
 

Chi-Town Brahma

New member
Joined:
Jun 2, 2010
Posts:
2,376
Liked Posts:
264
Location:
1407 Graymalkin Lane
The PG position is evolving. D-Rose is the new prototype PG. PG's are becoming more slashing/shooting players instead of pass-first players (like a Rondo).

If Rose improved his shot over the off-season, which I would believe he did, he will be considered the best PG in the NBA, no questions asked. I like seeing my PG slashing through the lane & getting to the FT line.

Does he need to pass the ball more? Sure. Did he really have a great supporting cast to pass to last season? Not really. He carried the Bulls on his back all last yr and it finally caught up to them vs. a superior team in the ECF. Let time work. He just turned 23 a few months ago. This season should be fun to watch & see how Rose plays with Rip & a healty Boozer.

Fwiw, I'll take Rose over Rondo every time.

:beerbang:

Rose > Rondo, Paul, Williams, Westbrook, Evans, Kidd, Nash & rest of league.
 

Glide2keva

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 28, 2010
Posts:
3,689
Liked Posts:
754
You are the one who is irrational. Did you ever even begin to think that the IND defense is a LOT different than the MIA Heat defense in the ECF??

The Bulls had Rip Hamilton and all of their players healthy tonight. Back then it was NOT the case. The Bulls depended on Rose creating off of the dribble and the Heat trapped him and nobody else on the Bulls was even able to create off of the dribble at all. That's why Rose NEEDED to force the action to give the Bulls a chance of winning.



That is laughable. Rose had plenty of PG skills last season and proved it in countless games. This guy won the MVP for a reason. He was the ONLY player on the Bulls who could consistently get his own shot and create for others. The Heat defense was just too athletic, big, strong, and able to close out on shooters.



Because that is the truth. Remember the game in MIL where he had 17 assists? There have been PLENTY of games where Rose had double-digit assists last season. You are acting as if Rose is some sort of selfish player. In close games, Rose WAS the offensive game plan last year because he NEEDED to be.



COMPLETELY different set of circumstances. Rose has games like this ALL of the time. I watched about 95 Bulls' games last year and it was plain as day that some games Rose is forced to be the facilitator (like last night) while, others, he gets more opportunities to score himself. ESPECIALLY during close games in the last few minutes. You are overreading just one game for the sake of trying to "prove" your misguided, illogical cause.




The reason he shot 29 times in that final game against Miami was:

a) It was a close game throughout and he played mega minutes (unlike last night).

b) It was a playoff game against one of the NBA's best defenses (unlike last night).

c) He had Hamilton, and a healthy Boozer who are better offensive options than anything he had in Game 5.

d) Tom Thibodeau WANTED him to play that way instead of passing the ball away resulting in:

- a turnover and a fast break MIA Heat dunk
- a long, contested jumper by one of Rose's teammates which would likely turn into a long MIA rebound and a MIA fast break opportunity.

Please come back when you know what the hell you're talking about.
Brings a tear to my eye.

Bravo!!!!!!!!!

:support:
 

Commodore K'nection

New member
Joined:
May 10, 2011
Posts:
75
Liked Posts:
19
Did Derrick Rose play like an MVP in any way this series? He was the WORST player on the floor for our team, I have no problem saying that. When we had CJ Watson on the floor, we actually increased the lead. Watson had a +/- of +4, second best on the team for this game.

When Rose came back in, we couldn't score, turned the ball over and took bad shots. Rose had a -7, easily the worst on the team. It's not a coincidence, but oh, he's the MVP, its ok it's not his fault, his teammates suck.

LeBron completely outplayed our MVP by continually getting his teammates involved. If your suggesting Rose keep playing the way he plays, then good luck to us because we will never get past the Miami Heat.


Quoting myself from last June. Now quoting Derrick Rose from Dec. 24, 2012.


http://espn.go.com/chicago/nba/stor...ulls-derrick-rose-eastern-finals-loss-not-yet

"Walking off at the end, at the (United Center)," Rose said. "Putting everything on me because I thought it was my fault and just working out this whole summer."

Rose has said repeatedly this summer that he feels responsible for the Bulls' meltdown against Miami.

"I put a lot of pressure on myself," he said. "I had the ball 85, 90 percent of the time. I'm one of the leaders on the team, so to me it was my fault."



You're right, Rose played like an MVP. Rose really threw his teammates under the bus, because they obviously couldn't play up to his level against the Heat. #SARCASM
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
Let me make a comparison for you guys. Derrick Rose is kind of like Mike Vick on the court. The PG is often called the quarterback of the offense. The QB's job is to make the proper reads to take advantage of mismatches against a defense. The QB's job is NOT to win the game by himself.

right..the difference is QB usually produces by distributing to other players..while a PG scores and distributes

the QB is definitely what propels the offense...and his job is to lead the offense..its hard for a team to win without a good QB..especially with the way the NFL has evolved to become a high powered-shot gun league

basically in the NFL you have two options..run or pass...you have options and intricate trick plays..but thats the basics...ya you pass to different WRs but thats basically your options

in the NBA you have five options..basically all the players on the floors...they can do different thing but thats what you're looking at


