Everything MLB: News, Highlights, And Just Plain Chit Chat

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
The Marlins are the dumbest organization in all of professional sports.
 

2SeamHeat

I Know Nuffing!!!!!
Joined:
Aug 15, 2011
Posts:
897
Liked Posts:
188
Location:
West Texas
The Marlins are the dumbest organization in all of professional sports.

While they made some really bad FA/trade moves this winter, and all in vain as they still didn't have the stuff to compete in what might be the second toughest division in baseball right now... I don't think this is such a bad trade. I think they got ripped off on the Ramirez trade, but Eovaldi should be a pretty good SP in the future. They also did pretty well with the Anibal Sanchez trade.
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal
Source: #Reds get Broxton.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Marlins 2 WS in last 20 yrs. How many Cubs have? 0 so dont be that guy

Took Cubs one year to win highest baseball championship at time of founding (won 1870 National Association of Base Ball Players pennant in first season of existence), took the Marlins five season to win World Series :dealwithit:

:troll:
 

2SeamHeat

I Know Nuffing!!!!!
Joined:
Aug 15, 2011
Posts:
897
Liked Posts:
188
Location:
West Texas
Took Cubs one year to win highest baseball championship at time of founding (won 1870 National Association of Base Ball Players pennant in first season of existence), took the Marlins five season to win World Series :dealwithit:

:troll:

Not such an out of reach thing, since the Cubs (White Stockings at the time) existed prior to that particular association's founding... and there were only 9 teams in the league. The Cubs even left the league for 2 years due to the Great Fire of 1871, returning in 1874. Oh, and in 1871, ALL of the teams were new to the league, as it was a new league. Several teams from the old leagues lost many of their players, as they did not want to transfer to the new league and it's different rules. The White Stockings were the only team to transfer from one league to the other in 1871 and not lose any of their players.

The Cubs began playing as a semi-professional unit in 1870, but have roots as far back as 1866 as an amateur squad. Most of the guys that were around in 1868 as amateurs were on the club that won the NAPBBP pennant in 1871 (hence why they were considered a semi-pro team, they still had more amateurs than pros). They weren't considered a full-time professional team until 1876 when the National League started up. At that time, the White Stockings went out and signed the premiere players from the defunct NAPBBP and NABBP (two different leagues, as the NAPBBP formed due to a split with the NABBP over rules and regulations disagreements) to become the dominant team in the new league.

So, it's not quite the same kind of story to claim the Cubs won a pennant after just 1 year of existence... and stating that the Marlins took 5 years (against 27 and 29 established teams... not 8 unestablished teams). Also, the Marlins have actually won the WS twice in the past 20 years, the Cubs have not. They even beat the Cubs on their way to one of those WS victories. Considering that the Cubs dramatically shift gears after Spalding sold the club to Wrigley... and even more shifting when Wrigley sold the club to the Tribune.... you can say that the Cubs are not the same organization they were in the 1870s. Over the past 20 years, the Marlins have been overall a better organization simply due to the 2 WS wins compared to the Cubs' 104-year drought.
 
Last edited:

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
There's actually a good Joe Posnanski blog about why the Cubs have sucked for so long. It mentions some of the fails of ownership in addition to all the random bad luck.
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
There's actually a good Joe Posnanski blog about why the Cubs have sucked for so long. It mentions some of the fails of ownership in addition to all the random bad luck.

I saw that. He makes some really good points and is correct IMO.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Yes and it touches on a lot of things including the fact that 1908 isn't really the whole story with the Cubs (winning a number of pennants in between 08-45). The problem was being behind everyone else for long stretches of time (whether that was a farm system in the 40s and 50s), not spending money (70s-80s), relying only on traditional baseball analysis (90s-00s). Some bad luck in not converting the rare chances between 45 and now is the "curse", but mostly this has been a poorly run franchise for a majority of its 125+ year history.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
kind of a slow day for trades. the usual suspects went as predicted but now a lot of surprises.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Yeah none of the arms with control went anywhere, and I am surprised that Millwood and Vargas are still in Seattle.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Neftali Feliz will have Tommy John reconstructive elbow surgery on Wednesday in Arlington, Texas.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
And as I said in the Dempster thread I think this is why the Cubs got what they got for Dempster from Texas. Without it happening the Cubs were going to keep him.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
And as I said in the Dempster thread I think this is why the Cubs got what they got for Dempster from Texas. Without it happening the Cubs were going to keep him.

at the end of the day its better than a comp pick and or the chance that demp takes the 12.3

so glad the deadline is over. time for baseball!

are any of the specs coming up right away? is randy wells coming back up?
 

Top