I think we’re going to have to worry about Jordan Love being great, guys.

ijustposthere

Message Board Hero
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
34,253
Liked Posts:
26,381
Location:
Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Purdue Boilermakers
Stat line. 7 TDs, 1 INT, 2 rushing TD's and 95 passer rating. He is having a better season then every star QB in the league, Mahomes, Allen, Burrow, etc.
Hang on to that as hard as you can buddy
 

BNB

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 9, 2011
Posts:
15,643
Liked Posts:
8,433
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  2. Oakland Raiders
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Wrong. Love led the league in passing TDs and passer rating going into the week. That is elite, not 'okay'. Love is still currently arguably the best QB in the league statistically. That is elite, not 'okay'.

You are just claiming nonsense because you are tired of the Packers having HOF QBs lol. Look at Love's first three games as starter compared to Rodgers and Favre, Love is on a better trajectory then either of them, especially Favre.
Dude... are you serious? haha. Leading the NFL in touchdowns and passer rating after 2 WEEKS (one game against arguably the worst defense in the league) means a guy is elite? C'mon... Why not point out that he's 33rd in completion percentage? Or 17th in YPG? Those rankings definitely aren't elite.

If he's leading the NFL in both categories near the end of the season, then we'll talk.

Listen, I hate the Packers, but I'm not biased. Before Mahomes came along, I would acknowledge that Aaron Rodgers was probably the most talented QB of all-time.

When I watch Love play, I see mediocrity. I don't think he's bad... I just don't see him being a guy that you look at and say, "as long as we have him, we have a chance."
 

Diehardfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
9,616
Liked Posts:
7,003
Location:
Western Burbs
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Does it really make a difference? They've had HOF QBs for the last 30 years.....30 fucking years....and won 2 Super Bowls. yeah, yeah, yeah....big time regular season stuff. Who the hell cares? The best part is looking at all those green and gold crying faces as they get bumped out again. So let him talk all his shit....at least we know out team is going nowhere. The Cheeseheads get to go all year thinking their team is good just to get to watch reality slap them in the face once again.
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
19,848
Liked Posts:
11,057
Location:
Texas
Source? It didn't seem like that many. And only 2 of them were before GB had taken the lead.

None of those penalties were 'killers' except for the long PI, stop making up nonsense. Packers had been getting shitty calls against them along day, hence the more penalties and yardage.
Source is me watching the game and called it out in the around the league....Packers had one, a holding on PR
 

HoopsMcCann

Member
Joined:
Sep 11, 2023
Posts:
58
Liked Posts:
22
My favorite teams
  1. Texas Longhorns
Can't we agree to revisit this week nine, to see how things look after a larger and more diverse sample size?
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Hang on to that as hard as you can buddy

Hang onto his stats? Okay. That is how we measure players on field production lol.

Im sorry you dont like it man, but you not wanting GB to have another HOF QB doesnt change the fact that Love has statistically been the best QB in the league thus far.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Dude... are you serious? haha. Leading the NFL in touchdowns and passer rating after 2 WEEKS (one game against arguably the worst defense in the league) means a guy is elite? C'mon... Why not point out that he's 33rd in completion percentage? Or 17th in YPG? Those rankings definitely aren't elite.

If he's leading the NFL in both categories near the end of the season, then we'll talk.

Listen, I hate the Packers, but I'm not biased. Before Mahomes came along, I would acknowledge that Aaron Rodgers was probably the most talented QB of all-time.

When I watch Love play, I see mediocrity. I don't think he's bad... I just don't see him being a guy that you look at and say, "as long as we have him, we have a chance."

His completion pct. is low because of his WRs dropping tons of passes, and also because he throws it away alot and takes alot of deep shots. YPG is nonsense, Rodgers never had high YPG numbers under Lafluer either, this is because we run the ball too much.

Its not just after two weeks, after three weeks, Love is currently the best QB in the league by the numbers. Im sorry, but being the leagues best QB statistically is as good as one could possibly even do lol.

Aaaaand you are just trying to convince yourself of that because you dont want GB to have another HOF QB lol. By the numbers, you have no reason whatsoever to say that about Love. When you have watched Love play this season, you have seen the leagues best QB through three games, you have told yourself that somehow equals 'mediocrity', but thats only because your an idiot who is tired of GB winning the division lol.

Love has had a much better start then Favre or Rodgers did. Neither of them were the best QB in the league after three games.
 
Last edited:

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Source is me watching the game and called it out in the around the league....Packers had one, a holding on PR

You are making up nonsense, those 2 PIs were the only penaltys the Saints had in the closing minutes. Packers had 11 penaltys all game and were penalized for more yardage then the Saints.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Love was 9/21 and an INT before the Saints went into prevent D

They never went into a prevent D, they were playing there base D all game. Stop making up nonsense. Just because Love owned the Saints D on the last three drives doesnt equate to it having been 'prevent', it wasnt. It was the Saints base regular D.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Can't we agree to revisit this week nine, to see how things look after a larger and more diverse sample size?
Sure, but there is no denying he has been great thus far. He is currently the leagues best QB by the numbers. Another HOF QB for GB.
 

