Gas Prices

Ymono37

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
4,005
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Suburbia
No, we just steal those.







Hey, if you worked at an adult novelty store, and I came in and grabbed a few giant silicone dongs, swung them wildly around and was yelling "I HAVE THE CHICKEN!", I doubt you would stop me.

You mean you people don't use ones that have been broken in already? Weirdos...



On Topic - I just bought a brand new Hyundai Accent... and the gas mileage so far has been fucking amazing. Not gonna go through all pages - but the trading of "futures" for oil totally blows.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
No, we just steal those.







Hey, if you worked at an adult novelty store, and I came in and grabbed a few giant silicone dongs, swung them wildly around and was yelling "I HAVE THE CHICKEN!", I doubt you would stop me.



I got kicked out of a sex shop in Monreal for holding a giant dildo named "The American Dream" up to my ****, and humping a buddy with it.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
I got kicked out of a sex shop in Monreal for holding a giant dildo named "The American Dream" up to my ****, and humping a buddy with it.

What's with young Canadian males that play hockey acting all *** without being ***? Experimenting?
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
What's with young Canadian males that play hockey acting all *** without being ***? Experimenting?



that, or joking around. which ever.
 

IceHogsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,024
Liked Posts:
0
So why the sudden change of position by Obama regarding the Keystone Pipeline?
 

sth

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
2,851
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Billings, Montana
So why the sudden change of position by Obama regarding the Keystone Pipeline?

Just the southern part. He is trying to please both sides, as he often does. I actually read building the northern half would allow Canada to ship more oil overseas and would at least at first raise midwestern gas prices.
 

sth

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
2,851
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Billings, Montana
Wasn't that a Snicker?

Yeah but then everyone started to do it with all kinds of stuff. Remember Danny Tartabull ate a doughnut with a knife and fork when he was with George.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
So why the sudden change of position by Obama regarding the Keystone Pipeline?

He never waivored that he didn't want it taking a certain route (through North Dakota I believe). He was pissed that the right was using it as some talking point and trying to force it into some other legislation rather than letting the approval process take place to reroute the path away from 'protected lands'.

This pipeline cannot go west to the BC coast. If tankers start filling up there and shipping overseas you could easily see another Exxon Valdez in the near future. The off coast waters are too rough there most of the year for oil barges and tankers. That is why the Canadians wanted US to allow their raw oil to go over our territory and down to a refinery in TX or to an overseas customer from there.

The other way this got politicized (as the right LOVES to mud sling whatever it can to make the left look bad) is the notion that this would provide 1,000s of jobs in the US. Bullshit it will. Most certainly not permanent ones anyways. Also, those jobs might just be owned by a Canadian company that owns much of the operation and pipeline, so the US may not even reap that much in payroll tax (I am no payroll tax expert for that type of job in that part of the country when a foreign company 'owns' the position).
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
quit bitching and boost our economy...err...i mean approve the pipeline!
 

Tater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
13,392
Liked Posts:
5,207
He never waivored that he didn't want it taking a certain route (through North Dakota I believe). He was pissed that the right was using it as some talking point and trying to force it into some other legislation rather than letting the approval process take place to reroute the path away from 'protected lands'.

This pipeline cannot go west to the BC coast. If tankers start filling up there and shipping overseas you could easily see another Exxon Valdez in the near future. The off coast waters are too rough there most of the year for oil barges and tankers. That is why the Canadians wanted US to allow their raw oil to go over our territory and down to a refinery in TX or to an overseas customer from there.

The other way this got politicized (as the right LOVES to mud sling whatever it can to make the left look bad) is the notion that this would provide 1,000s of jobs in the US. Bullshit it will. Most certainly not permanent ones anyways. Also, those jobs might just be owned by a Canadian company that owns much of the operation and pipeline, so the US may not even reap that much in payroll tax (I am no payroll tax expert for that type of job in that part of the country when a foreign company 'owns' the position).



But the temporary highway construction jobs created by the "stimulus" package all count though? Which is it?
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
But the temporary highway construction jobs created by the "stimulus" package all count though? Which is it?



personally, if I was out of work, I would be jumping at ANY job. Perm or temp.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
quit bitching and boost our economy...err...i mean approve the pipeline!
Do you like all dat wildlife and scenary up der in da Canadia? Or do you live in downtown Toronto amidst the concrete jungle?



Continue fucking up the Boreal Forest and your economy will take a giant shit when people in Alberta can't farm anymore and no one wants to travel there to see the beautiful countryside.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
But the temporary highway construction jobs created by the "stimulus" package all count though? Which is it?

I kind of know where you are going with this, but not completely......
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
Do you like all dat wildlife and scenary up der in da Canadia? Or do you live in downtown Toronto amidst the concrete jungle?



Continue fucking up the Boreal Forest and your economy will take a giant shit when people in Alberta can't farm anymore and no one wants to travel there to see the beautiful countryside.



nice try. Of the 910 miles of Keystone pipeline that would be in place in Alberta, 540 miles of it would just be converted from an old pipeline. And Alberta tourism isn't people going up to take a look at the sweet forest, it has to do with the rockies, and the skiing and snowboarding.



or are you arguing about the actual oilsands? Because when they are done with the location, it goes back to what it was before. Funny thing about land, you can easily fix it.
 

Top