Like Vick, Derrick Rose is an elite athlete for his position. Mike Vick was a running QB, like Rose is a scoring PG. Vick was pretty easy to defend when he was one-dimensional. Vick made breath-taking runs, but if you sellout to stopping him instead of the other play-makers on offense, you win. Same goes with D-Rose when he's looking for his shot first. Stop Derrick and chances of you winning go up. But, if Derrick becomes a pure passing PG, like Vick has become a true passing QB, he becomes very difficult to defend. Now instead of selling out to stop one player, the opponent has to commit to defend the entire team.

i would argue the scoring aspect of PGs in the league today is more important and more evident than the running aspect for QBs...you have vick, newton,but really most QBs are pass first pocket..brees and brady are really pocket...rodgers runs but he does it conventionally and doesnt do it enough to be called truly multi dimensional

in the NBA...its hard to be a good PG and not score...otherwise you ironically take away from the offense...especially in the league today

think about rose,westbrook,parker,evans,paul,etc.

those guys are avid facilitators but they are also scorers..hell nash one of the most pass first PGs in the league...is one of the most efficient scorers in the league...also a threat from 3 point range....in his best years he averaged around 15 PPG

i like the comparison...and i do agree rose needs to facilitate more(he may have been the MVP..but i dont think he was the best pure-positional PG if you catch my drift) but i disagree with the notion he needs to be pass first...unlike vick...rose's calling card is scoring over passing....because of how the NFL works vick has become a dual threat..but i'd argue he's more of a passer now than a runner..and that's how most dual threat QBs are

why completely change rose's game when he's clearly comfortable as a scoring first...again i think he does need to be able to improve his vision and reading defenses and i think thats the next step..but completely changing his offensive philosophy would hurt more than help imo


Defenses already know Derrick is a ridiculous threat to score. Now they need to know he’s a dangerous threat to pass too. Instead of being a one-dimensional player, if Rose can be a multi-dimensional player it keeps the defense on it's heels. Defenders won’t know if Rose will try to score, or make a creative pass to set up a teammate.

rose averaged 7.7 assists per game...its not like he cant pass or he isnt a threat to pass...nor do i think this was the main problem in their series vs. miami

Against the Eagles now, defenses have to guard DeSean Jackson, Jeremy Maclin, LeSean McCoy, Brent Celek as well as contain Vick’s running. Vick has proven he can find them all. Vick is no longer a one-man show, and consequently he's never played better. If Rose can become a complete player like Vick, learning to find his teammates in favorable positions and mismatches, our offense will be much more versatile.

look..i agree with the idea...but you have to remember part of the reason rose was the "one man show" in some situations was because NO ONE ELSE COULD PRODUCE...facilitating only goes so far to make players better...noah is limited offensively..boozer was injured..deng cant dribble that well...the bulls had no 3 point shooting which means the offense was predictable

hmmm....now maybe its my opinion but those seem to be bigger issues than rose's mentality, no?

dont take this as me completely disagreeing...again i agree with the idea

Whether we win a championship depends on D-Rose playing like a true PG. Not to say that Rose shouldn't score. Vick hasn't turned into Peyton Manning. He still takes off for his patented 40-yd runs, but he runs only when his play-makers are accounted for. It makes the runs more effective. Rose should still attack the basket, he's too talented not too, but don't force it. Attack when defenses are giving you the lane, if they are packing the paint find the mismatch and give your teammate the ball.

again, like the idea..but rose is the best at getting to the basket..it shouldnt be "oh only drive when its conventional"...because thats what rose does best and thats his strength...he's also been developing his outside game which adds another facet for defenses to cover(another difference in the parallel between PGs scoring in the NBA and QBs running in the NFL...scoring in the NBA is much more diverse and harder to predict than QB scrambling)

i advocate that rose continue to drive and create, but look more to make the defenses bite and collapse in the paint..and then dish it to the open man..basically continue to attack..but look more for a man to be open rather than take it for a foul/layup or whatever he is going to do....

do not misconstrue this for any radical change..but thats just my opinion


Bottom line, instead of playing like a shorter, smaller Kobe Bryant, we need him to play like a bigger, faster, stronger Steve Nash. That’s it, point blank.

Good luck this summer D-Rose. Work on your game, we can't wait to see what you come back with in the fall.

why can't he be a kobe/nash hybrid? why does it have to be one extreme...the PG position has evolved...

also i agree with crys...i think its funny that we're centering on the MVP of not only the team but the league for the sources of the bulls issues when really(as i sparsely listed earlier in this response) its really alot of the other components of the team

not to say rose cant improve though, facilitating wise
 
Last edited:

Crystallas

Three if by air
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
20,014
Liked Posts:
9,558
Location:
Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
Wait... so you compare Rose to Vick. Why aren't you worried about Vick being more of a Brady then? I'm not trying to hate on your opinion, as you are right to it, but a zebra can't change it's stripes and just implant the Matrix code of Steve Nash and John Stockton into DRose's head. This isn't a video game where you can reprogram habits or move sliders. You have a style, you build around it.

