- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 45,382
- Liked Posts:
- 54,947
Not that I need to remind the normal people who visit here, but there’s a lot of really dumb, brain dead posters on this forum.
Brane dead
Not that I need to remind the normal people who visit here, but there’s a lot of really dumb, brain dead posters on this forum.
The Galloping Ghost said:
I mean he literally did not do that.
Considering they got 4 turnovers off the Lions this game should not have been close. But Justin Fields is a model of inefficiency. His running is great. U til he consistently produces from the pocket the Bears will never be a consistent offense. Especially when it matters most.
"If the Bears defense had held the Lions out of the end zone and won the game, I would feel exactly the same way about Fields. He's not good.enough."
-The Galloping Ghost
Gotcha.....you do not like JF no matter what he does as the Bears Qb.
At own 25, and against a really good defense. Wright whiffed on his block, and would've been a sack anyways. Hutch met Fields there at his drop. So 2nd and long about 24 seconds at own 15. Get a FG to tie the game, not win it. Bears are most likely losing this game anyways with pussy Eberflus calling the defense anyways.Fields did have 30 seconds and two TO to get into FG range. When will fields ever be clutch? He had a chance and fumbled. Name one time in fields 30 games he was clutch and won a game? You aren’t being honest with yourself
I find it somewhat humorous that no one is mentioning the almost 9 minute drive in the 4th quarter that would've sealed it for any properly coached team.You're leaving out the part where the offense had the ball in between those 2 drives and could have ended the game. Instead they went 3 and out and only took like 12 seconds off the clock. Just 1 first down leaves Detroit with barely any time left in that situation. Then got the ball back with 2 timeouts and immediately fumbled due to a complete lack of pocket awareness.
Up by 2 scores and still didn't go for 4th and 1.I find it somewhat humorous that no one is mentioning the almost 9 minute drive in the 4th quarter that would've sealed it for any properly coached team.
But Eberflose's D prowess showed once again why his defenses have never been elite
That was probably worse than the run run pass punt playcalling in the 2nd to last driveUp by 2 scores and still didn't go for 4th and 1.
Question what role Getsy does play in this ?? Please keep it focused on Getsy
All due respect, he commented about fields in a thread…. About fields.
So you're in a round about way blaming JF. Regardless of The defense.......
Giving up a 26-14 lead in the last 3 min.......is that correct ??
Ya kind of. But you're right that drive was mostly on Getsy. But watching it makes me wonder why we never see Fields make adjustments to the play at the line. Bagent was always calling things out and making adjustments pre snap, killing plays and calling audibles. Why does Fields never do that? Did Fields not have the go ahead to change out of those runs up the middle that had no chance? He just seems to always like up and run whatever was called.
Those are thing we'll never know the answer to but it does make you wonder.
Getsy doesn't help, that's for sure. I wish he played more to Fields' strengths. But we saw a lot of rushing yards today, but the points don't follow. Fields ran for a first down deep in Lion's territory and we the went into a shell. No killer instinct.Question what role Getsy does play in this ?? Please keep it focused on Getsy
The Galloping Ghost said:
I mean he literally did not do that.
Considering they got 4 turnovers off the Lions this game should not have been close. But Justin Fields is a model of inefficiency. His running is great. U til he consistently produces from the pocket the Bears will never be a consistent offense. Especially when it matters most.
"If the Bears defense had held the Lions out of the end zone and won the game, I would feel exactly the same way about Fields. He's not good.enough."
-The Galloping Ghost
Gotcha.....you do not like JF no matter what he does as the Bears Qb.
No, I'm saying I can evaluate Fields' play, his long term potential, and the individual game separately. It's not "Bears win=Fields.good."
Like I said, he was mostly fine today. Fine. Like, he wasn't bad. If that's your standard, so be it. He wasn't the reason the Bears lost. Great. That doesn't make him the long term answer at quarterback. He has sooooo much improvement he needs to make ro.even consider that.
He's done that alot. But this game was over at that point. Sort of like throwing a hail mary with 1 second left. The likelihood to do something there was so low. This one is not on fields. This one is all the conservative approach up 12. I agree with running it down the field when up 9, but youdont just settle for a fg. You try for a td still once in range.Fields also committing another costly game losing turnover.
Fields did have 30 seconds and two TO to get into FG range. When will fields ever be clutch? He had a chance and fumbled. Name one time in fields 30 games he was clutch and won a game? You aren’t being honest with yourself
Normal people spend time posting on a Bears forum?Not that I need to remind the normal people who visit here, but there’s a lot of really dumb, brain dead posters on this forum.
Don’t get me wrong, He played well, but with two timeouts left, there’s still a chance to get to FG range. This is third game this year where Fields had the opportunity to take the Bears down field to tie or take the lead at the end of the game, and he has thrown a pick 6, INT, fumble. If you guys want to hold him to the standards of a franchise “QB” then hold him to those standards, don’t pick and choose when it’s convenient. Stop pampering him.He's done that alot. But this game was over at that point. Sort of like throwing a hail mary with 1 second left. The likelihood to do something there was so low. This one is not on fields. This one is all the conservative approach up 12. I agree with running it down the field when up 9, but youdont just settle for a fg. You try for a td still once in range.
Question what role Getsy does play in this ?? Please keep it focused on Getsy
Getsy doesn't help, that's for sure. I wish he played more to Fields' strengths. But we saw a lot of rushing yards today, but the points don't follow. Fields ran for a first down deep in Lion's territory and we the went into a shell. No killer instinct.
At the time I said kicking on 4th to go up 12 was the right move, but it was the downs before that that were too conservative.
WTF? Bears were at 25. Needed about 35-40 yards for FG position, not even half the length of the entire field.Wasn't it with 29 seconds left and the Bears having to go nearly the entire length of the field? What team have you been watching where they could go down to FG range in 29 seconds from deep in their endzone?
They scored 26 points. That was the 7th points most of any team this week. They had a 12-point lead with 4 minutes left in the game and the defense proceeded to give up 15 points.
In this very game, Tyler Scott dropped a game sealing catch that hit him in the hands. Do you want Fields to go play defense and go catch the ball for Tyler Scott too?
Saying JF consistently putting the Bears in position is a little over the top. The D picked Goff three times.So what we saw today was JF consistently putting the Bear in position to the tune of a 26-14 lead with 3 min left
"Getsy doesn't help, that's for sure. I wish he played more to Fields' strengths."
-TL1961
What you said here speaks volumes. If your OC isn't maximizing and developing the strengths of the Qb......then that seriously hinders the offense. As well as, suspect play calling.
It's like some unskilled mechanic working on your car prior to a cross country trip and your car stalls out in the middle of no where. LOL .....I'm sure we can agree, there's been a lotta stalling with the Bears.
Didn’t I tell you to use the donator forumOh, please, we need no more proof, dumbass. Stop exposing yourself.
No. You said you put my most awesome thread there cause people should have to pay to see it.Didn’t I tell you to use the donator forum