Every Fields sack against Green Bay, for the “geniuses” that are saying that he “held onto the ball to long”

ursamajor

ursamajor

D.J. Moore is phat
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,176
Liked Posts:
3,993
Location:
HHM’s Head
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
BaBaBlacksheep said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744172960515039609
Click to expand...
He completed nearly 70% of his passes, and over 9 yards per attempt.

I read that and see that if you keep Fields in the “pocket” you have a good chance to win, because as we saw today, by and large, there was no pocket. On the few times there was, the ball came out quick, clean, accurate, and on time. Shit, If the interior of the line could’ve held up, I absolutely believe that the Bears would’ve won this game.

It was SO bad.
 
ursamajor

ursamajor

D.J. Moore is phat
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,176
Liked Posts:
3,993
Location:
HHM’s Head
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Bort said:
So many idiots on this message board are so accustomed to bad quarterback play that they zealously defend mediocrity.

Look at these plays.

At 0:39, the corners bail, the linebacker blitzes, and as a result, Kmet is totally uncovered on the out route, just wide the **** open, and Fields doesn't see it. Yeah, Braxton Jones gets bullrushed right into Fields' lap, but if Fields was a good quarterback, he would have recognized the blitz and coverage, and the ball would be out right here.

View attachment 33668

At 2:50, it's a 3 step drop and they're sending six pass rushers. The ball has to come out. I don't have the All-22 so I don't know who is or isn't open downfield, but no offensive line in the NFL is going to hold up very long when they send 6, and it's a 3 step drop so this is a play specifically designed to get rid of the ball quickly, but Fields holds it and eats the sack.
View attachment 33669

At 4:53, the pocket collapses very quickly with only a 4 man rush, which, yes, is bad OL play, and it looks like Fields' first read was Kmet on the dig route, which the safety was going to jump and probably get an interception if Fields threw it, so eating the sack was better than trying to force the ball to Kmet. Nonetheless, DJ Moore was coming wide open for a touchdown on the post route, and a better quarterback would have anticipated it and thrown an easy TD pass to Moore.
View attachment 33671

At 7:45, they're sending 5 pass rushers against a 5 man protection, which is going to result in pressure almost 100% of the time at the NFL level. The ball has to come out to Roschon Johnson. Fields has to recognize the blitz and get rid of the ball. I don't know if Roschon picks up the first down, but FIelds needs to get rid of the ball and give him a chance.
View attachment 33673

At 10:35, I agree that sack is 100% on Tevin Jenkins, and there's nothing Fields could have done.

I think a legitimate NFL franchise quarterback would have taken the sack at 10:35 and probably one (maybe 2) of the other 4 because no one is perfect, but taking all 5 sacks in these situations is just unacceptable mediocre QB play.
Click to expand...
Two of the throws you criticize Fields for not taking, wouldn’t have converted the 3rd down. Another one, the First one, was at a VERY low that he had to scoop from his lace's, taking his eyes down. The corners bail, but his eyes are not only down, but he had to completely bend over. His eyes were late, because the snap was ridiculously bad. And he tried to step up, to buy time to recover and see what the defense was doing post snap.

Ridiculous.
 
ursamajor

ursamajor

D.J. Moore is phat
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,176
Liked Posts:
3,993
Location:
HHM’s Head
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Midwaymonster75 said:
This is the part thats on coaching. Ive been seeing guy s look lost all season blocking nobody. Bumping into each other going the wrong way. Thats coaching.
Click to expand...
I thought that was Fields 🤷🏽‍♂️
 

jbunch14

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 28, 2016
Posts:
1,996
Liked Posts:
1,622
Will be interesting to see the all-22 cutups. In game they were showing the all-22 on the first 3 sacks or so, and everyone was blanketed. When GB was playing man and sending an extra rusher the Bears had no answer. Don't know if it was Fields or Getsy that couldn't figure it out, but it was ugly on both sides of the ball.
 

discplayer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 30, 2012
Posts:
1,515
Liked Posts:
880
Location:
Atlanta
mbison said:
Same old excuses and this is 3 years later. It has already been proven over his career that he holds the ball longer than any other QB in the league.

Why can’t you just accept that he’s not very good? It’s been 3 years of this

Jordan love has less talent around him, had played only 1 year and he lit up the Bears and made Fields QB play look amateur

FYI. Fields and Love play out of the same system too.
Click to expand...
You can NOT be comparing what Getsy is calling (complete shite, BTW) to what La Fleur does. It may be from “the same tree,” but whereas La Fleur‘s system is like an Oak, creative and majestic, Getsy’s is more of an invasive shrub.
 
mecha

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,365
Liked Posts:
9,763
discplayer said:
You can NOT be comparing what Getsy is calling (complete shite, BTW) to what La Fleur does. It may be from “the same tree,” but whereas La Fleur‘s system is like an Oak, creative and majestic, Getsy’s is more of an invasive shrub.
Click to expand...
Getsy was the quarterbacks coach for Aaron Rodgers. doesn't sound like you have to be a complex mental giant to do that job.
 
Toast88

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,723
Liked Posts:
14,944
BaBaBlacksheep said:
Are good QBs allowed to avoid the rush sometimes? Even if the OL is playing like obvious dog shit is it OK for a good QB to sometimes make a play? Or are we only supposed to consider the plays that are perfectly blocked?
Click to expand...
If you listen to Corey Wootten, there’s nothing Fields could’ve done differently in this game. He played a perfect game.
 
DrGonzo

DrGonzo

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,680
Liked Posts:
5,502
Location:
Albuquerque, NM
ursamajor

ursamajor

D.J. Moore is phat
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,176
Liked Posts:
3,993
Location:
HHM’s Head
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
BaBaBlacksheep said:
Look I’m not absolving the OL or Getsy or the WR’s or anyone else on the team.

What I refuse to do is give Fields a free pass like a large portion of this fan base does. You want to criticize…. Criticize ALL of it. Poles too.
Click to expand...
Poles couldn’t even put together his own list of candidates together, let alone pick his own HC.

I feel badly for Poles. It seems like he is the only one that actually is TRYING to build a winner. But he will ultimately be handcuffed by George, and he will ultimately become the sacrificial lamb.
 
Myk

Myk

85in25
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
12,680
Liked Posts:
5,263
mbison said:
Same old excuses and this is 3 years later. It has already been proven over his career that he holds the ball longer than any other QB in the league.

Why can’t you just accept that he’s not very good? It’s been 3 years of this

Jordan love has less talent around him, had played only 1 year and he lit up the Bears and made Fields QB play look amateur

FYI. Fields and Love play out of the same system too.
Click to expand...

I've also proven that nobody in the NFL runs faster than 10yds per second. Longer when you consider the stuff.
Is math really that hard for you?

The way you who hate all Bears QBs are there's "wahhh, he holds the ball too long" or "waaahhhh, he's a noodle arm". If you had a PFF 2.5 second throwing QB on the Bears you'd still be crying about it. It's mathematically impossible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

10,941members
96,097threads
4,558,677posts
636online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 636 (members: 40, guests: 596)
Top