Jordan was a scoring leader, he wasn't supposed to win championships. Do you think we watched basketball for the ooh's and ahh's? No, we witnessed the mold being broken, not only from a players standpoint, but from the standpoint of how teams now build winners.

Now, we break that mold again.
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
Quoting myself from last June. Now quoting Derrick Rose from Dec. 24, 2012.


Chicago Bulls' Derrick Rose on Eastern finals loss -- I'm not over it yet - ESPN Chicago

"Walking off at the end, at the (United Center)," Rose said. "Putting everything on me because I thought it was my fault and just working out this whole summer."

Rose has said repeatedly this summer that he feels responsible for the Bulls' meltdown against Miami.

"I put a lot of pressure on myself," he said. "I had the ball 85, 90 percent of the time. I'm one of the leaders on the team, so to me it was my fault."



You're right, Rose played like an MVP. Rose really threw his teammates under the bus, because they obviously couldn't play up to his level against the Heat. #SARCASM

"I put a lot of pressure on myself. I had the ball 85, 90 percent of the time. I'm one of the leaders on the team, so to me it was my fault."

He did not say that the mistake he made was the fact that he had the ball 85-90% of the time because he had no choice about that. He is taking responsibility for missing shots that he feels he should have made as the leader of the team.

And, no, Rose's teammates can NOT play up to his level. What are you watching?
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
Isiah Thomas had the same mentality that Rose had as a PG. So did Magic Johnson. The difference is that Rose is a better scorer than those guys. Sure, he is not as good of a passer, but he shouldn't be passing as much as them anyway because his teammates are nowhere near as good as Magic's or Thomas'.
 

houheffna

Ignoring Idiots
Joined:
May 6, 2009
Posts:
8,673
Liked Posts:
2,711
I think some are forgetting that Rose was forced into what he does not just by a lack of talent but by the front office. They wanted him to take the initiative offensively for the team. He was a point guard first, but his capabilities suggested that there are other things he can do well, like score.

And I don't think Rose and Magic have the same mentality necessarily. Isiah was brash and considered arrogant, but he could back it up. Rose is Rose, there has not been a player like him, let things unfold and lets quit trying to suggest he is like this player or that player....he is one of a kind.
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
I think some are forgetting that Rose was forced into what he does not just by a lack of talent but by the front office. They wanted him to take the initiative offensively for the team. He was a point guard first, but his capabilities suggested that there are other things he can do well, like score.

And I don't think Rose and Magic have the same mentality necessarily. Isiah was brash and considered arrogant, but he could back it up. Rose is Rose, there has not been a player like him, let things unfold and lets quit trying to suggest he is like this player or that player....he is one of a kind.

Emotions aside, Rose, Thomas, and Magic all played within their team's offense and took what the opposing defense gave them. That's what I mean when I say that they had the same mentality. They just had different players as teammates and different abilities.
 

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
The original poster makes some observations that are hard to consider invalid. But what's being obscured here is that teams with great players typically win NBA championships. This implies that it's more than just a PG. Another flaw with this is that, the suggestion that Rose needs to be more like Steve Nash (who has never even been to the finals), seems to suggest this kind of a PG is necessary to win.

If any fan should know this to be untrue, it should be Bulls fans. We witnessed the greatest dynasty in modern sports take place. During this dynasty, the need for a traditional PG was dramatically diminished.

If our own Bulls teams from the 90s did it without relying on a traditional PG, then who is to say that it can't also be done while heavily relying on the PG? Before the Bulls started winning titles, were people questioning whether or not you could win a championship with your SF handling the ball so much? He makes valid points about the limitations that come with playing PG but this goes back to the fact that great teams typically have other great players.

There are often size considerations but then there's also the fact that 2-5 can be positioned in a way where he can be fed the ball more easily than can be done with a PG.

I'm reluctant to say things like this because it seems like I'm questioning how Thibs does things and I respect him and readily admit that he knows more than I do. Nevertheless, we all have our own thoughts and biases and one thing I would kind of like to have see is the offense run more with Derrick and CJ. CJ is kind of a lesser version of Rose. Since Derrick is not the traditional PG, it makes sense to put other players out there that blur the traditional roles to compliment him. This is why I wouldn't have minded seeing someone like Billups. I know people don't like dual PGs because of problems that are encountred when guarding guys like D Wade but the Thibs defense is one that's better than the sum of its parts. Part of that is zone.

I expect it to be a bigger challenge this season. For one, the Bulls are a targeted team. Other teams see the Bulls as a benchmark to guage where they're at. So, other teams will often be more up for the Bulls. Secondly, the division is better now...at least it would seem so. We almost swept the division last year. I doubt that happens this year. Indiana looks like it will be a tough team. Milwaukee could always turn the corner too. But it's what happens in the playoffs thats the bigger focus this year. It's not that last year meant nothing as the Bulls were an up and coming team. It was validation for them and their new coach. But now the focus has to move to the post season. As a team that had been .500 in previous years and hadn't won a post season series, the odds were against the Bulls winning the championship in that way. But now that they've been to the conf finals, it's time to look to taking the next step and the number of wins during the regular season, to an extent, is merely incidental.
 

Top