Zvbxrpl
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 3, 2014
- Posts:
- 2,376
- Liked Posts:
- 2,348
KC traded up for the table scraps QB a few years ago. Fields skill set is elite and he has every chance to be the best QB in this class.
If his skill set is elite and he has every chance to be the best QB in the class, then why is he the last taken out of 5 guys at the same position? That makes no sense, but tis the season.
KC also built a damned good OL with weapons and a competent coach who had the luxury to sit that Mahomes guy so he could learn/adapt. Who'd have thought putting a guy in a position to succeed while investing in the other 10 guys Mahomes would be playing with on the offensive unit would create such a result...
But hey--as OP says--fuck the OLine. Fuck protecting the talent at QB. Just get the talent at QB and both starting OTs will somehow figure out how to block when they have a history of not being able to.
Good lord what a lazy comparison.And when Fields ends ups elsewhere and proves to be one of the better QBs from this class we'll here nothing but crickets from you
Fields succeeding elsewhere versus succeeding here are two different situations and comparing them (like Mahomes in KC versus Mahomes here starting with John Fox and Frodo Loggains before Nagy stepping in as opposed to Andry Reid from day 1) is idiotic because Team A in this case and the Bears don't have the exact same problems/needed solutions/schemes/coaches/plans. Yes, that still means Fields has to put it together.
But if you can't distinguish between him coming to a complicated offense where the HC/Playcaller won't tailor his offense to the talent versus him going elsewhere and being put in a position to succeed because a team is ready to invest all efforts in protecting him and getting him weapons before developing him versus Nagy's own words of "there's 101 and 201 with this offense" when the #2 pick and his own systems guy in Nick Foles both couldn't succeed--then I cannot help you.
But hey. I'm sure the 3rd time is the charm.