Bearin' Down
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 5,247
- Liked Posts:
- 3,246
- Location:
- Chicago
x 1 million.
You're too dumb for words. You seeing Tuitt getting "stonewalled" is him playing technique gap sound football.
As I said you have ZERO clear as to what you are evaluating. I've explained why and how repeatedly. You repeating the same incorrect evaluation points isn't a counter to them being proven wrong. it's just you being wrong...AGAIN.
The rest of what you posted is basically you, repeating your already ignorant evaluation points.
Piece of advice: you don't want to be called an idiot, cease being one.
LOL At Tuitt going in Round 3. Tell ya what, if Tuitt goes earlier than Round 3 you get banned from the board forever. Deal?
Maybe lighten up a bit. We aren't discussing the end of the world right now. We are talking about an NFL draft prospect. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm not. It doesn't really matter, after all, it's only my opinion. My issue with your statement is that you've made this conclusion that I'm wrong and haven't backed it up, except by making other conclusions. At most, you've said one of my statements is wrong. You've also agreed on, at least, one of my statements. So, if you're in agreement with even one of my statements how could my original statement be laughably wrong? Maybe we are laughably wrong together? Regardless, there are still three more points you have to address to show me how I'm laughably wrong. Conclusions won't suffice. Put in the work and show me how I'm laughably wrong.