- Joined:
- Aug 16, 2011
- Posts:
- 9,049
- Liked Posts:
- 5,404
I agree. Cutler is better as well as more exciting than Orton. No doubt.
But that wasn't the point, or the question. I was responding to Digits' assertion that the Bears would have won 9 or less of their previous 31 games without Cutler, and Panda's assertion that they would be 2-14 without him.
how do you think they would have done without Cutler? I think we saw what happened when he went down.