I think we’re going to have to worry about Jordan Love being great, guys.

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Ummm the announcer even said that there isn't much there......the second one, there DB did exact same on Saints near sideline.

GB got called for 11 penaltys and more yardage. The second PI was the much smaller of the two.
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,350
Liked Posts:
9,755
I just read that Carr was out most of the second half. Well, that makes more sense why they couldn't score all half.

Guess the Packer fan forgot to mention that.
yes this was the difference maker. announcers said Packers put up 18 unanswered points at the close of the 4th quarter. I wonder why?

every Packer game this season should have an asterisk next to the wins. face it McLuvinitout, Love isn't as good as you think he is. fucking fantard homo
 

doctorbear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 11, 2014
Posts:
2,648
Liked Posts:
1,899
Not worried about Love, at all. I don’t think he’s that good

I mean as a fan… I don’t have the fucking luxury to start to care about other teams right now. Bears organization is a total fucking failure and some sort of epic reconstruction from the GM down that is a completely different move from the last 20 years will be needed for me to gain confidence in this team.

Then I’ll think about the state of other teams in the division.
 

ijustposthere

Message Board Hero
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
34,253
Liked Posts:
26,381
Location:
Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Purdue Boilermakers
Sorry to say it.
7-16 for 104 yards in the 4th and still needed a missed FG and a Carr injury to pull that one out. He made a couple decent throws near the end, but he really doesn't look good at all and his TD% is due for some hardcore regression.
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
19,848
Liked Posts:
11,057
Location:
Texas
GB got called for 11 penaltys and more yardage. The second PI was the much smaller of the two.
Lol they literally called 6 penalties on the Saints in the last 4 min of the game...most were killers...again the pathetic Defense stopped the Saints
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Lol they literally called 6 penalties on the Saints in the last 4 min of the game...most were killers...again the pathetic Defense stopped the Saints

Source? It didn't seem like that many. And only 2 of them were before GB had taken the lead.

None of those penalties were 'killers' except for the long PI, stop making up nonsense. Packers had been getting shitty calls against them along day, hence the more penalties and yardage.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
7-16 for 104 yards in the 4th and still needed a missed FG and a Carr injury to pull that one out. He made a couple decent throws near the end, but he really doesn't look good at all and his TD% is due for some hardcore regression.

If the FG was good, GB would have had time to respond. Furthermore, Carr didn't play much better then Jameis, not clear if he would have made a difference.

Regardless, the Packers would beat the Carr led Saints easily if we weren't lacking Watson, Jones, Bahktiari, Jenkins, Alexander, Stokes, and Campbell. Would have beaten the Falcons too, and been 3-0.

Lol? Jordan Love looks great thus far. He literally has been a top 3 QB thus far. Once again, you just tell yourself 'he doesn't look as good as his numbers' because you are tired of GB having HOF QBs lol. Face it. The numbers don't lie.

Love will be MVP favorite late Thursday evening.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Not worried about Love, at all. I don’t think he’s that good

I mean as a fan… I don’t have the fucking luxury to start to care about other teams right now. Bears organization is a total fucking failure and some sort of epic reconstruction from the GM down that is a completely different move from the last 20 years will be needed for me to gain confidence in this team.

Then I’ll think about the state of other teams in the division.

And it doesn't make sense for you to feel that way, because Jordan Love's numbers say he is a top 3 QB. You are just telling yourself he won't be as good as his numbers indicate because you are tired of GB having HOF QBs lol.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
yes this was the difference maker. announcers said Packers put up 18 unanswered points at the close of the 4th quarter. I wonder why?

every Packer game this season should have an asterisk next to the wins. face it McLuvinitout, Love isn't as good as you think he is. fucking fantard homo

Carr went out at the beginning of the second half. What bearing does that have on Love taking the Saints phenomenal D to pound town on the last three drives?

You have no reason to claim Love isn't as good as his numbers say, you are only claiming that because you are tired of GB having HOF QBs lol.

