I think we’re going to have to worry about Jordan Love being great, guys.

jsu34

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
3,696
Liked Posts:
2,999
Location:
City Of Big Shoulders
GB would have a minute to respond with 2 timeouts.
And yet they didn't have to. We really have no idea what happens. They could have won in those 2 minutes with a td drive or field goal. Or maybe the Saints stop them. We can speculate all we want or go with what actually happened up to that point.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
46,574
Liked Posts:
35,815
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
You’re overreacting to tiny sample sizes.

The Bears are awful and they were in a competitive game with Tampa Bay at Tampa Bay.

Their other game is against another terrible team.

You also had zero chance to beat Tampa Bay if Carr is the QB the whole game.

Are you fucking brain dead?
...
 

Probie2429

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 20, 2013
Posts:
3,954
Liked Posts:
2,606
Love is doing exactly what he should against bad teams which the Bears, Falcons, and Saints are. The slow starts will catch up to the Packers eventually.
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
19,848
Liked Posts:
11,057
Location:
Texas
You didn't see him rattle off three straight 4th quarter scoring drives to beat one of the leagues best d's?

You are aware that Rodgers, Mahomes, etc have all had worse games then that, against much lesser d's, right? Love plays really good for two weeks straight, and then you criticize him because his third game is only okay? lol?
I saw two bs Pass int calls that got them 70 yards down the field....and again he will be a good QB 12-15 once tape gets out...also Saints couldn't move ball vs that pathetic defense ur talking about
 

Britbuffguy

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 29, 2017
Posts:
6,027
Liked Posts:
4,497
Location:
Madison, WI
The Saints were 2-0 (Not a bad team) and the Saints D is one of the best in the league. We figured them out in the 4th quarter and rattled off 4 straight drives deep into their territory, and 3 straight scoring drives to win the game. We did this without our best WR, best RB, starting LT and starting LG. That is the real Packers O, just wait until we get all these young (Leagues youngest O) guys in sync with each other, and also getting all of our injured stars back.

The Packers had 11 penaltys and gave up more yardage then the Saints on penaltys.

Nothing mediocre about us, 2-1 without even getting in sync offensively yet, completely riddled with injuries to star players too, on both sides of the ball.
And they still had to have a missed FG to win.

Saints, Falcons and Buccs were all 2-0, and they are all fraud 2-0 teams.

I'm debating doubling down on the shitty Packers this week. Pick the Lions to not only win the game with 16 confidence points, but pick the Lions for the Survival League to boot. :)
 

Britbuffguy

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 29, 2017
Posts:
6,027
Liked Posts:
4,497
Location:
Madison, WI
Love is doing exactly what he should against bad teams which the Bears, Falcons, and Saints are. The slow starts will catch up to the Packers eventually.
Sadly, besides the Lion this week, the Packers have the bland Raiders, Steelers and Rams, as well as the winless Vikings and Broncos coming up. Much like the Bears, the Packers don't face many good teams.

There's a string there where they face the Chargers, Lions and Chiefs, but then end with four bad teams.
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,351
Liked Posts:
10,160
Nope, read what I said. Dropped passes aren't his fault. Then he has a lot of throw aways and deep pass atts.

Led the league in TD passes and passer rating going into the day. Has 7 TD passes, 1 INT, 1 rushing TD and a 105+ rating. HOFer.
And some diving catches that are off target. If you gonna mention some drops, mention those too. He is completing 53% of his passes with a YPA below 7. He has looked better that I thought and coaches have put him in a great position. Only been sacked 3 times all year with one of the lowest pressure rates of any QB.

You ASSUME since you had back to back HOF QBs that you will have a 3rd that shits out gold. Atleast be objective with what you have seen through 3 games. But no, you are a Packers fan so that is too much to ask.
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,351
Liked Posts:
10,160
And they still had to have a missed FG to win.

Saints, Falcons and Buccs were all 2-0, and they are all fraud 2-0 teams.

I'm debating doubling down on the shitty Packers this week. Pick the Lions to not only win the game with 16 confidence points, but pick the Lions for the Survival League to boot. :)
Well Love could have came back down 2 with a minute to go… Even though he couldn’t do that a week ago with even more time against a worst team lol.
 

Britbuffguy

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 29, 2017
Posts:
6,027
Liked Posts:
4,497
Location:
Madison, WI
I just read that Carr was out most of the second half. Well, that makes more sense why they couldn't score all half.

Guess the Packer fan forgot to mention that.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
I saw two bs Pass int calls that got them 70 yards down the field....and again he will be a good QB 12-15 once tape gets out...also Saints couldn't move ball vs that pathetic defense ur talking about

Lol? You realize both those PI's were obvious and flagrant penalty? Noone disputed that, it was obvious.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
I just read that Carr was out most of the second half. Well, that makes more sense why they couldn't score all half.

Guess the Packer fan forgot to mention that.

We would beat them regardless of who their QB was, if we had Watson, Jones, Bahktiari, Jenkins, Alexander, Stokes, Campbell etc.

Not to mention. Jameis didn't do much worse then Carr.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
And they still had to have a missed FG to win.

Saints, Falcons and Buccs were all 2-0, and they are all fraud 2-0 teams.

I'm debating doubling down on the shitty Packers this week. Pick the Lions to not only win the game with 16 confidence points, but pick the Lions for the Survival League to boot. :)

If that had been made, GB would have had a minute and two timeouts to respond.

Saints will be alright with healthy Carr, but now with his injury I'm not sure.

Packers will win on Thursday night. This is Jordan Love's coming out party to the league on primetime.
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
19,848
Liked Posts:
11,057
Location:
Texas
Lol? You realize both those PI's were obvious and flagrant penalty? Noone disputed that, it was obvious.
Ummm the announcer even said that there isn't much there......the second one, there DB did exact same on Saints near sideline.
 

Top