And this is what we want to invest in next year? He will end up somewhere around 17-21 when the year is over. This is smelling like Daniel Jones before his contract. It’s time to move on people. Fields would at best be top 15 next year. That’s just not good enough
Here’s how NFL quarterbacks, including Bears QB Justin Fields, stack up by QBR in Week 15.
bearswire.usatoday.com
Saw this back in 2018...QBR is a pathetic stat and only used by morons trying to use it as a be all. Already posted articles how pathetic it was......and found this from back then
If we look at the stat kines of the 2 starting QBs.
Tannehill
20/28, 230 yards, 2TDs, 2Ints.
1 sack
Traditional efficiency stats.
NFL passer rating: 89.9
Y/A: 8.2
Adjusted Y/A 6.4
Marcus Mariota
9/16, 103 yards, 0TDs, 2Ints
0 sacks
NFL passer rating: 36.2
Y/A: 6.4
Adjusted Y/A: 0.8
So by traditional methods Tannehill had the more efficient afternoon.
After watching the game both QBs had some swings and roundabouts, some missed interceptions and some some missed opportunities for more catches. It’s not like the rceivers were bailing Tannehill out by making freakish catches and Mariota’s receivers were bobbling perfectly thrown balls into interceptions. From my seat the non-QB element wasn’t going hugely in the favor of one player or another.
There were no fumbles by either QB
Rushing: Tannehill 4 for 4 yards, 0TDs - but 2 of those attempts were kneel down to end each half.
Mariota: 3 for 15 yards 0TDs
So nothing that moves the needle too much
But according to ESPN
Tannehill: 34.3
Mariota: 37.4
I totally get ESPN’s qbr giving Mariota a failing grade, traditional stats do too, but I can’t see how ESPN’s magic number box can give Tannehill a grade worse than Mariota and retain any credibility.