Leddy sent to Rockford?

[the canadian dream]

Come on bring him back up!!!



No one can tell me Culli or Scott have been any better than Leddy. If they try to I won't listen anyways lol. Give the kid a few more games. Would be nice to see him tomorrow instead of Culli or Scotts tired legs out there. Yes No?

 

[Guest]

[quote name="the canadian dream"]Come on bring him back up!!!



No one can tell me Culli or Scott have been any better than Leddy. If they try to I won't listen anyways lol. Give the kid a few more games. Would be nice to see him tomorrow instead of Culli or Scotts tired legs out there. Yes No?[/quote]



1. He's not ready.



2. They saved a year on his eligibility by sending him down. Birthday before December.



3. Why rush him? Let him get massive minutes in the A and learn the game some more.



4. Both Keith and Seabrook spent time in Norfolk. Keith 2 years. There is a reason development at D is important.



Leddy belongs in Rockford, and that's where he should stay.

 

[5Minutes4Fighting]

[quote name="R K"]



1. He's not ready.



2. They saved a year on his eligibility by sending him down. Birthday before December.



3. Why rush him? Let him get massive minutes in the A and learn the game some more.



4. Both Keith and Seabrook spent time in Norfolk. Keith 2 years. There is a reason development at D is important.



Leddy belongs in Rockford, and that's where he should stay.[/quote]



Perfectly stated.

 

[Ton]

[quote name="the canadian dream"]Come on bring him back up!!!



No one can tell me Culli or Scott have been any better than Leddy. If they try to I won't listen anyways lol. Give the kid a few more games. Would be nice to see him tomorrow instead of Culli or Scotts tired legs out there. Yes No?[/quote]



I'm with you.

 

[bubbleheadchief]

There is a rule out there limiting the number of games an under 20 (yrs of age) player can play in the big show, something like 10 I want to say......is this if he plays more then that they cant send him back to juniors? Or is it something to do with his entry level contract....**** I am fuzzy about this one....just something in the back of my mind about this IRT Leddy and wondering if that is going to affect any future call ups this year for him.

 

[Shredder]

If it's a battle for the 6th spot between Leddy and Scott, then sure, bring him back up. I would not take him over Boynton or Hendry at this point, though. Hendry really needs to be in the lineup instead of Scott. At the very least, he does everything Scott does with the added bonus that he's not slow as molasses.

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

[quote name="Shredder"]If it's a battle for the 6th spot between Leddy and Scott, then sure, bring him back up. I would not take him over Boynton or Hendry at this point, though. Hendry really needs to be in the lineup instead of Scott. At the very least, he does everything Scott does with the added bonus that he's not slow as molasses.[/quote]



Someone stated that Hendry might be injured... don't know why else he wouldn't be in there except for Scott.

 

[the canadian dream]

FINE!!



I hate you all.



I understand why he was sent down. And yes the 10 game rule is a dirty whore. I just am one who thinks you play your best players if you can. Scott on D and Culli out there are not our best available players. That's all. But yes I understand the concept of the future and all that cap crap (hating the cap again people!!! lol).



I'm a Leddy fan. He just sold me is all.

 

[BigPete]

[quote name="Stu Grimson"]



Someone stated that Hendry might be injured... don't know why else he wouldn't be in there except for Scott.[/quote]

Scooter, Scotty, and Q don't like Hendry. I don't know why, cause I think he is a perfectly servicable 6th Dman, but what the **** do I know. I'm not the genius that thinks Scott and Cullisuck are BETTER options that Hendry or Leddy (rookie rules be damned).

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

[quote name="BigPete"]

Scooter, Scotty, and Q don't like Hendry. I don't know why, cause I think he is a perfectly servicable 6th Dman, but what the **** do I know. I'm not the genius that thinks Scott and Cullisuck are BETTER options that Hendry or Leddy (rookie rules be damned).[/quote]



I can understand them wanting Leddy to play more minute down in Rockford, but Hendry has more than proven himself IMO to be better than Scott/Cullimore.

 

[E Runs]

Maybe Hendry had a threesome with Q's wife and daughter?

 

[Guest]

[quote name="E Runs"]Maybe Hendry had a threesome with Q's wife and daughter?[/quote]





Got me but in the last two games it's Keiths and Hjarlmarssons turn overs that have caused the games. So I'm not sure what everyone is so pissed about boynton Cullimore and Scott.

 

[BigPete]

[quote name="R K"]





Got me but in the last two games it's Keiths and Hjarlmarssons turn overs that have caused the games. So I'm not sure what everyone is so pissed about boynton Cullimore and Scott.[/quote]

huh? Boynton handed the puck to a BJ in the slot with Corey still playing the far post. Was that at the other end of the ice from you...don't answer, I already know!



PS I am not saying DK and NH are guiltfree though.

 

[Guest]

[quote name="BigPete"]

huh? Boynton handed the puck to a BJ in the slot with Corey still playing the far post. Was that at the other end of the ice from you...don't answer, I already know!



PS I am not saying DK and NH are guiltfree though.[/quote]



That was the 2nd goal.



1st goal was Duncan not controlling the puck carrier, 3rd and winning goal was Hjarlmarsson giving the puck away at the blue line for the shot that rebounded 2-3 times.



The 2nd goal was part of the 5 minute PK. I'm fully aware of how all three were scored. I do pay attention from time to time.

 

[E Runs]

[quote name="R K"]





Got me but in the last two games it's Keiths and Hjarlmarssons turn overs that have caused the games. So I'm not sure what everyone is so pissed about boynton Cullimore and Scott.[/quote]

because they are the easy scapegoats when in reality the only part of the Hawks game they're hurting is the transition. They have been decent to fine in their own zone.

 

[Guest]

[quote name="E Runs"]

because they are the easy scapegoats when in reality the only part of the Hawks game they're hurting is the transition. They have been decent to fine in their own zone.[/quote]



Hopefully Campbell will settle that down some. Help Hjarlmarsson and relieve some pressure off of Seabs and Keith. I've never seen Keith play like this since he's been here. Not even in his rookie year.



It's odd because he is for the most part, other than a GA here and there, extremely solid as a two way player. Seabrook was fine tonight so I'm not sure why Duncan is having so many issues.

 

[maryo]

Well Dunc didn't exactly have a Sophomore slump, so maybe he's having a Norris slump instead?

 

[Guest]

[quote name="maryo"]Well Dunc didn't exactly have a Sophomore slump, so maybe he's having a Norris slump instead?[/quote]



Could be. Could also be averaging over 30 mintues a night, but that doesn't explain the poor decisions he's been making early in games.



Let's just hope Campbell figures it out and or the addition of him in the line up settles the top pair and Hjarlmarsson down.



Campbell has began to skate. It should only be a week or so..

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

[quote name="R K"]



Could be. Could also be averaging over 30 mintues a night, but that doesn't explain the poor decisions he's been making early in games.



Let's just hope Campbell figures it out and or the addition of him in the line up settles the top pair and Hjarlmarsson down.



Campbell has began to skate. It should only be a week or so..[/quote]



Is he ahead of schedule? I can't remember where I heard but I thought I heard 2+ weeks out. Good to hear if he's ahead of schedule though.

 

[Guest]

[quote name="Stu Grimson"]



Is he ahead of schedule? I can't remember where I heard but I thought I heard 2+ weeks out. Good to hear if he's ahead of schedule though.[/quote]



Q said he looked good and he's been walking with no limp for awhile now. He appears to be a fast healer but they said 4-5 weeks and that's just about on schedule. I really think they thought he might be back earlier. Or hoped.