- Joined:
- Apr 11, 2009
- Posts:
- 23,779
- Liked Posts:
- 7,450
My favorite teams
I'm cool with you saying that Rose doesn't have this "IT" thing as discussed in the article. There have been others who have disagreed with me and I'm fine with that. The only issue I have with your claim is that it's based only upon your definition of "IT" and not what was presented in context. The question was basically, does Rose have the killer instinct to close out a game? Or perhaps better stated, "is Rose clutch?" You can say no, and I will say you're wrong and present my argument, and perhaps in my own stubbornness that might seem like it's my way or the highway. If so, I apologize.I did no such thing. A question was posed and I answered it against the popular belief of the respondents. If the question had no other answer why was it even asked or answered by anyone? Sorry, the only ones saying it's my way or the highway seems (and notice I said seems) to be you and others
Nevertheless, here's what I saw from my perspective
OP-"Does Rose have the killer instinct to close out games?" (in the context of "IT" being defined as “It” is the will-to-win and, most importantly, that killer instinct.)
Your response-"No because players with "IT" don't sit out"
Me-"I thought he was referring to having the killer instinct to close out games"
You-"Players with killer instincts play"
In my mind you basically ignored the original definition and replaced it with your own. Now if your answer to the original definition is still no, then that's that.