97Bulls
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 25, 2011
- Posts:
- 951
- Liked Posts:
- 223
And how old were you when Magic Johnson was in his prime? How old were you when Elgin Baylor was playing?
I was 11 in 85. I remember him vividly during the back to back years which put me at 13 and 14.
Who the hell are you to put someone down for their age, your only argument about every player sans Pippen is they are overrated. You crap on what Magic can do by saying Pippen could have stepped in and did what he did...Pippen has NEVER been able to play on Magic's level...to make that statement is tragic. You have gone from Pippen was robbed of a DPOY award...to Pippen could have been a 3 time MVP in the 1980's? Give me a damn break.
I never said pippen could've won 3 mvps or lead a team to multiple championships. I've always maintained that he could've led a team to 1 championship. I maintain pippen even after Jordans retirement was a top 3-5 player and if given the best talent in the league would've done much better based on what he did with little to no talent.
find me one legit NBA fan (you ain't one) who would take Pippen as a better player than Kobe Bryant...one fan with any...ANY sanity. Find me one fan who thinks Pippen should even be mentioned in the same paragraph with Magic Johnson.
I fail to see the point of this, I live in los angeles now. There's a lot of laker fans that feel kobe is overrated. And even if I did present them to you, you'd just call them haters.
Saying that Pippen couldn't do what Stockton did is somehow a ludicrous statement? You think Stocktons grow on trees?
What are you talking about?
That said, you didn't answer my question, because you know the truth. If Magic and Kobe were on the same team as Pippen, who would be the franchise player and who would be the sidekick? Who gives a shit? You do! You have been making the same argument for months now. Pippen as franchise player wins titles, as if Jordan held him back.
I didn't back off anything. I said it doesn't matter. Your going based on what the three player accomplished right? Ivw alwys maintined that talent wise, there not much difference between the top 20-25 players. What different is the conditions.
NOBODY said Pippen wasn't instrumental to the Bulls titles, so you can keep that b.s. I asked you a simple question...you know the answer and can't admit it because it shits on your argument. Pippen couldn't take Gasol and beat the Celtics...Pippen couldn't take Worthy and Jabbar and beat the Celtics...because he wasn't as good as those players. I would go so far as to say you couldn't replace Worthy with Pippen and win like they did. Why? Pippen couldn't score like Worthy could.
rami made the implication when I asked him if the bulls could win a championship without replacing pippen and he said yes. Even multiple. And kobe didn't just have gasol. He had odom and bynum as well as fisher. And if all pippen has to do is shoot 41%, yes I feel with those players, he could won a few championships. And I feel worthy is overrated too.
And you continue to point to Kobe's FG%...look at the two player's true shooting percentages. Kobe's is better...why? Because he was a better long range shooter, and a much better free throw shooter. We don't even have to get technical. I don't have to talk about Kobe's superior ability to create off the dribble and his volume shooting being a necessity. Pippen, comparable to players at his position, was a horrendous free throw shooter. The best at that position routinely shot 80% from the line...Pippen spent a lot of his career shooting like a center from the free throw line. Kobe is an 11-time all defensive player...so he is proven to be a great defender, but he is a much better offensive player than Pippen was. Scoring 50 points wasn't Pippen's game...because Pippen couldn't score 50 points. Stop the madness...
True shooting drasticlly overrates 3 pt shooting. Beseides....... thers no stat that can really put into perspective kobes penchant for taking 2 or 3 bad shots a game.