BNB

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 9, 2011
Posts:
15,643
Liked Posts:
8,433
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  2. Oakland Raiders
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
His completion pct. is low because of his WRs dropping tons of passes, and also because he throws it away alot and takes alot of deep shots. YPG is nonsense, Rodgers never had high YPG numbers under Lafluer either, this is because we run the ball too much.

Its not just after two weeks, after three weeks, Love is currently the best QB in the league by the numbers. Im sorry, but being the leagues best QB statistically is as good as one could possibly even do lol.

Aaaaand you are just trying to convince yourself of that because you dont want GB to have another HOF QB lol. By the numbers, you have no reason whatsoever to say that about Love. When you have watched Love play this season, you have seen the leagues best QB through three games, you have told yourself that somehow equals 'mediocrity', but thats only because your an idiot who is tired of GB winning the division lol.

Love has had a much better start then Favre or Rodgers did. Neither of them were the best QB in the league after three games.

1. No, it was 2. You said going into the week. After his relatively poor performance against the Saints, his passer rating dropped quite a bit. Now he's 13th in the league, not "leading the league" as you said.

2. Now you're just making things up. The Packers have 2 drops this season. That doesn't explain his poor completion percentage.

3. I'm not trying to convince myself of anything. Do I want the Packers to have another HOF QB? Of course not. But that isn't impacting my view on how Love has looked. Again, I acknowledged that Aaron Rodgers was great. I even admitted it after his first season starting. I'd do the same with Love if I saw it, but I don't.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
1. No, it was 2. You said going into the week. After his relatively poor performance against the Saints, his passer rating dropped quite a bit. Now he's 13th in the league, not "leading the league" as you said.

2. Now you're just making things up. The Packers have 2 drops this season. That doesn't explain his poor completion percentage.

3. I'm not trying to convince myself of anything. Do I want the Packers to have another HOF QB? Of course not. But that isn't impacting my view on how Love has looked. Again, I acknowledged that Aaron Rodgers was great. I even admitted it after his first season starting. I'd do the same with Love if I saw it, but I don't.

1. Yes, Love was the best QB in the league going into this week. Then i said, its not just after two weeks, its also after three. Pay attention. Love's passer rating went down a bit sure, but he is still 2nd in passing TDs and 1st in total TD's for any QB. He also as the lowest INT% and the best TD to Int ratio. Best QB in the league thus far.

Also, his performance against the Saints wasnt poor lol. He had an all around okay game, 1 passing TD, 1 INT, 1 Rushing TD and 200+ yards. He had a fantastic 4th quarter. Love has been really good, really good, then okay (with a great 4th quarter comeback against a great D) in his three games thus far. He also has done this without Watson, Jones, Bahktiari, Jenkins etc.

2. Packers have way more then two drops, not sure what advanced stats you are reading from, but they must not be counting broken up passes that were in the WRs hands as drops. Notice I also pointed out he throws it away alot to avoid sacks, and also takes alot of deep shots.

3. Yes, you are, and yes, it is lol. Jordan Love has been the best QB in the league thus far, there is no way any rational person who has seen him play could say he hasnt looked very good at the least, unless you are just a salty NFCN fan who is tired of GB having HOF QBs lol.

Love has undeniably had a better first 3 games then either Favre or Rodgers, you are aware of this, yes? If you wont admit that he looks great, then you wouldn't have admitted that either of them looked great either. Statistics dont lie man, Love has been the leagues best QB, or at least one of them. If he was a Bears QB doing this right now your fanbase would be more excited then you have been for anything since 1985 lol.
 

BNB

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 9, 2011
Posts:
15,643
Liked Posts:
8,433
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  2. Oakland Raiders
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
1. Yes, Love was the best QB in the league going into this week. Then i said, its not just after two weeks, its also after three. Pay attention. Love's passer rating went down a bit sure, but he is still 2nd in passing TDs and 1st in total TD's for any QB. He also as the lowest INT% and the best TD to Int ratio. Best QB in the league thus far.

Also, his performance against the Saints wasnt poor lol. He had an all around okay game, 1 passing TD, 1 INT, 1 Rushing TD and 200+ yards. He had a fantastic 4th quarter. Love has been really good, really good, then okay (with a great 4th quarter comeback against a great D) in his three games thus far. He also has done this without Watson, Jones, Bahktiari, Jenkins etc.

2. Packers have way more then two drops, not sure what advanced stats you are reading from, but they must not be counting broken up passes that were in the WRs hands as drops. Notice I also pointed out he throws it away alot to avoid sacks, and also takes alot of deep shots.

3. Yes, you are, and yes, it is lol. Jordan Love has been the best QB in the league thus far, there is no way any rational person who has seen him play could say he hasnt looked very good at the least, unless you are just a salty NFCN fan who is tired of GB having HOF QBs lol.

