Larsonite
Guacamole Taco
- Joined:
- Sep 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,411
- Liked Posts:
- 793
How christian of you:cubspalm:
Its "pendejo" numbnuts.
Sent from a spaghetti monster circling the earth
How christian of you:cubspalm:
Its "pendejo" numbnuts.
just one statement, if winning isn't the expected result, why be conservative?Not trying to give him an excuse. He blew it, looked like an idiot, and then was insulting in his post game comments.
But that is going to happen.
You cannot judge John Fox simply on his weaknesses.
Lovie Smith did the same shit. Lovie Smith probably did worse, in fact, much larger body of work to **** up. I'd also rather have John Fox over the likes of say, Dave Wannstedt and Dick Jauron. and his Monday-Saturday coaching regimen certainly has to be better than taking a group picture in the locker room of mixed positions singing kumbaya together or whatever the **** Trestman had going on to procure Brandon Marshall into a locker room cancer again. but to each his own.
in fact, every coach that loses, let's just call them conservative and stupid. we'll set aside the fact there has to be a loser, or make them a half loser if they tie.
you loved Jay Cutler once, and I'll continue to throw it in your face.
this is a relative moot point though, disregarding he turned the ball over something like 8 times so far, he's not the reason they're losing games, SO WE HAVE THAT GOING FOR US RIGHT GUYS???
the Seahawks got unbelievably lucky with their drafting. there's probably never going to be a team that ever pulls that off again, that's how insane it was. they're not all gonna stay with the team forever though, they can't pay everyone. I don't follow any other team outside the Bears
can we at least let the rest of the season play out before we call him a cotton-headed ninnymuggins?
Broc said:
You can say that again.
:cubspalm:
Its "pendejo" numbnuts.
well again, if there is no expectation from this coaching staff, why run a conservative offense?
What is there to lose to open it up?
A loss is a loss is a loss.
After you jumped into a conversation that wasn't directed towards you? You seem to be stalking me cause you were mad i disagreed with some of your game day posts. Funny how others called you names and insulted your football intelligence but i was polite in my disagreement. And then you show up in this thread, responding to another's post who was responding to me only to call me names and insults. I'm surprised you're a jesus fan because that's not what Jesus would do. And all this started on god's day. How christian of you.Well, THB, I just wanted an excuse to use the CUBSfailpalm today. You provided.
Are you fucking for real? What is there to lose?
Remember when there was basically unanimous agreement around here that the less you ask Cutler to do, the better he is? Which this year has pretty much demonstrated so far?
The team.yep, what is there to lose?
Many on here wanted the bears to go 0-16. So what difference does how any player plays make if the ultimate goal is to lose every game? Can't say for sure you were one of those.
yep, what is there to lose?
Many on here wanted the bears to go 0-16. So what difference does how any player plays make if the ultimate goal is to lose every game? Can't say for sure you were one of those.
well if there is to be a 50% turnover, then being conservative still doesn't make sense. See what kind of players you have. No need to run three straight up the middle for a two yard gain. Isn't logical.The team.
It was that you lose teams by trying to go 0-16. There is something to lose. If they stop trying, you don't even know who can play.