- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
...Did not answer a single question I asked......
Did you watch Harrison Smith play football in 2016?
...Did not answer a single question I asked......
So, naturally, the question arises...or has arisen 58 times already...what makes you think Amos is comparable to Harrison Smith?
So, naturally, the question arises...or has arisen 58 times already...what makes you think Amos is comparable to Harrison Smith?
The point was Smith has the same lack of interceptions and PDs as Amos so it was an example of why I like to look at PFF to see how they have guys graded.
Did you watch Harrison Smith play football in 2016?
So twice.I watched him play whenever he played the Bears
So twice.
Got it.
You don't watch these guys enough to form opinions of your own but watch them enough to defend 3rd party opinions and the methodology of those opinions.
:aj:
Unbelievable.
Wouldn't the overall effectiveness of a defense and past performance of a player be more telling of an individual player's talents as opposed to reading PFF giving Harrison Smith an "81" while Adrian Amos receives an "80"? For instance, do you really need PFF to tell you that Minnesota's CBs are better than Chicago's CBs...couldn't you just look at the pass defense statistics and draw that conclusion based on the empirical data?
I guess my issue is that I look at empirical data and draw conclusions...you have your conclusions drawn for you by PFF. Yet here we are on Page 14, and you still have yet to contribute a single cogent thought.
Wouldn't the overall effectiveness of a defense and past performance of a player be more telling of an individual player's talents as opposed to reading PFF giving Harrison Smith an "81" while Adrian Amos receives an "80"? For instance, do you really need PFF to tell you that Minnesota's CBs are better than Chicago's CBs...couldn't you just look at the pass defense statistics and draw that conclusion based on the empirical data?
I guess my issue is that I look at empirical data and draw conclusions...you have your conclusions drawn for you by PFF. Yet here we are on Page 14, and you still have yet to contribute a single cogent thought.
No you don't.I know those 3rd parties watch every play
yes.Or are you going to claim you watched all of Smith's snaps this year?
Better, worse or interchangeable?
Pro Football Focus <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Pro Football Reference
Stats or grades >>>>>>>>>>>>>> statsgrades
Cheese heads <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< head cheese
No you don't.
yes.
But that's not what I asked. I asked you "Wouldn't the overall effectiveness of a defense and past performance of a player be more telling of an individual player's talents as opposed to reading PFF giving Harrison Smith an "81" while Adrian Amos receives an "80"?"
But you didn't state why the PFF grade would be more telling of an individual player's talents...you just listed the problems with using team stats and past performance. Perhaps you didn't understand my question, so I will ask again:
Wouldn't the overall effectiveness of a defense and past performance of a player be more telling of an individual player's talents as opposed to reading PFF giving Harrison Smith an "81" while Adrian Amos receives an "80"?
Oh cool. remy is still defending methodology of grading that he can't back up and of players he doesn't watch. Cool story.