Does Rose hate Dwyane Wade?

[Rush]

Im not picking sides or dropping my opinion anywhere but just putting somebody on ignore is boring unless they follow you around calling you Insult A/Insult B.

Differing opinions make this place interesting. Don't get butthurt because somebody challenges you, you are proved wrong, etc. It's the joy of talking sports. We could all be getting hacked up by cartels in other nations, so just calm down. It's not that big of a deal lol

 

[Anytime23]

Im not picking sides or dropping my opinion anywhere but just putting somebody on ignore is boring unless they follow you around calling you Insult A/Insult B.

Differing opinions make this place interesting. Don't get butthurt because somebody challenges you, you are proved wrong, etc. It's the joy of talking sports. We could all be getting hacked up by cartels in other nations, so just calm down. It's not that big of a deal lol

Oh man, here you go again....No ones butt hurt. i just dont see the point in reading posts by someone who is clearly a fucking moron. Theres opinions and then theirs people who are just plain dumb. His opinions are flawed to the point where its a joke. Everyone should ignore him and discuss the topics with posters who actually have something of quality to add.

Ive argued with almost every single poster in here, they obviously arent all on ignore.

 

[TopekaRoy]

Im not picking sides or dropping my opinion anywhere but just putting somebody on ignore is boring unless they follow you around calling you Insult A/Insult B.

I agree. I would never put anyone on ignore.

Some posts are good for their insight and keen analyses. Some are just good for a laugh!

 

[Rush]

Oh man, here you go again....No ones butt hurt. i just dont see the point in reading posts by someone who is clearly a fucking moron. Theres opinions and then theirs people who are just plain dumb. His opinions are flawed to the point where its a joke. Everyone should ignore him and discuss the topics with posters who actually have something of quality to add.

Ive argued with almost every single poster in here, they obviously arent all on ignore.

Somebody is clearly butthurt because I got a PM asking about the rules of this place because they were "about to go the **** off".

 

[Anytime23]

Somebody is clearly butthurt because I got a PM asking about the rules of this place because they were "about to go the **** off".

When i said "No ones butt hurt" i was talking about myself because your post looked geared towards me.

Who sent that PM? Put him on blast.

 

[Rush]

All I saw in this thread from you was about putting him on ignore.

When people are spewing crap, the last thing I want to do is ignore it...I want to laugh at it.

 

[Anytime23]

A lot of people spew crap. But when i hear D-Wades comments about the Bulls loyalty are right because of Gordon, Salmons, Thomas and Nocioni, i have to think someone is a complete and utter moron. From everything else ive seen from him, he doesnt have a clue about the NBA and has probably been a Bulls fan since the Bulls-Celtics series two years ago.

Ignoring him was just my recommendation.

 

[Rush]

If anything it's not a wildly ridiculous claim, but it's just the wrong reasoning to prove it right. I know they are doing better by bringing Pippen back into the org.

Could be off base, is that right or wrong?

 

[Anytime23]

Its just completely wrong. All of the examples used had nothing to do with Wade's claims. According to Bulls on Parade, the Bulls should pay every player they have whatever they want and never trade anyone to try and improve their team. The Bulls did what every other single team in the NBA has done and theyre 3 games from the finals because of it.

Wade used Jordan as an example, fine i can understand that. But Kirk Hinrich?

 

[FirstTimer]

Every single bit of this can be bragged about with the help of hindsight.

Really? Odd. Most people knew Tryus wasn't that good when we had him. We knew Gordon wasn't worth the money when he was up for a contract. Everyone knew the end game by mid way through 2009 acquiring the contracts we were. It wasn't "hindsight" the orgnaization obviously had a long term goal(2010 free agency). it's not as though they fell as first into these choices and woke up July 1st 2010 and said "Holy shit! Thanks God we didn't sign Gordon!? Did you know Lebron was going to be a free agent? Lucky us!"

Most every move the Bulls made from mid 2009 and on was positioning them for this free agency class.

Way to clip my posts to suit your means. Did you not notice that I mentioned I personally did not care for Gordon?

Then why and how should the Bulls have been "loyal" to him?

But make not mistake, Gordon was still considered the star on that team at the time.

By who?

I also mentioned that the lack of Loyalty was the reason we are where we are, so loyalty has its faults.

Of Course Wallace fell off. Everybody knows that now. What the **** is your point?

Really? I stated my point. Why should we have been loyal to him?

You have yet to answer anything in here. What would we/should we have done to "show loyalty" to these players?

But please by all means keep Fox Newsing my posts.

And keep avoiding anyone else's points and questions...

 

[Rush]

We won't be seeing anymore of him. He PMed me saying he was leaving lol.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNQRfBAzSzo]YouTube - ‪Queen - Another One Bites The Dust‬‏[/ame]

 

[FirstTimer]

Good.

 

[Glide2keva]

I ignored him because he was proven wrong and tried to change the context of the argument because he lost his original point.

I owned his ass on that "making shit up claim" in all of 2 seconds, and he never acknowledged it. That's classic troll action.

I don't waste time with trolls.