Statistics don't lie, Love is a top 3 QB, by this time next week he will be the best QB in the league statistically, like he was going into week 3.
 

BradyJay

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 4, 2012
Posts:
2,161
Liked Posts:
1,399
Location:
WI Dells, WI
I think he can be good to very good. I'm not seeing "great." He reminds me of a Jimmy G type QB.
 

onebud34

Packer Fan
Donator
Joined:
Aug 16, 2011
Posts:
22,560
Liked Posts:
12,393
Location:
Favorite Corner Bar
My favorite teams
  1. Minnesota Twins
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Minnesota Wild
Still not sold on him. The Aints would've scored more in the second half if Carr was in the game. So far Love looks really good against the Bears/prevent D.
 

doctorbear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 11, 2014
Posts:
2,648
Liked Posts:
1,899
And it doesn't make sense for you to feel that way, because Jordan Love's numbers say he is a top 3 QB. You are just telling yourself he won't be as good as his numbers indicate because you are tired of GB having HOF QBs lol.
What? I literally couldn’t give a **** dork. Great, GB has another HOF QB. I am totally comfortable checking out as I have been on my team for 10 years. I’m here shitting on the bears for 95% of my posts and you think I got blinders on for Packers players?

I just don’t think he’s that good. If he ends up being a HOF I won’t give a shit. Too old and have been thru too much losing to give a shit anymore lol.
 

ijustposthere

Message Board Hero
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
34,253
Liked Posts:
26,381
Location:
Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Purdue Boilermakers
If the FG was good, GB would have had time to respond. Furthermore, Carr didn't play much better then Jameis, not clear if he would have made a difference.

Regardless, the Packers would beat the Carr led Saints easily if we weren't lacking Watson, Jones, Bahktiari, Jenkins, Alexander, Stokes, and Campbell. Would have beaten the Falcons too, and been 3-0.

Lol? Jordan Love looks great thus far. He literally has been a top 3 QB thus far. Once again, you just tell yourself 'he doesn't look as good as his numbers' because you are tired of GB having HOF QBs lol. Face it. The numbers don't lie.

Love will be MVP favorite late Thursday evening.
He's been a top 3 QB by what metric?
 

BNB

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 9, 2011
Posts:
15,643
Liked Posts:
8,433
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  2. Oakland Raiders
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
The best thing we can hope for is Love being an average QB, winning the Packers about 8 games this season. Then he gets a huge contract and the Packers are mediocre for the foreseeable future.

Love looks just okay, not elite. He's not "win the division every year" talent, like Rodgers or Favre.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
I think he can be good to very good. I'm not seeing "great." He reminds me of a Jimmy G type QB.

Doesn't make sense. Love was projected as a high ceiling, low floor boom or bust type player with Mahomes level arm talent. That doesn't in anyway translate to Garrapalo.

Not to mention, when has Garrapalo ever had numbers as good as Love has right now? When had he ever led the league in TD passes and passer rating like Love did going into the week?
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
The best thing we can hope for is Love being an average QB, winning the Packers about 8 games this season. Then he gets a huge contract and the Packers are mediocre for the foreseeable future.

Love looks just okay, not elite. He's not "win the division every year" talent, like Rodgers or Favre.

Wrong. Love led the league in passing TDs and passer rating going into the week. That is elite, not 'okay'. Love is still currently arguably the best QB in the league statistically. That is elite, not 'okay'.

You are just claiming nonsense because you are tired of the Packers having HOF QBs lol. Look at Love's first three games as starter compared to Rodgers and Favre, Love is on a better trajectory then either of them, especially Favre.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Still not sold on him. The Aints would've scored more in the second half if Carr was in the game. So far Love looks really good against the Bears/prevent D.

Love hasn't faced prevent defenses at all this season. Making up bullshit makes you look pathetic.

Love had two really good games and then an okay game where he had a three score comeback against one of the best D's in the league. Without Watson, Jones, Bahktiari, Jenkins, Alexander, Stokes, and Campbell I add.

Love is a HOFer man. Arguably the best QB in the league right now. statistically.
 

Top