- Joined:
- Sep 11, 2011
- Posts:
- 8,250
- Liked Posts:
- 2,804
Just curious FT, who are your 10 better then Deng? Or if not 10 better where would you rank him
Just curious FT, who are your 10 better then Deng? Or if not 10 better where would you rank him
No. It can't..
This team hasn't won shit that means anything at this point. It can't even start to be argued until they win a Championship. Then the discussion can start
I'm officially never listening to a word you say again.
Just curious FT, who are your 10 better then Deng? Or if not 10 better where would you rank him
I can only think of three -- LeBron, Durant, and Carmelo. I could possibly throw Paul Pierce in there. Who else could even be considered? Gerald Wallace? Nope. Rudy ***? Nope. Andre Iguodala? Nope. Gallinari, Granger? Nope.
Deng is borderline top 10 of the SF's. James, Durant, Anthony, Pierce, Iguodala, *** are all better. Gerald Wallace, Gallinari, Granger, and even Marion have a solid case with Batum right there.
Better offensive player: Lopez (by far)
Better rebounder: Noah (extremely)
Better defensive player: Noah (Lopez may be the better pure-shot blocker)
Lopez has a case over Noah because of his scoring. Take off your homer glasses.
Please put a pillowcase over your head and just hold your breath for about five minutes. You have got to be kidding me. So, you're telling me that if the Sixers called the Bulls and you were the GM, you would trade Iguodala straight up for Deng? Same goes with Rudy ***, the guy who missed the playoffs and his team still got to the WCF? Sure thing, pal.
And Danny Granger, the horrendously one-dimensional player who's never played 30 seconds of defense in his life? Wallace, Gallinari, Marion and Batum aren't even in the debate. Jesus tapdancing Christ, that's just a horrific assessment of talent on your part.
Like I said, I can give you Anthony, James and Durant without any argument. Pierce, a guy who's a Hall of Famer and still an effective guy on both ends of the floor, sure. I can see rating him higher than Deng. Everyone else? Not a chance.
So, by your assessment... Noah is better at two out of the three things you put up there, yet Lopez is a better center... The guy who's averaging less than 4 rebounds per game. The guy who does nothing to make his team better. The guy who doesn't play defense. He blocks shots because he's fucking seven feet tall and anyone that size should get at least one block every single game.
Please quit. Just stop.
The fact that you don't think Rudy freaking *** is as good as Luol Deng shows exactly how much you know. Please stop talking.
Lopez has a case over Noah because of his scoring.
You said it right here. Unless you didn't say that. Uh, but you did.
:elephant:
Both of them are limited in their own rights, I agree with that. But a center averaging less than 4 rebounds per game is just pitiful and inexcusable. Besides, Lopez is a *****. I'd much rather have Noah's 10/11/2 and his good chemistry.
Noah plays for the Bulls and Lopez doesn't, so that automatically knocks Noah down, because we can't look like homers and it elevates Lopez because then we're being objective.Both of them are limited in their own rights, I agree with that. But a center averaging less than 4 rebounds per game is just pitiful and inexcusable. Besides, Lopez is a *****. I'd much rather have Noah's 10/11/2 and his good chemistry.