why you no like bolland? coulda sworn you liked him, maybe im not seeing the epurple somehow haha
It's a bit of a joke at this point...but I'm not as big of a fan as some are..and wouldn't be heartbroken if he left.
I just think he's "over rated" as some sort of shut down player. The fact some think he stops Sedin (isn't true...he produces at the same PPG vs Bolland as everyone else in the playoffs)....just is blown out of proportion.
My biggest frustration of him as a player is I haven't seen any physical improvement out of him in the 7yrs in the league.
I've heard Kane get criticised during his early years about his partying..but I've seen him get bigger, stronger, faster in the off seasons.
Toews has physically gotten stronger since coming into the league.
Leddy, Kruger both physically have gotten bigger/stronger
Frolik, Bickell, Stalberg...all went to Europe to get better in the off season (as Kane, Oduya did)
Crawford worked on his game/quickness this off season.
There's no reason, IMO...he couldn't have put on 10-15lbs of muscle in the last 7yrs. I think some strength added would improve his board play, his pathetic face off percentage, and maybe limit some of his injuries/add a physical element to the game. There's no reason (again, IMO) he can't be more of a Mike Fisher type of player - where offensively, they're similar...but he's much more physically stronger of a player
I think Bolland has a good head for the game. I know Q loves the guy...I just really question what he's ever done to add to his game, as most other players have done in Chicago.