Love has undeniably had a better first 3 games then either Favre or Rodgers, you are aware of this, yes? If you wont admit that he looks great, then you wouldn't have admitted that either of them looked great either. Statistics dont lie man, Love has been the leagues best QB, or at least one of them. If he was a Bears QB doing this right now your fanbase would be more excited then you have been for anything since 1985 lol.

you really need to drop the whole "He's been better than Favre and Rodgers in the first 3 games" argument. Who gives a ****? Plenty of QBs have had a better start than Rodgers, it doesn't mean they wound up better haha.

Dude... Look up the stats. You are literally just making shit up.


This season:

Jordan Love has 0 balls thrown away. You claim he has a lot.

Jordan Love has had 2 passes dropped. You say he has a lot.

His bad throw % is 13.5%, which ranks 10th worst in the league.

His on target % is 37.5%, which ranks 32nd in the league.

But sure.... he's been the best QB in the league this season and the reason why his completion percentage sucks is because of dropped passes and throw aways, which obviously isn't true.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
you really need to drop the whole "He's been better than Favre and Rodgers in the first 3 games" argument. Who gives a ****? Plenty of QBs have had a better start than Rodgers, it doesn't mean they wound up better haha.

Dude... Look up the stats. You are literally just making shit up.


This season:

Jordan Love has 0 balls thrown away. You claim he has a lot.

Jordan Love has had 2 passes dropped. You say he has a lot.

His bad throw % is 13.5%, which ranks 10th worst in the league.

His on target % is 37.5%, which ranks 32nd in the league.

But sure.... he's been the best QB in the league this season and the reason why his completion percentage sucks is because of dropped passes and throw aways, which obviously isn't true.

You obviously didnt read "Packers have way more then two drops, not sure what advanced stats you are reading from, but they must not be counting broken up passes that were in the WRs hands as drops."

Okay so you didnt respond to most of my post. Therefore you admit you cannot argue the numbers. 2nd most TD passes, most total TDs for a QB, lowest INT%, Best TD to INT ratio etc. All without his best WR, best RB, starting LT, and starting LG. League's best QB.

Can you name a few QBs who had a better first three games as starter then Rodgers? Ill spot you one, Jordan Love, name a few more.
 
Last edited:

Iron Lion

New member
Joined:
Sep 26, 2023
Posts:
85
Liked Posts:
21
My favorite teams
  1. Detroit Lions
I'm super confused. I could swear I'm seeing a GB fan on a Bears forum repeatedly copy/pasting "7TD/1INT + stats don't lie + we have injuries" as if it's some kind of flex.

Stafford in his first full year put up 41 TDs and 5K yards. Vince Young and Sam Bradford were rookies of the year. Ben Roethlisberger won his first 17,000 starts in a row. And then once the tape was out on these guys, production dipped. Some of them counterpunched, and some didn't, but none of them had the same success again. Stafford never had those numbers again, Roethlisberger never had that win streak again, and the other two chumps never recovered from the NFL figuring them out.

Also, let me get this straight. "Stats don't lie" but also "He's only completing 50% because of throw aways and guys dropping passes." Well which is it? Can I just look at the stats which do not lie, or do I have to look at the tape?

Also:

20230721_163004.jpg
 

ijustposthere

Message Board Hero
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
34,253
Liked Posts:
26,381
Location:
Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Purdue Boilermakers
Hang onto his stats? Okay. That is how we measure players on field production lol.

Im sorry you dont like it man, but you not wanting GB to have another HOF QB doesnt change the fact that Love has statistically been the best QB in the league thus far.
He'll be bottom half by season's end. When the metrics don't come close to matching the production, something usually gives
 

Probie2429

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 20, 2013
Posts:
3,954
Liked Posts:
2,606
Packers have faced Fields, Ridder, and Carr/Winston. The only above average QB is Carr, and they were getting pasted until he got hurt. Their first true test is the Lions on Thursday.

Injuries are part of the NFL and each team has them. Bahk has been injured going on 4 years now. Him being out is expected. The only guy that is likely hurting them is Watson, but since Love’s accuracy downfield is questionable not sure if Watson will be utilized properly. RB is a dime a dozen position in the NFL unless you’re a generational player which Aaron Jones is not.
 

Dstone5553

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 5, 2017
Posts:
895
Liked Posts:
642
He's looked very good. After week one, I told my neighbor, who is a freaking GB fan, that I would trade QBs no questions asked. Before week one, I don't think many Bears fans would have made that trade.

A lot of this is luck but you have to give GB credit for hitting on QBs (free Agency and draft) the way they have for the last 30 years, it's pretty amazing. Who knows what Love will do but I think he's showing the NFL that he could be real good.

I get Bears fans wanting to believe this just isn't true due to the nausea that follows every announcer and graphic showing how many QBs we've had compared to them--the thought of this continuing is a pretty f-ing dreadful one.

But you have to give them credit, not only for picking the right guys (football wise), but for putting them in a position to succeed.

Our franchise has proven pretty clearly that it hasn't been able to do either when it comes to the most important position in sports.
 

Top