msadows
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 22,953
- Liked Posts:
- 14,461
because he is;
1. better than Foles
2. better than any QB after pick 18 at least for the next 12 months.
3. better than most of the free agent veterans.
I'm intersted in Darnold, Winston, Bridewater if available, and most especially I would go all-in for Wentz and that means no other QB dollars.
Wentz and a 4th or 5th rounder will do.
1. Yes, and foles doesn't prevent us from signing/drafting anyone. He's making less money than chase daniel was. 6.6m isn't that much for a good backup.
2. More than likely, yes. The rookie we draft shouldn't start week 1, shit year 1, anyways. Trask/Jones are pretty much the only guys we could get at #20.
3. He's the best FA.
Darnold is just as bad as mitch, if not worse. He just hasn't failed here yet so chicago thinks he might be better(lol).
Winston would intrigue me, but we'd get blown out in every game with this defense and his turnovers.
Teddy aint goin nowhere.