It went in one ear & out the other. .
Thank you for confirming the fact that it didn't run into anything during this journey through your head. I will keep this in mine when reading all of your future posts.
Wanted to be paid like a star and a starter. He wasn't and still isn't.
Had a somewhat decent first season then fell off a cliff. Was a shell of himself while here and a complete ass clown behind closed doors. Why should we have been loyal to him?
Tyrus got more than enough chances here to succeed. Why should we have been loyal to him? Taj was better last year than Tyrus ever was.
Started off really badly the year after the playoffs and is a blackhole with the basketball. His trading helped free up cap space to go afetr FA's this past season. Seems like a good idea seeing where we currently are, no?
Kirk always got a bad rap here but he was a valuable asset and his trade helped free up cap space. Sucked to see him go but for the long term may have been a needed move.
Nice work. The Bulls should have been loyal to Salmons....yet they traded Noc for Salmons. How is this even possible? Noc was a guy but it was domino that had to fall to free up cap space.
It is pretty apparent that if they think a player isn't working, or cap space is needed.
Seems like a pretty sound business practice....
Have you not heard about how much Jordan hated Krause? Or how Krause could have kept the championship team together, but opted to completely destroy it instead. Leaving us with 14 years of darkness?
Jordan was done in 1998 everyone knew that. Hell, the last few games of the season and his last MSG game was a glorified farewell tour. I don't think anyone truly though the Bulls would be back together after the second three peat...especially with the lockout looming.
Do you not remember how Bulls management disrespected Horace to the point that he left town?
Jordan hated Horace too. Horace had the attitude of a star when he wasn't.
The Heat weren't going anywhere. Riley had to make big moves to please his star player.
Maybe the Bulls were makign these moves to help please Rose and prove to him they were building a winner?
Hmm...
Something the Bulls didn't need to do at the time. In fact at the time, the Bulls let there star player go in Ben Gordon.
Ben Gordon wasn't a star. The moment Rose ws drafted he became the biggest and best thing on that team. Plus not handing out a bigger contract to Gordon helped the Bulls conserve cap space for this most recent class. Again, another sound business decision.
I am sorry, what exactly did Beasley do in Miami? Absolute squat.
Not the point.
He won 6th man, & he was a contributing factor to almost outing the Boston Celtics.
Yawn. Who cares? He wanted to get paid big money, that he wasn't worth, the Bulls let him walk and invested the money more wisely in other areas. Gordon had some nice years here. Yeah, we know, but that doesn't mean he's entitled to be a Bull for life or get what he wants. The Bulls are trying to win a championship. If they feel moving Gordon or allowing him to go so they can spend the money elsewhere more effectivley gets them to that point or closer to that overall goal they are well within their rights too....and were/are smart in doing so.
Some people are still pissed Pax let him go.
Who?
You and the other 2 members of the Ben Gordon fan club?
I thought he hurt them more than helped.
Then why should the Bulls have been "loyal" to him and given him a large contract? Why is it a bad thing or "disloyalty" to let him walk?
You keep mentioning all these players the Bulls should have shown loyalty to, yet keep saying they are bad, or hurt the team etc. Why/how should the Bulls have shown loyalty to these players? Explain that or STFU.