- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
Garza one of the best pitchers in MLB?
CO high? :lol:
CO high? :lol:
Garza one of the best pitchers in MLB?
CO high? :lol:
ok now you see what im saying. phew.
Are those Homers hit always the pitchers fault? No, but they count in FIP.
RedBalcony > Home Run off Canseco`s Head
YouTube - Curtis Granderson Inside The Park Homerun
etc.
So HR shouldn't count then either I presume? The pitcher couldn't control either of the two I posted. :shrug:
I didn't realize you were talking about it being a black and white stat. I guess my point was that its very bland stat.
This is a stretch.
He has the best FIP in the Majors, he's a true ace.
Is it good to strikeout a high rate of batters? Yes.
Is it good to limit walks? Yes.
Is it good to keep the ball in the park? Yes.
The specific statistic BA does not have a flaw. Which has nothing to do with my opinion on BA as a evaluation point.
The simple mathmatics behind BA, is as basic of a statistic you are going to find.
CO has no idea what I am trying to say, I dont expect him to.
for one, stop stating in each post how you would "love to hear this" you sound like a fucking 12 year old.
Again, the use of the word statistic is used incorrectly, it is a fact that projections, what ifs, Coulda woulda shoulda are not considered what I learned in school as a statistic which was my minor.
They are not 100% known to be true, that is why they cannot be called statistics.
How does Batting Average not have a flaw? It gives walks absolutely no credit at all. It also counts a homerun and a single the same. Are you telling me that a homerun and a single are equal?
What I am gathering here is that there is math behind BA. It doesn't take into account everything. How is FIP any different? It uses math and doesn't take into account everything.
Well, I would love to hear this. You rarely state anything. You just babble.
But does that make him Roy Halladay? No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics#cite_note-Dodge-0Statistics is the science of the collection, organization, and interpretation of data.
How does Batting Average not have a flaw? It gives walks absolutely no credit at all. It also counts a homerun and a single the same. Are you telling me that a homerun and a single are equal?
What I am gathering here is that there is math behind BA. It doesn't take into account everything. How is FIP any different? It uses math and doesn't take into account everything.
Well, I would love to hear this. You rarely state anything. You just babble.
Read a few posts up. you obviously have no idea what I am trying to say, ask AddisonStation since he knows exactly what I am saying.
Who ever said it did? No one.
Dew, I see what you are getting at.
I'm referring to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics#cite_note-Dodge-0
Ah, a mod calling a poster a Special person....
I can do that if I choose to.
Just like I can say that you're a shitty mod, if I choose to?
Ah, a mod calling a poster a Special person....
You're one to talk.
Same goes for all stats though.
So what's your point?
Dew, how can you just use the "known" facts to evaluate a player?
The unknown what if scenarios and grey areas that have some substance such as FIP and xFIP can be used in conjunction with other stats. I have no problem looking at a players FIP and xFIP, but there is no way I will ever go into a debate using that as my primary backup to a pitchers talent.